Recent advances in satellite observations of solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) provide a new opportunity to constrain the simulation of terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP). Accurate representation of the processes driving SIF emission and its radiative transfer to remote sensing sensors is an essential prerequisite for data assimilation. Recently, SIF simulations have been incorporated into several land surface models, but the scaling of SIF from leaf‐level to canopy‐level is usually not well‐represented. Here, we incorporate the simulation of far‐red SIF observed at nadir into the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5). Leaf‐level fluorescence yield was simulated by a parametric simplification of the Soil Canopy‐Observation of Photosynthesis and Energy fluxes model (SCOPE). And an efficient and accurate method based on escape probability is developed to scale SIF from leaf‐level to top‐of‐canopy while taking clumping and the radiative transfer processes into account. SIF simulated by CLM5 and SCOPE agreed well at sites except one in needleleaf forest (
- Award ID(s):
- 1637686
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10301462
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 1991-9603
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 6741 to 6763
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract R 2 > 0.91, root‐mean‐square error <0.19 W⋅m−2⋅sr−1⋅μm−1), and captured the day‐to‐day variation of tower‐measured SIF at temperate forest sites (R 2 > 0.68). At the global scale, simulated SIF generally captured the spatial and seasonal patterns of satellite‐observed SIF. Factors including the fluorescence emission model, clumping, bidirectional effect, and leaf optical properties had considerable impacts on SIF simulation, and the discrepancies between simulate d and observed SIF varied with plant functional type. By improving the representation of radiative transfer for SIF simulation, our model allows better comparisons between simulated and observed SIF toward constraining GPP simulations. -
Abstract Accurate estimation of terrestrial gross primary productivity (
GPP ) remains a challenge despite its importance in the global carbon cycle. Chlorophyll fluorescence (ChlF) has been recently adopted to understand photosynthesis and its response to the environment, particularly with remote sensing data. However, it remains unclear how ChlF and photosynthesis are linked at different spatial scales across the growing season. We examined seasonal relationships between ChlF and photosynthesis at the leaf, canopy, and ecosystem scales and explored how leaf‐level ChlF was linked with canopy‐scale solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF ) in a temperate deciduous forest at Harvard Forest, Massachusetts,USA . Our results show that ChlF captured the seasonal variations of photosynthesis with significant linear relationships between ChlF and photosynthesis across the growing season over different spatial scales (R 2 = 0.73, 0.77, and 0.86 at leaf, canopy, and satellite scales, respectively;P < 0.0001). We developed a model to estimateGPP from the tower‐based measurement ofSIF and leaf‐level ChlF parameters. The estimation ofGPP from this model agreed well with flux tower observations ofGPP (R 2 = 0.68;P < 0.0001), demonstrating the potential ofSIF for modelingGPP . At the leaf scale, we found that leafF q ’ /F m ’ , the fraction of absorbed photons that are used for photochemistry for a light‐adapted measurement from a pulse amplitude modulation fluorometer, was the best leaf fluorescence parameter to correlate with canopySIF yield (SIF /APAR ,R 2 = 0.79;P < 0.0001). We also found that canopySIF andSIF ‐derivedGPP (GPPSIF ) were strongly correlated to leaf‐level biochemistry and canopy structure, including chlorophyll content (R 2 = 0.65 for canopyGPPSIF and chlorophyll content;P < 0.0001), leaf area index (LAI ) (R 2 = 0.35 for canopyGPPSIF andLAI ;P < 0.0001), and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI ) (R 2 = 0.36 for canopyGPPSIF andNDVI ;P < 0.0001). Our results suggest that ChlF can be a powerful tool to track photosynthetic rates at leaf, canopy, and ecosystem scales. -
Abstract Earth system models (
ESM s) rely on the calculation of canopy conductance in land surface models (LSM s) to quantify the partitioning of land surface energy, water, andCO 2fluxes. This is achieved by scaling stomatal conductance,g w, determined from physiological models developed for leaves. Traditionally, models forg whave been semi‐empirical, combining physiological functions with empirically determined calibration constants. More recently, optimization theory has been applied to modelg winLSM s under the premise that it has a stronger grounding in physiological theory and might ultimately lead to improved predictive accuracy. However, this premise has not been thoroughly tested. Using original field data from contrasting forest systems, we compare a widely used empirical type and a more recently developed optimization‐typeg wmodel, termedBB andMED , respectively. Overall, we find no difference between the two models when used to simulateg wfrom photosynthesis data, or leaf gas exchange from a coupled photosynthesis‐conductance model, or gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration for aFLUXNET tower site with theCLM 5 communityLSM . Field measurements reveal that the key fitted parameters forBB andMED ,g 1Bandg 1M,exhibit strong species specificity in magnitude and sensitivity toCO 2, andCLM 5 simulations reveal that failure to include this sensitivity can result in significant overestimates of evapotranspiration for high‐CO 2scenarios. Further, we show thatg 1Bandg 1Mcan be determined from meanc i/c a(ratio of leaf intercellular to ambientCO 2concentration). Applying this relationship withc i/c avalues derived from a leaf δ13C database, we obtain a global distribution ofg 1Bandg 1M, and these values correlate significantly with mean annual precipitation. This provides a new methodology for global parameterization of theBB andMED models inLSM s, tied directly to leaf physiology but unconstrained by spatial boundaries separating designated biomes or plant functional types. -
null (Ed.)Abstract. Evaporation (E) and transpiration (T) respond differentlyto ongoing changes in climate, atmospheric composition, and land use. It isdifficult to partition ecosystem-scale evapotranspiration (ET) measurementsinto E and T, which makes it difficult to validate satellite data and landsurface models. Here, we review current progress in partitioning E and T andprovide a prospectus for how to improve theory and observations goingforward. Recent advancements in analytical techniques create newopportunities for partitioning E and T at the ecosystem scale, but theirassumptions have yet to be fully tested. For example, many approaches topartition E and T rely on the notion that plant canopy conductance andecosystem water use efficiency exhibit optimal responses to atmosphericvapor pressure deficit (D). We use observations from 240 eddy covariance fluxtowers to demonstrate that optimal ecosystem response to D is a reasonableassumption, in agreement with recent studies, but more analysis is necessaryto determine the conditions for which this assumption holds. Anothercritical assumption for many partitioning approaches is that ET can beapproximated as T during ideal transpiring conditions, which has beenchallenged by observational studies. We demonstrate that T can exceed 95 %of ET from certain ecosystems, but other ecosystems do not appear to reachthis value, which suggests that this assumption is ecosystem-dependent withimplications for partitioning. It is important to further improve approachesfor partitioning E and T, yet few multi-method comparisons have beenundertaken to date. Advances in our understanding of carbon–water couplingat the stomatal, leaf, and canopy level open new perspectives on how toquantify T via its strong coupling with photosynthesis. Photosynthesis can beconstrained at the ecosystem and global scales with emerging data sourcesincluding solar-induced fluorescence, carbonyl sulfide flux measurements,thermography, and more. Such comparisons would improve our mechanisticunderstanding of ecosystem water fluxes and provide the observationsnecessary to validate remote sensing algorithms and land surface models tounderstand the changing global water cycle.more » « less
-
Abstract Tropical forest canopies cycle vast amounts of carbon, yet we still have a limited understanding of how these critical ecosystems will respond to climate warming. We implemented in situ leaf‐level + 3°C experimental warming from the understory to the upper canopy of two Puerto Rican tropical tree species,
Guarea guidonia andOcotea sintenisii . After approximately 1 month of continuous warming, we assessed adjustments in photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal conductance, leaf traits and foliar respiration. Warming did not alter net photosynthetic temperature response for either species; however, the optimum temperature ofOcotea understory leaf photosynthetic electron transport shifted upward. There was noOcotea respiratory treatment effect, whileGuarea respiratory temperature sensitivity (Q 10) was down‐regulated in heated leaves. The optimum temperatures for photosynthesis (T opt) decreased 3–5°C from understory to the highest canopy position, perhaps due to upper canopy stomatal conductance limitations.Guarea upper canopyT optwas similar to the mean daytime temperatures, whileOcotea canopy leaves often operated aboveT opt. With minimal acclimation to warmer temperatures in the upper canopy, further warming could put these forests at risk of reduced CO2uptake, which could weaken the overall carbon sink strength of this tropical forest.