skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: 2019/20 lessons from τ(Ωc0) and τ(Ξc0) and CP asymmetry in charm decays
Our 2003 “Cicerone” had discussed charm dynamics with different directions and levels. 1 Here we focus on two items, where the “landscape” has changed sizably. (a) The lifetimes and semileptonic decays of charm hadrons show the impact of nonperturbative QCD and to which degree one can apply heavy quark expansion (HQE) for charm hadrons. It is more complex as we have learnt from 2019/20 data. (b) CP asymmetry has been established in 2019: 2 [Formula: see text] is quite an achievement by the LHCb collaboration! Our community is at the beginning of a long travel for fundamental dynamics. Can the SM account for these? We discuss the assumptions that were made up to 2018 data and new conclusions from 2019/20 ones. We need more data; however, one has to discuss correlations between different transitions. We give an Appendix, what we have learnt for large CP asymmetry in [Formula: see text].  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1820860
PAR ID:
10297318
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
International Journal of Modern Physics A
Volume:
35
Issue:
24
ISSN:
0217-751X
Page Range / eLocation ID:
2030013
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract A search is reported for charge-parity$$CP$$ CP violation in$${{{\textrm{D}}}^{{0}}} \rightarrow {{\textrm{K}} _{\text {S}}^{{0}}} {{\textrm{K}} _{\text {S}}^{{0}}} $$ D 0 K S 0 K S 0 decays, using data collected in proton–proton collisions at$$\sqrt{s} = 13\,\text {Te}\hspace{-.08em}\text {V} $$ s = 13 Te V recorded by the CMS experiment in 2018. The analysis uses a dedicated data set that corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 41.6$$\,\text {fb}^{-1}$$ fb - 1 , which consists of about 10 billion events containing a pair of b hadrons, nearly all of which decay to charm hadrons. The flavor of the neutral D meson is determined by the pion charge in the reconstructed decays$${{{\textrm{D}}}^{{*+}}} \rightarrow {{{\textrm{D}}}^{{0}}} {{{\mathrm{\uppi }}}^{{+}}} $$ D + D 0 π + and$${{{\textrm{D}}}^{{*-}}} \rightarrow {\overline{{\textrm{D}}}^{{0}}} {{{\mathrm{\uppi }}}^{{-}}} $$ D - D ¯ 0 π - . The$$CP$$ CP asymmetry in$${{{\textrm{D}}}^{{0}}} \rightarrow {{\textrm{K}} _{\text {S}}^{{0}}} {{\textrm{K}} _{\text {S}}^{{0}}} $$ D 0 K S 0 K S 0 is measured to be$$A_{CP} ({{\textrm{K}} _{\text {S}}^{{0}}} {{\textrm{K}} _{\text {S}}^{{0}}} ) = (6.2 \pm 3.0 \pm 0.2 \pm 0.8)\%$$ A CP ( K S 0 K S 0 ) = ( 6.2 ± 3.0 ± 0.2 ± 0.8 ) % , where the three uncertainties represent the statistical uncertainty, the systematic uncertainty, and the uncertainty in the measurement of the$$CP$$ CP asymmetry in the$${{{\textrm{D}}}^{{0}}} \rightarrow {{\textrm{K}} _{\text {S}}^{{0}}} {{{\mathrm{\uppi }}}^{{+}}} {{{\mathrm{\uppi }}}^{{-}}} $$ D 0 K S 0 π + π - decay. This is the first$$CP$$ CP asymmetry measurement by CMS in the charm sector as well as the first to utilize a fully hadronic final state. 
    more » « less
  2. New LHCb Collaboration results on pentaquarks with hidden charm 1 are discussed. These results fit nicely in the hadrocharmonium pentaquark scenario.[Formula: see text] In the new data the old LHCb pentaquark [Formula: see text] splits into two states [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. We interpret these two almost degenerated hadrocharmonium states with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], as a result of hyperfine splitting between hadrocharmonium states predicted in Ref. 2. It arises due to QCD multipole interaction between color-singlet hadrocharmonium constituents. We improve the theoretical estimate of hyperfine splitting[Formula: see text] that is compatible with the experimental data. The new [Formula: see text] state finds a natural explanation as a bound state of [Formula: see text] and a nucleon, with [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and binding energy 42 MeV. As a bound state of a spin-[Formula: see text] meson and a nucleon, hadrocharmonium pentaquark [Formula: see text] does not experience hyperfine splitting. We find a series of hadrocharmonium states in the vicinity of the wide [Formula: see text] pentaquark that can explain its apparently large decay width. We compare the hadrocharmonium and molecular pentaquark scenarios and discuss their relative advantages and drawbacks. 
    more » « less
  3. We study the dynamics of the unicritical polynomial family [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text]-values for which [Formula: see text] has a strictly preperiodic postcritical orbit are called Misiurewicz parameters, and they are the roots of Misiurewicz polynomials. The arithmetic properties of these special parameters have found applications in both arithmetic and complex dynamics. In this paper, we investigate some new such properties. In particular, when [Formula: see text] is a prime power and [Formula: see text] is a Misiurewicz parameter, we prove certain arithmetic relations between the points in the postcritical orbit of [Formula: see text]. We also consider the algebraic integers obtained by evaluating a Misiurewicz polynomial at a different Misiurewicz parameter, and we ask when these algebraic integers are algebraic units. This question naturally arises from some results recently proven by Buff, Epstein, and Koch and by the second author. We propose a conjectural answer to this question, which we prove in many cases. 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    We prove the Marchenko–Pastur law for the eigenvalues of [Formula: see text] sample covariance matrices in two new situations where the data does not have independent coordinates. In the first scenario — the block-independent model — the [Formula: see text] coordinates of the data are partitioned into blocks in such a way that the entries in different blocks are independent, but the entries from the same block may be dependent. In the second scenario — the random tensor model — the data is the homogeneous random tensor of order [Formula: see text], i.e. the coordinates of the data are all [Formula: see text] different products of [Formula: see text] variables chosen from a set of [Formula: see text] independent random variables. We show that Marchenko–Pastur law holds for the block-independent model as long as the size of the largest block is [Formula: see text], and for the random tensor model as long as [Formula: see text]. Our main technical tools are new concentration inequalities for quadratic forms in random variables with block-independent coordinates, and for random tensors. 
    more » « less
  5. The Golden–Thompson trace inequality, which states that Tr  e H+ K ≤ Tr  e H e K , has proved to be very useful in quantum statistical mechanics. Golden used it to show that the classical free energy is less than the quantum one. Here, we make this G–T inequality more explicit by proving that for some operators, notably the operators of interest in quantum mechanics, H = Δ or [Formula: see text] and K = potential, Tr  e H+(1− u) K e uK is a monotone increasing function of the parameter u for 0 ≤ u ≤ 1. Our proof utilizes an inequality of Ando, Hiai, and Okubo (AHO): Tr  X s Y t X 1− s Y 1− t ≤ Tr  XY for positive operators X, Y and for [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]. The obvious conjecture that this inequality should hold up to s + t ≤ 1 was proved false by Plevnik [Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 47, 491–500 (2016)]. We give a different proof of AHO and also give more counterexamples in the [Formula: see text] range. More importantly, we show that the inequality conjectured in AHO does indeed hold in the full range if X, Y have a certain positivity property—one that does hold for quantum mechanical operators, thus enabling us to prove our G–T monotonicity theorem. 
    more » « less