More Like this

1. Relative importance of convective uncertainties in massive stars

   https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1595  

   Kaiser, Etienne A; Hirschi, Raphael; Arnett, W David; Georgy, Cyril; Scott, Laura J; Cristini, Andrea (August 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)

   ABSTRACT In this work, we investigate the impact of uncertainties due to convective boundary mixing (CBM), commonly called ‘overshoot’, namely the boundary location and the amount of mixing at the convective boundary, on stellar structure and evolution. For this we calculated two grids of stellar evolution models with the MESA code, each with the Ledoux and the Schwarzschild boundary criterion, and vary the amount of CBM. We calculate each grid with the initial masses of 15, 20, and $$25\, \rm {M}_\odot$$. We present the stellar structure of the models during the hydrogen and helium burning phases. In the latter, we examine the impact on the nucleosynthesis. We find a broadening of the main sequence with more CBM, which is more in agreement with observations. Furthermore, during the core hydrogen burning phase there is a convergence of the convective boundary location due to CBM. The uncertainties of the intermediate convective zone remove this convergence. The behaviour of this convective zone strongly affects the surface evolution of the model, i.e. how fast it evolves redwards. The amount of CBM impacts the size of the convective cores and the nucleosynthesis, e.g. the 12C to 16O ratio and the weak s-process. Lastly, we determine the uncertainty that the range of parameter values investigated introduces and we find differences of up to $$70{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$$ for the core masses and the total mass of the star. 

   more » « less
2. Solar Elemental Abundances

   Lodders, K (December 2020, Online Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Planetary Science. Oxford University Press 2020)

   olar elemental abundances, or solar system elemental abundances refer to the complement of chemical elements in the entire solar system. The sun contains more than 99-percent of the mass in the solar system and therefore the composition of the sun is a good proxy for the composition of the overall solar system. The solar system composition can be taken as the overall composition of the molecular cloud within the interstellar medium from which the solar system formed 4.567 billion years ago. Active research areas in astronomy and cosmochemistry model collapse of a molecular cloud of solar composition into a star with a planetary system, and the physical and chemical fractionation of the elements during planetary formation and differentiation. The solar system composition is the initial composition from which all solar system objects (the sun, terrestrial planets, gas giant planets, planetary satellites and moons, asteroids, Kuiper-belt objects, and comets) were derived. Other dwarf stars (with hydrostatic Hydrogen-burning in their cores) like our Sun (type G2V dwarf star) within the solar neighborhood have compositions similar to our Sun and the solar system composition. In general, differential comparisons of stellar compositions provide insights about stellar evolution as functions of stellar mass and age, and ongoing nucleosynthesis; but also about galactic chemical evolution when elemental compositions of stellar populations across our Milky Way Galaxy is considered. Comparisons to solar composition can reveal element destruction (e.g., Li) in the sun and in other dwarf stars. The comparisons also show element production of e.g., C, N, O, and the heavy elements made by the s-process in low- to intermediate mass stars (3-7 solar masses) after these evolved from their dwarf-star stage into red giant stars (where hydrogen and helium burning can occur in shells around their cores). The solar system abundances are and have been a critical test composition for nucleosynthesis models and models of Galactic chemical evolution, which aim ultimately to track the production of the elements heavier than hydrogen and helium in the generation of stars that came forth after the Big Bang 13.4 billion years ago. Article at: https://oxfordre.com/planetaryscience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.001.0001/acrefore-9780190647926-e-145 

   more » « less
3. Realistic 3D hydrodynamics simulations find significant turbulent entrainment in massive stars

   https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1981  

   Rizzuti, F.; Hirschi, R.; Georgy, C.; Arnett, W. D.; Meakin, C.; Murphy, A. StJ (July 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)

   ABSTRACT Our understanding of stellar structure and evolution coming from one-dimensional (1D) stellar models is limited by uncertainties related to multidimensional processes taking place in stellar interiors. 1D models, however, can now be tested and improved with the help of detailed three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamics models, which can reproduce complex multidimensional processes over short time-scales, thanks to the recent advances in computing resources. Among these processes, turbulent entrainment leading to mixing across convective boundaries is one of the least understood and most impactful. Here, we present the results from a set of hydrodynamics simulations of the neon-burning shell in a massive star, and interpret them in the framework of the turbulent entrainment law from geophysics. Our simulations differ from previous studies in their unprecedented degree of realism in reproducing the stellar environment. Importantly, the strong entrainment found in the simulations highlights the major flaws of the current implementation of convective boundary mixing in 1D stellar models. This study therefore calls for major revisions of how convective boundaries are modelled in 1D, and in particular the implementation of entrainment in these models. This will have important implications for supernova theory, nucleosynthesis, neutron stars, and black holes physics. 

   more » « less
4. The radioactive nuclei and in the Cosmos and in the solar system

   https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2021.48  

   Diehl, R.; Lugaro, M.; Heger, A.; Sieverding, A.; Tang, X.; Li, K. A.; Li, E. T.; Doherty, C. L.; Krause, M. G.; Wallner, A.; et al (January 2021, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia)

   Abstract The cosmic evolution of the chemical elements from the Big Bang to the present time is driven by nuclear fusion reactions inside stars and stellar explosions. A cycle of matter recurrently re-processes metal-enriched stellar ejecta into the next generation of stars. The study of cosmic nucleosynthesis and this matter cycle requires the understanding of the physics of nuclear reactions, of the conditions at which the nuclear reactions are activated inside the stars and stellar explosions, of the stellar ejection mechanisms through winds and explosions, and of the transport of the ejecta towards the next cycle, from hot plasma to cold, star-forming gas. Due to the long timescales of stellar evolution, and because of the infrequent occurrence of stellar explosions, observational studies are challenging, as they have biases in time and space as well as different sensitivities related to the various astronomical methods. Here, we describe in detail the astrophysical and nuclear-physical processes involved in creating two radioactive isotopes useful in such studies, $$^{26}\mathrm{Al}$$ and $$^{60}\mathrm{Fe}$$ . Due to their radioactive lifetime of the order of a million years, these isotopes are suitable to characterise simultaneously the processes of nuclear fusion reactions and of interstellar transport. We describe and discuss the nuclear reactions involved in the production and destruction of $$^{26}\mathrm{Al}$$ and $$^{60}\mathrm{Fe}$$ , the key characteristics of the stellar sites of their nucleosynthesis and their interstellar journey after ejection from the nucleosynthesis sites. This allows us to connect the theoretical astrophysical aspects to the variety of astronomical messengers presented here, from stardust and cosmic-ray composition measurements, through observation of $$\gamma$$ rays produced by radioactivity, to material deposited in deep-sea ocean crusts and to the inferred composition of the first solids that have formed in the Solar System. We show that considering measurements of the isotopic ratio of $$^{26}\mathrm{Al}$$ to $$^{60}\mathrm{Fe}$$ eliminate some of the unknowns when interpreting astronomical results, and discuss the lessons learned from these two isotopes on cosmic chemical evolution. This review paper has emerged from an ISSI-BJ Team project in 2017–2019, bringing together nuclear physicists, astronomers, and astrophysicists in this inter-disciplinary discussion. 

   more » « less
5. The 3-Helium Problem

   Balser, D.; Bania, T. (January 2020, American Astronomical Society meeting #235)

   The light element 3He is produced in copious amounts during the first three minutes after the Big Bang. The 3He abundance is then modified primarily by nucleosynthesis in stars, whereby low-mass stars (< 2 solar masses) are expected to produce 3He due to the astration of deuterium. The higher temperatues in more massive stars fuse 3He completely into 4He thus destroying 3He. Measurements of 3He are made via observations of the hyperfine transition of 3He+ at 3.46 cm. Observations of 3He+ in HII regions located throughout the Milky Way disk reveal very little variation in the 3He/H abundance ratio — the "3He Plateau", indicating that the net effect of 3He production in stars is negligible. This is in contrast to much higher 3He/H abundance ratios found in some planetary nebula (PNe). This discrepancy is known as the "3He Problem." One solution to this problem is that thermohaline mixing occurs just above the hydrogen-burning shell to process 3-Helium: 3He(3He, 2p)4He. Thermohaline mixing is a double-diffusive instability that occurs in oceans and is also called thermohaline convection. We discuss how more accurate observations of the 3He/H abundance ratio can constrain stellar evolution models that include thermohaline mixing. 

   more » « less