skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Unifying Phylogenetic Birth–Death Models in Epidemiology and Macroevolution
Abstract Birth–death stochastic processes are the foundations of many phylogenetic models and are widely used to make inferences about epidemiological and macroevolutionary dynamics. There are a large number of birth–death model variants that have been developed; these impose different assumptions about the temporal dynamics of the parameters and about the sampling process. As each of these variants was individually derived, it has been difficult to understand the relationships between them as well as their precise biological and mathematical assumptions. Without a common mathematical foundation, deriving new models is nontrivial. Here, we unify these models into a single framework, prove that many previously developed epidemiological and macroevolutionary models are all special cases of a more general model, and illustrate the connections between these variants. This unification includes both models where the process is the same for all lineages and those in which it varies across types. We also outline a straightforward procedure for deriving likelihood functions for arbitrarily complex birth–death(-sampling) models that will hopefully allow researchers to explore a wider array of scenarios than was previously possible. By rederiving existing single-type birth–death sampling models, we clarify and synthesize the range of explicit and implicit assumptions made by these models. [Birth–death processes; epidemiology; macroevolution; phylogenetics; statistical inference.]  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2028986
PAR ID:
10296290
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Editor(s):
Albert, James
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Systematic Biology
ISSN:
1063-5157
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Molecular Biology and Evolution)
    Crandall, Keith (Ed.)
    Abstract Viral phylogenies provide crucial information on the spread of infectious diseases, and many studies fit mathematical models to phylogenetic data to estimate epidemiological parameters such as the effective reproduction ratio (Re) over time. Such phylodynamic inferences often complement or even substitute for conventional surveillance data, particularly when sampling is poor or delayed. It remains generally unknown, however, how robust phylodynamic epidemiological inferences are, especially when there is uncertainty regarding pathogen prevalence and sampling intensity. Here, we use recently developed mathematical techniques to fully characterize the information that can possibly be extracted from serially collected viral phylogenetic data, in the context of the commonly used birth-death-sampling model. We show that for any candidate epidemiological scenario, there exists a myriad of alternative, markedly different, and yet plausible “congruent” scenarios that cannot be distinguished using phylogenetic data alone, no matter how large the data set. In the absence of strong constraints or rate priors across the entire study period, neither maximum-likelihood fitting nor Bayesian inference can reliably reconstruct the true epidemiological dynamics from phylogenetic data alone; rather, estimators can only converge to the “congruence class” of the true dynamics. We propose concrete and feasible strategies for making more robust epidemiological inferences from viral phylogenetic data. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; (, Methods in Ecology and Evolution)
    Abstract Gene flow is increasingly recognized as an important macroevolutionary process. The many mechanisms that contribute to gene flow (e.g. introgression, hybridization, lateral gene transfer) uniquely affect the diversification of dynamics of species, making it important to be able to account for these idiosyncrasies when constructing phylogenetic models. Existing phylogenetic‐network simulators for macroevolution are limited in the ways they model gene flow.We presentSiPhyNetwork, an R package for simulating phylogenetic networks under a birth–death‐hybridization process.Our package unifies the existing birth–death‐hybridization models while also extending the toolkit for modelling gene flow. This tool can create patterns of reticulation such as hybridization, lateral gene transfer, and introgression.Specifically, we model different reticulate events by allowing events to either add, remove or keep constant the number of lineages. Additionally, we allow reticulation events to be trait dependent, creating the ability to model the expanse of isolating mechanisms that prevent gene flow. This tool makes it possible for researchers to model many of the complex biological factors associated with gene flow in a phylogenetic context. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, mSphere)
    Buchler, Nicolas E (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Infectious diseases remain a major cause of global mortality, yet basic questions concerning the relationship between within-host processes governing pathogen burden (pathogen replication, immune responses) and population-scale (epidemiological) patterns of mortality remain obscure. We use a structured literature review to leverage the extensive biomedical data generated by controlled host infections to address the epidemiological question of whether infection-induced mortality is constant, accelerating, or follows some other pattern of change and to infer the within-host mechanistic basis of this pattern. We show that across diverse lethal infection models, the risk of death increases approximately exponentially in time since infection, in a manner phenomenologically similar to the dynamics of all-cause death. We further show that this pattern of accelerating risk is consistent with multiple alternate mechanisms of pathogen growth and host-pathogen interaction, underlining the limitations of current experimental approaches to connect within-host processes to epidemiological patterns. We review critical experimental questions that our work highlights, requiring additional non-invasive data on pathogen burden throughout the course of infection.IMPORTANCEHere, we ask a simple question: what are the dynamics of pathogen-induced death? Death is a central phenotype in both biomedical and epidemiological infectious disease biology, yet very little work has attempted to link the biomedical focus on pathogen dynamics within a host and the epidemiological focus on populations of infected hosts. To systematically characterize the dynamics of death in controlled animal infections, we analyzed 209 data sets spanning diverse lethal animal infection models. Across experimental models, we find robust support for an accelerating risk of death since the time of infection, contrasting with conventional epidemiological models that assume a constant elevated risk of death. Using math models, we show that multiple processes of growth and virulence are consistent with accelerating risk of death, and we end with a discussion of critical experiments to resolve how within-host biomedical processes map onto epidemiological patterns of disease. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, Ecology and Evolution)
    Abstract Biologists have long sought to quantify the number of species on Earth. Often missing from these efforts is the contribution of microorganisms, the smallest but most abundant form of life on the planet. Despite recent large‐scale sampling efforts, estimates of global microbial diversity span many orders of magnitude. It is important to consider how speciation and extinction over the last 4 billion years constrain inventories of biodiversity. We parameterized macroevolutionary models based on birth–death processes that assume constant and universal speciation and extinction rates. The models reveal that richness beyond 1012species is feasible and in agreement with empirical predictions. Additional simulations suggest that mass extinction events do not place hard limits on modern‐day microbial diversity. Together, our study provides independent support for a massive global‐scale microbiome while shedding light on the upper limits of life on Earth. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences)
    The effect of traits on diversification rates is a major topic of study in the fields of evolutionary biology and palaeontology. Many researchers investigating these macroevolutionary questions currently make use of the extensive suite of state-dependent speciation and extinction (SSE) models. These models were developed for, and are almost exclusively used with, phylogenetic trees of extant species. However, analyses considering only extant taxa are limited in their power to estimate extinction rates. Furthermore, SSE models can erroneously detect associations between neutral traits and diversification rates when the true associated trait is not observed. In this study, we examined the impact of including fossil data on the accuracy of parameter estimates under the binary-state speciation and extinction (BiSSE) model. This was achieved by combining SSE models with the fossilized birth–death process. We show that the inclusion of fossils improves the accuracy of extinction-rate estimates for analyses applying the BiSSE model in a Bayesian inference framework, with no negative impact on speciation-rate and state transition-rate estimates when compared with estimates from trees of only extant taxa. However, even with the addition of fossil data, analyses under the BiSSE model continued to incorrectly identify correlations between diversification rates and neutral traits. This article is part of the theme issue ‘“A mathematical theory of evolution”: phylogenetic models dating back 100 years’. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email