More Like this

1. A case study of SMEFT $$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ effects in diboson processes: pp → W±(ℓ±ν)γ

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2024)223  

   Martin, Adam ( May 2024 , Journal of High Energy Physics)

   In this paper we explorepp→W^±(ℓ^±ν)γto$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$$O\left(1/{\Lambda }^4\right)$in the SMEFT expansion. Calculations to this order are necessary to properly capture SMEFT contributions that grow with energy, as the interference between energy-enhanced SMEFT effects at$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^2\right) $$$O\left(1/{\Lambda }^2\right)$and the Standard Model is suppressed. We find that there are several dimension eight operators that interfere with the Standard Model and lead to the same energy growth, ~$$ \mathcal{O}\left({E}^4/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$$O\left(E^4/{\Lambda }^4\right)$, as dimension six squared. While energy-enhanced SMEFT contributions are a main focus, our calculation includes the complete set of$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$$O\left(1/{\Lambda }^4\right)$SMEFT effects consistent with U(3)⁵flavor symmetry. Additionally, we include the decay of theW^±→ ℓ^±ν, making the calculation actually$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {\ell}^{\pm}\nu \gamma $$$\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to {\ell }^{\pm }\mathrm{\nu \gamma }$. As such, we are able to study the impact of non-resonant SMEFT operators, such as$$ \left({L}^{\dagger }{\overline{\sigma}}^{\mu }{\tau}^IL\right)\left({Q}^{\dagger }{\overline{\sigma}}^{\nu }{\tau}^IQ\right) $$$\left(L^{†}{\overline{\sigma }}^{\mu }{\tau }^{I}L\right)\left(Q^{†}{\overline{\sigma }}^{\nu }{\tau }^{I}Q\right)$B_μν, which contribute to$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {\ell}^{\pm}\nu \gamma $$$\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to {\ell }^{\pm }\mathrm{\nu \gamma }$directly and not to$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {W}^{\pm}\gamma $$$\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to W^{\pm }\gamma$. We show several distributions to illustrate the shape differences of the different contributions.

    

   more » « less
2. Measurement of the e+e− → $$ {B}_s^0{\overline{B}}_s^0X $$ cross section in the energy range from 10.63 to 11.02 GeV using inclusive $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ and D0 production

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2023)131  

   Zhukova, V ; Mizuk, R ; Adachi, I ; Aihara, H ; Al_Said, S ; Asner, D M ; Atmacan, H ; Aulchenko, V ; Aushev, T ; Ayad, R ; et al ( August 2023 , Journal of High Energy Physics)

   We report the first measurement of the inclusivee⁺e⁻→$$ b\overline{b} $$$b\overline{b}$→$$ {D}_s^{\pm } $$$D_s^{\pm }$Xande⁺e⁻→$$ b\overline{b} $$$b\overline{b}$→ D⁰/$$ {\overline{D}}^0 $$${\overline{D}}^0$Xcross sections in the energy range from 10.63 to 11.02 GeV. Based on these results, we determineσ(e⁺e⁻→$$ {B}_s^0{\overline{B}}_s^0 $$$B_s^0{\overline{B}}_s^0$X) andσ(e⁺e⁻→$$ B\overline{B} $$$B\overline{B}$X) in the same energy range. We measure the fraction of$$ {B}_s^0 $$$B_s^0$events at Υ(10860) to bef_s= ($$ {22.0}_{-2.1}^{+2.0} $$${22.0}_{-2.1}^{+2.0}$)%. We determine also the ratio of the$$ {B}_s^0 $$$B_s^0$inclusive branching fractions$$ \mathcal{B} $$$B$($$ {B}_s^0 $$$B_s^0$→ D⁰/$$ {\overline{D}}^0 $$${\overline{D}}^0$X)/$$ \mathcal{B} $$$B$($$ {B}_s^0 $$$B_s^0$→$$ {D}_s^{\pm } $$$D_s^{\pm }$X) = 0.416 ± 0.018 ± 0.092. The results are obtained using the data collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energye⁺e⁻collider.

    

   more » « less
3. Search for the $$ {B}_s^0 $$ → μ+μ−γ decay

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2024)101  

   Aaij, R ; Abdelmotteleb, A_S W ; Abellan_Beteta, C ; Abudinén, F ; Ackernley, T ; Adefisoye, A A ; Adeva, B ; Adinolfi, M ; Adlarson, P ; Agapopoulou, C ; et al ( July 2024 , Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A search for the fully reconstructed$$ {B}_s^0 $$$B_s^0$→ μ⁺μ⁻γdecay is performed at the LHCb experiment using proton-proton collisions at$$ \sqrt{s} $$$\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.4 fb⁻¹. No significant signal is found and upper limits on the branching fraction in intervals of the dimuon mass are set$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{cc}\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)\in \left[2{m}_{\mu },1.70\right]\textrm{GeV}/{c}^2,\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\gamma \right)<7.7\times {10}^{-8},&\ m\left({\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)\in \left[\textrm{1.70,2.88}\right]\textrm{GeV}/{c}^2,\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)\in \left[3.92,{m}_{B_s^0}\right]\textrm{GeV}/{c}^2,\end{array}} $$$\begin{array}{cc}B\left(B_s^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)\in \left(2m_{\mu },1.70\right)\mathrm{GeV}/c^2,\\ B\left(B_s^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\gamma \right)<7.7\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)\in \left(\mathrm{1.70,\; 2.88}\right)\mathrm{GeV}/c^2,\\ B\left(B_s^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)\in \left(3.92,m_{B_s^0}\right)\mathrm{GeV}/c^2,\end{array}$

   at 95% confidence level. Additionally, upper limits are set on the branching fraction in the [2m_μ,1.70] GeV/c²dimuon mass region excluding the contribution from the intermediateϕ(1020) meson, and in the region combining all dimuon-mass intervals.

    

   more » « less
4. Observation of the $${{{\Lambda }} _{\text {b}}^{{0}}} \rightarrow {{\text {J}/\uppsi }} {{{\Xi }} ^{{-}}} {{\text {K}} ^{{+}}} $$ decay

   https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13114-9  

   Hayrapetyan, A ; Tumasyan, A ; Adam, W ; Andrejkovic, J W ; Bergauer, T ; Chatterjee, S ; Damanakis, K ; Dragicevic, M ; Valle, A_Escalante Del ; Hussain, P S ; et al ( October 2024 , The European Physical Journal C)

   Using proton–proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of$$140\hbox { fb}^{-1}$$$140{\text{fb}}^{-1}$collected by the CMS experiment at$$\sqrt{s}= 13\,\text {Te}\hspace{-.08em}\text {V} $$$\sqrt{s}=13\text{Te}\text{V}$, the$${{{\Lambda }} _{\text {b}}^{{0}}} \rightarrow {{\text {J}/\uppsi }} {{{\Xi }} ^{{-}}} {{\text {K}} ^{{+}}} $$${\Lambda }_{\text{b}}^0\to \text{J}/\psi {\Xi }^{-}{\text{K}}^{+}$decay is observed for the first time, with a statistical significance exceeding 5 standard deviations. The relative branching fraction, with respect to the$${{{\Lambda }} _{\text {b}}^{{0}}} \rightarrow {{{\uppsi }} ({2\textrm{S}})} {{\Lambda }} $$${\Lambda }_{\text{b}}^0\to \psi \left(2\text{S}\right)\Lambda$decay, is measured to be$$\mathcal {B}({{{\Lambda }} _{\text {b}}^{{0}}} \rightarrow {{\text {J}/\uppsi }} {{{\Xi }} ^{{-}}} {{\text {K}} ^{{+}}} )/\mathcal {B}({{{\Lambda }} _{\text {b}}^{{0}}} \rightarrow {{{\uppsi }} ({2\textrm{S}})} {{\Lambda }} ) = [3.38\pm 1.02\pm 0.61\pm 0.03]\%$$$B({\Lambda }_{\text{b}}^0\to \text{J}/\psi {\Xi }^{-}{\text{K}}^{+})/B({\Lambda }_{\text{b}}^0\to \psi \left(2\text{S}\right)\Lambda )=[3.38\pm 1.02\pm 0.61\pm 0.03]\%$, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is related to the uncertainties in$$\mathcal {B}({{{\uppsi }} ({2\textrm{S}})} \rightarrow {{\text {J}/\uppsi }} {{{\uppi }} ^{{+}}} {{{\uppi }} ^{{-}}} )$$$B(\psi \left(2\text{S}\right)\to \text{J}/\psi {\pi }^{+}{\pi }^{-})$and$$\mathcal {B}({{{\Xi }} ^{{-}}} \rightarrow {{\Lambda }} {{{\uppi }} ^{{-}}} )$$$B({\Xi }^{-}\to \Lambda {\pi }^{-})$.

    

   more » « less
5. Spin density matrix elements in exclusive $$\rho ^0$$ meson muoproduction

   https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11359-4  

   Alexeev, G D ; Alexeev, M G ; Alice, C ; Amoroso, A ; Andrieux, V ; Anosov, V ; Augsten, K ; Augustyniak, W ; Azevedo, C_D R ; Badelek, B ; et al ( October 2023 , The European Physical Journal C)

   We report on a measurement of Spin Density Matrix Elements (SDMEs) in hard exclusive$$\rho ^0$$${\rho }^0$meson muoproduction at COMPASS using 160 GeV/cpolarised$$ \mu ^{+}$$${\mu }^{+}$and$$ \mu ^{-}$$${\mu }^{-}$beams impinging on a liquid hydrogen target. The measurement covers the kinematic range 5.0 GeV/$$c^2$$$c^2$$$< W<$$$<W<$17.0 GeV/$$c^2$$$c^2$, 1.0 (GeV/c)$$^2$$${}^2$$$< Q^2<$$$<Q^2<$10.0 (GeV/c)$$^2$$${}^2$and 0.01 (GeV/c)$$^2$$${}^2$$$< p_{\textrm{T}}^2<$$$<p_{\text{T}}^2<$0.5 (GeV/c)$$^2$$${}^2$. Here,Wdenotes the mass of the final hadronic system,$$Q^2$$$Q^2$the virtuality of the exchanged photon, and$$p_{\textrm{T}}$$$p_{\text{T}}$the transverse momentum of the$$\rho ^0$$${\rho }^0$meson with respect to the virtual-photon direction. The measured non-zero SDMEs for the transitions of transversely polarised virtual photons to longitudinally polarised vector mesons ($$\gamma ^*_T \rightarrow V^{ }_L$$${\gamma }_T^{\ast }\to V_L^{}$) indicate a violation ofs-channel helicity conservation. Additionally, we observe a dominant contribution of natural-parity-exchange transitions and a very small contribution of unnatural-parity-exchange transitions, which is compatible with zero within experimental uncertainties. The results provide important input for modelling Generalised Parton Distributions (GPDs). In particular, they may allow one to evaluate in a model-dependent way the role of parton helicity-flip GPDs in exclusive$$\rho ^0$$${\rho }^0$production.

    

   more » « less