More Like this

1. In situ observation of the atomic shuffles during the {$${{11}}\bar{{{2}}}{{1}}$$} twinning in hexagonal close-packed rhenium

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47343-z  

   He, Yang; Fang, Zhengwu; Wang, Chongmin; Wang, Guofeng; Mao, Scott X. (April 2024, Nature Communications)

   Abstract Twinning, on par with dislocations, is critically required in plastic deformation of hexagonal close-packed crystals at low temperatures. In contrast to that in cubic-structured crystals, twinning in hexagonal close-packed crystals requires atomic shuffles in addition to shear. Though the twinning shear that is carried by twinning dislocations has been captured for decades, direct experimental observation of the atomic shuffles, especially when the shuffling mode is not unique and does not confine to the plane of shear, remains a formidable challenge to date. Here, by using in-situ transmission electron microscopy, we directly capture the atomic mechanism of the$$\left\{11\bar{2}1\right\}$$ $\left(11\overline{2}1\right)$twinning in hexagonal close packed rhenium nanocrystals. Results show that the$$\left\{11\bar{2}1\right\}$$ $\left(11\overline{2}1\right)$twinning is dominated by the (b_1/2, h_1/2) twinning disconnections. In contrast to conventional expectations, the atomic shuffles accompanying the twinning disconnections proceed on alternative basal planes along 1/6$$\left\langle 1\bar{1}00\right\rangle$$ $\left(1\overline{1}00\right)$, which may be attributed to the free surface in nanocrystal samples, leading to a lack of mirror symmetry across the$$\left\{11\bar{2}1\right\}$$ $\left(11\overline{2}1\right)$twin boundary. 

   more » « less
2. A case study of SMEFT $$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ effects in diboson processes: pp → W±(ℓ±ν)γ

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2024)223  

   Martin, Adam (May 2024, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> In this paper we explorepp→W^±(ℓ^±ν)γto$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ $O\left(1/{\Lambda }^4\right)$in the SMEFT expansion. Calculations to this order are necessary to properly capture SMEFT contributions that grow with energy, as the interference between energy-enhanced SMEFT effects at$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^2\right) $$ $O\left(1/{\Lambda }^2\right)$and the Standard Model is suppressed. We find that there are several dimension eight operators that interfere with the Standard Model and lead to the same energy growth, ~$$ \mathcal{O}\left({E}^4/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ $O\left(E^4/{\Lambda }^4\right)$, as dimension six squared. While energy-enhanced SMEFT contributions are a main focus, our calculation includes the complete set of$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ $O\left(1/{\Lambda }^4\right)$SMEFT effects consistent with U(3)⁵flavor symmetry. Additionally, we include the decay of theW^±→ ℓ^±ν, making the calculation actually$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {\ell}^{\pm}\nu \gamma $$ $\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to {\ell }^{\pm }\mathrm{\nu \gamma }$. As such, we are able to study the impact of non-resonant SMEFT operators, such as$$ \left({L}^{\dagger }{\overline{\sigma}}^{\mu }{\tau}^IL\right)\left({Q}^{\dagger }{\overline{\sigma}}^{\nu }{\tau}^IQ\right) $$ $\left(L^{†}{\overline{\sigma }}^{\mu }{\tau }^{I}L\right)\left(Q^{†}{\overline{\sigma }}^{\nu }{\tau }^{I}Q\right)$B_μν, which contribute to$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {\ell}^{\pm}\nu \gamma $$ $\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to {\ell }^{\pm }\mathrm{\nu \gamma }$directly and not to$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {W}^{\pm}\gamma $$ $\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to W^{\pm }\gamma$. We show several distributions to illustrate the shape differences of the different contributions. 

   more » « less
3. More accurate $$ \sigma \left(\mathcal{GG}\to h\right),\Gamma \left(h\to \mathcal{GG},\mathcal{AA},\overline{\Psi}\Psi \right) $$ and Higgs width results via the geoSMEFT

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2024)170  

   Martin, Adam; Trott, Michael (January 2024, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> We develop Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) predictions ofσ($$ \mathcal{GG} $$ $\mathrm{GG}$→h), Γ(h→$$ \mathcal{GG} $$ $\mathrm{GG}$), Γ(h→$$ \mathcal{AA} $$ $\mathrm{AA}$) to incorporate full two loop Standard Model results at the amplitude level, in conjunction with dimension eight SMEFT corrections. We simultaneously report consistent Γ(h→$$ \overline{\Psi}\Psi $$ $\overline{\Psi }\Psi$) results including leading QCD corrections and dimension eight SMEFT corrections. This extends the predictions of the former processes Γ, σto a full set of corrections at$$ \mathcal{O}\left({\overline{v}}_T^2/{\varLambda}^2{\left(16{\pi}^2\right)}^2\right) $$ $O\left({\overline{v}}_T^2/{\Lambda }^2{\left(16{\pi }^2\right)}^2\right)$and$$ \mathcal{O}\left({\overline{v}}_T^4/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ $O\left({\overline{v}}_T^4/{\Lambda }^4\right)$, where$$ {\overline{v}}_T $$ ${\overline{v}}_T$is the electroweak scale vacuum expectation value and Λ is the cut off scale of the SMEFT. Throughout, cross consistency between the operator and loop expansions is maintained by the use of the geometric SMEFT formalism. For Γ(h→$$ \overline{\Psi}\Psi $$ $\overline{\Psi }\Psi$), we include results at$$ \mathcal{O}\left({\overline{v}}_T^2/{\Lambda}^2\left(16{\pi}^2\right)\right) $$ $O\left({\overline{v}}_T^2/{\Lambda }^2\left(16{\pi }^2\right)\right)$in the limit where subleadingm_Ψ→ 0 corrections are neglected. We clarify how gauge invariant SMEFT renormalization counterterms combine with the Standard Model counter terms in higher order SMEFT calculations when the Background Field Method is used. We also update the prediction of the total Higgs width in the SMEFT to consistently include some of these higher order perturbative effects. 

   more » « less
4. Measurement of the branching fractions of $$ \overline{B} $$ → D(*)K−$$ {K}_{(S)}^{\left(\ast \right)0} $$ and $$ \overline{B} $$ → D(*)$$ {D}_s^{-} $$ decays at Belle II

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2024)206  

   Adachi, I; Aggarwal, L; Aihara, H; Akopov, N; Aloisio, A; Althubiti, N; Anh_Ky, N; Asner, D M; Atmacan, H; Aushev, T; et al (August 2024, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   Abstract We present measurements of the branching fractions of eight$$ {\overline{B}}^0 $$ ${\overline{B}}^0$→D^(*)+K⁻$$ {K}_{(S)}^{\left(\ast \right)0} $$ $K_{\left(S\right)}^{\left(\ast \right)0}$,B⁻→D^(*)0K⁻$$ {K}_{(S)}^{\left(\ast \right)0} $$ $K_{\left(S\right)}^{\left(\ast \right)0}$decay channels. The results are based on data from SuperKEKB electron-positron collisions at the Υ(4S) resonance collected with the Belle II detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 362 fb⁻¹. The event yields are extracted from fits to the distributions of the difference between expected and observedBmeson energy, and are efficiency-corrected as a function ofm(K⁻$$ {K}_{(S)}^{\left(\ast \right)0} $$ $K_{\left(S\right)}^{\left(\ast \right)0}$) andm(D^(*)$$ {K}_{(S)}^{\left(\ast \right)0} $$ $K_{\left(S\right)}^{\left(\ast \right)0}$) in order to avoid dependence on the decay model. These results include the first observation of$$ {\overline{B}}^0 $$ ${\overline{B}}^0$→D⁺K⁻$$ {K}_S^0 $$ $K_S^0$,B⁻→D*⁰K⁻$$ {K}_S^0 $$ $K_S^0$, and$$ {\overline{B}}^0 $$ ${\overline{B}}^0$→D*⁺K⁻$$ {K}_S^0 $$ $K_S^0$decays and a significant improvement in the precision of the other channels compared to previous measurements. The helicity-angle distributions and the invariant mass distributions of theK⁻$$ {K}_{(S)}^{\left(\ast \right)0} $$ $K_{\left(S\right)}^{\left(\ast \right)0}$systems are compatible with quasi-two-body decays via a resonant transition with spin-parityJ^P= 1⁻for theK⁻$$ {K}_S^0 $$ $K_S^0$systems andJ^P= 1⁺for theK⁻K*⁰systems. We also present measurements of the branching fractions of four$$ {\overline{B}}^0 $$ ${\overline{B}}^0$→D^(*)+$$ {D}_s^{-} $$ $D_s^{-}$,B⁻→D^(*)0$$ {D}_s^{-} $$ $D_s^{-}$decay channels with a precision compatible to the current world averages. 

   more » « less
5. Measurement of the inclusive $$ \textrm{t}\overline{\textrm{t}} $$ cross section in final states with at least one lepton and additional jets with 302 pb−1 of pp collisions at $$ \sqrt{\textrm{s}} $$ = 5.02 TeV

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2025)099  

   Hayrapetyan, A; Tumasyan, A; Adam, W; Andrejkovic, J W; Bergauer, T; Chatterjee, S; Damanakis, K; Dragicevic, M; Hussain, P S; Jeitler, M; et al (April 2025, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> A measurement of the top quark pair ($$ \textrm{t}\overline{\textrm{t}} $$ $t\overline{t}$) production cross section in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV is presented. The data were collected at the LHC in autumn 2017, in dedicated runs with low-energy and low-intensity conditions with respect to the default configuration, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 302 pb⁻¹. The measurement is performed using events with one electron or muon, and multiple jets, at least one of them being identified as originating from a b quark (b tagged). Events are classified based on the number of all reconstructed jets and of b-tagged jets. Multivariate analysis techniques are used to enhance the separation between the signal and backgrounds. The measured cross section is$$ 62.5\pm 1.6{\left(\textrm{stat}\right)}_{-2.5}^{+2.6}\left(\textrm{syst}\right)\pm 1.2\left(\textrm{lumi}\right) $$ $62.5\pm 1.6{\left(\text{stat}\right)}_{-2.5}^{+2.6}\left(\text{syst}\right)\pm 1.2\left(\text{lumi}\right)$pb. A combination with the result in the dilepton channel based on the same data set yields a value of 62.3 ± 1.5 (stat) ± 2.4 (syst) ± 1.2 (lumi) pb, to be compared with the standard model prediction of$$ {69.5}_{-3.7}^{+3.5} $$ ${69.5}_{-3.7}^{+3.5}$pb at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative quantum chromodynamics. 

   more » « less