skip to main content

Title: Containing Malicious Package Updates in npm with a Lightweight Permission System
The large amount of third-party packages available in fast-moving software ecosystems, such as Node.js/npm, enables attackers to compromise applications by pushing malicious updates to their package dependencies. Studying the npm repository, we observed that many packages in the npm repository that are used in Node.js applications perform only simple computations and do not need access to filesystem or network APIs. This offers the opportunity to enforce least-privilege design per package, protecting applications and package dependencies from malicious updates. We propose a lightweight permission system that protects Node.js applications by enforcing package permissions at runtime. We discuss the design space of solutions and show that our system makes a large number of packages much harder to be exploited, almost for free.
Authors:
; ; ;
Award ID(s):
1717022
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10302333
Journal Name:
2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
1334 to 1346
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. With an increased level of automation provided by package managers, which sometimes allow updates to be installed automatically, malicious package updates are becoming a real threat in software ecosystems. To address this issue, we propose an approach based on anomaly detection, to identify suspicious updates based on security-relevant features that attackers could use in an attack. We evaluate our approach in the context of Node.js/npm ecosystem, to show its feasibility in terms of reduced review effort and the correct identification of a confirmed malicious update attack. Although we do not expect it to be a complete solution in isolation, wemore »believe it is an important security building block for software ecosystems.« less
  2. Open source software projects often rely on package management systems that help projects discover, incorporate, and maintain dependencies on other packages, maintained by other people. Such systems save a great deal of effort over ad hoc ways of advertising, packaging, and transmitting useful libraries, but coordination among project teams is still needed when one package makes a breaking change affecting other packages. Ecosystems differ in their approaches to breaking changes, and there is no general theory to explain the relationships between features, behavioral norms, ecosystem outcomes, and motivating values. We address this through two empirical studies. In an interview casemore »study, we contrast Eclipse, NPM, and CRAN, demonstrating that these different norms for coordination of breaking changes shift the costs of using and maintaining the software among stakeholders, appropriate to each ecosystem’s mission. In a second study, we combine a survey, repository mining, and document analysis to broaden and systematize these observations across 18 ecosystems. We find that all ecosystems share values such as stability and compatibility, but differ in other values. Ecosystems’ practices often support their espoused values, but in surprisingly diverse ways. The data provides counterevidence against easy generalizations about why ecosystem communities do what they do.« less
  3. Background: As software development becomes more interdependent, unique relationships among software packages arise and form complex software ecosystems. Aim: We aim to understand the behavior of these ecosystems better through the lens of software supply chains and model how the effects of software dependency network affect the change in downloads of Javascript packages. Method: We analyzed 12,999 popular packages in NPM, between 01-December-2017 and 15-March-2018, using Linear Regression and Random Forest models and examined the effects of predictors representing different aspects of the software dependency supply chain on changes in numbers of downloads for a package. Result: Preliminary results suggestmore »that the count and downloads of upstream and downstream runtime dependencies have a strong effect on the change in downloads, with packages having fewer, more popular packages as dependencies (upstream or downstream) likely to see an increase in downloads. This suggests that in order to interpret the number of downloads for a package properly, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of the supply chain (both upstream and downstream) of that package. Conclusion: Future work is needed to identify the effects of added, deleted, and unchanged dependencies for different types of packages, e.g. build tools, test tools.« less
  4. Change introduces conflict into software ecosystems: breaking changes may ripple through the ecosystem and trigger rework for users of a package, but often developers can invest additional effort or accept opportunity costs to alleviate or delay downstream costs. We performed a multiple case study of three software ecosystems with different tooling and philosophies toward change, Eclipse, R/CRAN, and Node.js/npm, to understand how developers make decisions about change and change-related costs and what practices, tooling, and policies are used. We found that all three ecosystems differ substantially in their practices and expectations toward change and that those differences can be explainedmore »largely by different community values in each ecosystem. Our results illustrate that there is a large design space in how to build an ecosystem, its policies and its supporting infrastructure; and there is value in making community values and accepted tradeoffs explicit and transparent in order to resolve conflicts and negotiate change-related costs.« less
  5. Datasets are often derived by manipulating raw data with statistical software packages. The derivation of a dataset must be recorded in terms of both the raw input and the manipulations applied to it. Statistics packages typically provide limited help in documenting provenance for the resulting derived data. At best, the operations performed by the statistical package are described in a script. Disparate representations make these scripts hard to understand for users. To address these challenges, we created Continuous Capture of Metadata (C2Metadata), a system to capture data transformations in scripts for statistical packages and represent it as metadata in amore »standard format that is easy to understand. We do so by devising a Structured Data Transformation Algebra (SDTA), which uses a small set of algebraic operators to express a large fraction of data manipulation performed in practice. We then implement SDTA, inspired by relational algebra, in a data transformation specification language we call SDTL. In this demonstration, we showcase C2Metadata’s capture of data transformations from a pool of sample transformation scripts in at least two languages: SPSS®and Stata®(SAS®and R are under development), for social science data in a large academic repository. We will allow the audience to explore C2Metadata using a web-based interface, visualize the intermediate steps and trace the provenance and changes of data at different levels for better understanding of the process.« less