More Like this

1. Measurement of the energy dependence of the e+e− → $$ B\overline{B} $$, $$ B{\overline{B}}^{\ast } $$, and $$ {B}^{\ast }{\overline{B}}^{\ast } $$ cross sections at Belle II

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2024)114  

   Adachi, I; Aggarwal, L; Ahmed, H; Aihara, H; Akopov, N; Aloisio, A; Althubiti, N; Anh_Ky, N; Asner, D M; Atmacan, H; et al (October 2024, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> We report measurements of thee⁺e⁻→$$ B\overline{B} $$ $B\overline{B}$,$$ B{\overline{B}}^{\ast } $$ $B{\overline{B}}^{\ast }$, and$$ {B}^{\ast }{\overline{B}}^{\ast } $$ $B^{\ast }{\overline{B}}^{\ast }$cross sections at four energies, 10653, 10701, 10746 and 10805 MeV, using data collected by the Belle II experiment. We reconstruct oneBmeson in a large number of hadronic final states and use its momentum to identify the production process. In the first 2 – 5 MeV above$$ {B}^{\ast }{\overline{B}}^{\ast } $$ $B^{\ast }{\overline{B}}^{\ast }$threshold, thee⁺e⁻→$$ {B}^{\ast }{\overline{B}}^{\ast } $$ $B^{\ast }{\overline{B}}^{\ast }$cross section increases rapidly. This may indicate the presence of a pole close to the threshold. 

   more » « less
2. Measurements of branching fractions and asymmetry parameters of $$ {\Xi}_c^0\to \Lambda {\overline{K}}^{\ast 0} $$, $$ {\Xi}_c^0\to {\Sigma}^0{\overline{K}}^{\ast 0} $$, and $$ {\Xi}_c^0\to {\Sigma}^{+}{K}^{\ast -} $$ decays at Belle

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2021)160  

   Jia, S.; Tang, S. S.; Shen, C. P.; Adachi, I.; Aihara, H.; Al Said, S.; Asner, D. M.; Aulchenko, V.; Aushev, T.; Ayad, R.; et al (June 2021, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A bstract Using a data sample of 980 fb − 1 collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy e + e − collider, we study the processes of $$ {\Xi}_c^0\to \Lambda {\overline{K}}^{\ast 0} $$ Ξ c 0 → Λ K ¯ ∗ 0 , $$ {\Xi}_c^0\to {\Sigma}^0{\overline{K}}^{\ast 0} $$ Ξ c 0 → Σ 0 K ¯ ∗ 0 , and $$ {\Xi}_c^0\to {\Sigma}^{+}{K}^{\ast -} $$ Ξ c 0 → Σ + K ∗ − for the first time. The relative branching ratios to the normalization mode of $$ {\Xi}_c^0\to {\Xi}^{-}{\pi}^{+} $$ Ξ c 0 → Ξ − π + are measured to be $$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\mathcal{B}\left({\Xi}_c^0\to \Lambda {\overline{K}}^{\ast 0}\right)/\mathcal{B}\left({\Xi}_c^0\to {\Xi}^{-}{\pi}^{+}\right)=0.18\pm 0.02\left(\mathrm{stat}.\right)\pm 0.01\left(\mathrm{syst}.\right),\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({\Xi}_c^0\to {\Sigma}^0{\overline{K}}^{\ast 0}\right)/\mathcal{B}\left({\Xi}_c^0\to {\Xi}^{-}{\pi}^{+}\right)=0.69\pm 0.03\left(\mathrm{stat}.\right)\pm 0.03\left(\mathrm{syst}.\right),\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({\Xi}_c^0\to {\Sigma}^{+}{K}^{\ast -}\right)/\mathcal{B}\left({\Xi}_c^0\to {\Xi}^{-}{\pi}^{+}\right)=0.34\pm 0.06\left(\mathrm{stat}.\right)\pm 0.02\left(\mathrm{syst}.\right),\end{array}} $$ B Ξ c 0 → Λ K ¯ ∗ 0 / B Ξ c 0 → Ξ − π + = 0.18 ± 0.02 stat . ± 0.01 syst . , B Ξ c 0 → Σ 0 K ¯ ∗ 0 / B Ξ c 0 → Ξ − π + = 0.69 ± 0.03 stat . ± 0.03 syst . , B Ξ c 0 → Σ + K ∗ − / B Ξ c 0 → Ξ − π + = 0.34 ± 0.06 stat . ± 0.02 syst . , where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. We obtain $$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\mathcal{B}\left({\Xi}_c^0\to \Lambda {\overline{K}}^{\ast 0}\right)=\left(3.3\pm 0.3\left(\mathrm{stat}.\right)\pm 0.2\left(\mathrm{syst}.\right)\pm 1.0\left(\mathrm{ref}.\right)\right)\times {10}^{-3},\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({\Xi}_c^0\to {\Sigma}^0{\overline{K}}^{\ast 0}\right)=\left(12.4\pm 0.5\left(\mathrm{stat}.\right)\pm 0.5\left(\mathrm{syst}.\right)\pm 3.6\left(\mathrm{ref}.\right)\right)\times {10}^{-3},\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({\Xi}_c^0\to {\Sigma}^{+}{K}^{\ast 0}\right)=\left(6.1\pm 1.0\left(\mathrm{stat}.\right)\pm 0.4\left(\mathrm{syst}.\right)\pm 1.8\left(\mathrm{ref}.\right)\right)\times {10}^{-3},\end{array}} $$ B Ξ c 0 → Λ K ¯ ∗ 0 = 3.3 ± 0.3 stat . ± 0.2 syst . ± 1.0 ref . × 10 − 3 , B Ξ c 0 → Σ 0 K ¯ ∗ 0 = 12.4 ± 0.5 stat . ± 0.5 syst . ± 3.6 ref . × 10 − 3 , B Ξ c 0 → Σ + K ∗ 0 = 6.1 ± 1.0 stat . ± 0.4 syst . ± 1.8 ref . × 10 − 3 , where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and from $$ \mathcal{B}\left({\Xi}_c^0\to {\Xi}^{-}{\pi}^{+}\right) $$ B Ξ c 0 → Ξ − π + , respectively. The asymmetry parameters $$ \alpha \left({\Xi}_c^0\to \Lambda {\overline{K}}^{\ast 0}\right) $$ α Ξ c 0 → Λ K ¯ ∗ 0 and $$ \alpha \left({\Xi}_c^0\to {\Sigma}^{+}{K}^{\ast -}\right) $$ α Ξ c 0 → Σ + K ∗ − are 0 . 15 ± 0 . 22(stat . ) ± 0 . 04(syst . ) and − 0 . 52 ± 0 . 30(stat . ) ± 0 . 02(syst . ), respectively, where the uncertainties are statistical followed by systematic. 

   more » « less
3. Measurement of the e+e− → $$ {B}_s^0{\overline{B}}_s^0X $$ cross section in the energy range from 10.63 to 11.02 GeV using inclusive $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ and D0 production

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2023)131  

   Zhukova, V; Mizuk, R; Adachi, I; Aihara, H; Al_Said, S; Asner, D M; Atmacan, H; Aulchenko, V; Aushev, T; Ayad, R; et al (August 2023, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> We report the first measurement of the inclusivee⁺e⁻→$$ b\overline{b} $$ $b\overline{b}$→$$ {D}_s^{\pm } $$ $D_s^{\pm }$Xande⁺e⁻→$$ b\overline{b} $$ $b\overline{b}$→ D⁰/$$ {\overline{D}}^0 $$ ${\overline{D}}^0$Xcross sections in the energy range from 10.63 to 11.02 GeV. Based on these results, we determineσ(e⁺e⁻→$$ {B}_s^0{\overline{B}}_s^0 $$ $B_s^0{\overline{B}}_s^0$X) andσ(e⁺e⁻→$$ B\overline{B} $$ $B\overline{B}$X) in the same energy range. We measure the fraction of$$ {B}_s^0 $$ $B_s^0$events at Υ(10860) to bef_s= ($$ {22.0}_{-2.1}^{+2.0} $$ ${22.0}_{-2.1}^{+2.0}$)%. We determine also the ratio of the$$ {B}_s^0 $$ $B_s^0$inclusive branching fractions$$ \mathcal{B} $$ $B$($$ {B}_s^0 $$ $B_s^0$→ D⁰/$$ {\overline{D}}^0 $$ ${\overline{D}}^0$X)/$$ \mathcal{B} $$ $B$($$ {B}_s^0 $$ $B_s^0$→$$ {D}_s^{\pm } $$ $D_s^{\pm }$X) = 0.416 ± 0.018 ± 0.092. The results are obtained using the data collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energye⁺e⁻collider. 

   more » « less
4. Angular analysis of $$ {B}^0\to {D}^{\ast -}{D}_s^{\ast +} $$ with $$ {D}_s^{\ast +}\to {D}_s^{+}\gamma $$ decays

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2021)177  

   Aaij, R.; Abellán Beteta, C.; Ackernley, T.; Adeva, B.; Adinolfi, M.; Afsharnia, H.; Aidala, C. A.; Aiola, S.; Ajaltouni, Z.; Akar, S.; et al (June 2021, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A bstract The first full angular analysis of the $$ {B}^0\to {D}^{\ast -}{D}_s^{\ast +} $$ B 0 → D ∗ − D s ∗ + decay is performed using 6 fb − 1 of pp collision data collected with the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The $$ {D}_s^{\ast +}\to {D}_s^{+}\gamma $$ D s ∗ + → D s + γ and D * − → $$ {\overline{D}}^0{\pi}^{-} $$ D ¯ 0 π − vector meson decays are used with the subsequent $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ D s + → K + K − π + and $$ {\overline{D}}^0 $$ D ¯ 0 → K + π − decays. All helicity amplitudes and phases are measured, and the longitudinal polarisation fraction is determined to be f L = 0 . 578 ± 0 . 010 ± 0 . 011 with world-best precision, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. The pattern of helicity amplitude magnitudes is found to align with expectations from quark-helicity conservation in B decays. The ratio of branching fractions [ℬ( $$ {B}^0\to {D}^{\ast -}{D}_s^{\ast +} $$ B 0 → D ∗ − D s ∗ + ) × ℬ( $$ {D}_s^{\ast +}\to {D}_s^{+}\gamma $$ D s ∗ + → D s + γ )] / ℬ( B 0 → D * − $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ D s + ) is measured to be 2 . 045 ± 0 . 022 ± 0 . 071 with world-best precision. In addition, the first observation of the Cabibbo-suppressed B s → D * − $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ D s + decay is made with a significance of seven standard deviations. The branching fraction ratio ℬ( B s → D * − $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ D s + ) / ℬ( B 0 → D * − $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ D s + ) is measured to be 0 . 049 ± 0 . 006 ± 0 . 003 ± 0 . 002, where the third uncertainty is due to limited knowledge of the ratio of fragmentation fractions. 

   more » « less
5. New physics searches via angular distributions of $$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast}\left(\to D\pi \right)\tau \left(\to \ell {\nu}_{\tau }{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell}\right){\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } $$ decays

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2025)135  

   Bhattacharya, Bhubanjyoti; Browder, Thomas E; Datta, Alakabha; Kapoor, Tejhas; Kou, Emi; Mukherjee, Lopamudra (April 2025, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   The study of $$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } $$angular distribution can be used to obtain information about new physics (or beyond the Standard Model) couplings, which are motivated by various B anomalies. However, the inability to measure precisely the three-momentum of the lepton hinders such measurements, as the tau decay contains one or more undetected neutrinos. Here, we present a measurable angular distribution of $$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } $$ by considering the additional decay $$ \tau \to \ell {\nu}_{\tau }{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell } $$, wℓ. The full process used is$$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast}\left(\to D\pi \right)\tau \left(\to \ell {\nu}_{\tau }{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell}\right){\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } $$ $\overline{B}\to D^{\ast }\left(\to \mathrm{D\pi }\right)\tau \left(\to \ell {\nu }_{\tau }{\overline{\nu }}_{\ell }\right){\overline{\nu }}_{\tau }$, in which only theℓandD^*are reconstructed. A fit to the experimental angular distribution of this process can be used to extract information on new physics parameters. To demonstrate the feasibility of this approach, we generate simulated data for this process and perform a sensitivity study to obtain the expected statistical errors on new physics parameters from experiments in the near future. We obtain a sensitivity of the order of 5% for the right-handed current and around 6% for the tensor current. In addition, we use the recent lattice QCD data onB→D^*form factors and obtain correlations between form factors and new physics parameters. 

   more » « less