More Like this

1. Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi6308  

   Rosenthal, Gil G.; Ryan, Michael J. (January 2022, Science)

   BACKGROUND Charles Darwin’s  Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex  tackled the two main controversies arising from the Origin of Species:  the evolution of humans from animal ancestors and the evolution of sexual ornaments. Most of the book focuses on the latter, Darwin’s theory of sexual selection. Research since supports his conjecture that songs, perfumes, and intricate dances evolve because they help secure mating partners. Evidence is overwhelming for a primary role of both male and female mate choice in sexual selection—not only through premating courtship but also through intimate interactions during and long after mating. But what makes one prospective mate more enticing than another? Darwin, shaped by misogyny and sexual prudery, invoked a “taste for the beautiful” without speculating on the origin of the “taste.” How to explain when the “final marriage ceremony” is between two rams? What of oral sex in bats, cloacal rubbing in bonobos, or the sexual spectrum in humans, all observable in Darwin’s time? By explaining desire through the lens of those male traits that caught his eyes and those of his gender and culture, Darwin elided these data in his theory of sexual evolution. Work since Darwin has focused on how traits and preferences coevolve. Preferences can evolve even if attractive signals only predict offspring attractiveness, but most attention has gone to the intuitive but tenuous premise that mating with gorgeous partners yields vigorous offspring. By focusing on those aspects of mating preferences that coevolve with male traits, many of Darwin’s influential followers have followed the same narrow path. The sexual selection debate in the 1980s was framed as “good genes versus runaway”: Do preferences coevolve with traits because traits predict genetic benefits, or simply because they are beautiful? To the broader world this is still the conversation. ADVANCES Even as they evolve toward ever-more-beautiful signals and healthier offspring, mate-choice mechanisms and courter traits are locked in an arms race of coercion and resistance, persuasion and skepticism. Traits favored by sexual selection often do so at the expense of chooser fitness, creating sexual conflict. Choosers then evolve preferences in response to the costs imposed by courters. Often, though, the current traits of courters tell us little about how preferences arise. Sensory systems are often tuned to nonsexual cues like food, favoring mating signals resembling those cues. And preferences can emerge simply from selection on choosing conspecifics. Sexual selection can therefore arise from chooser biases that have nothing to do with ornaments. Choice may occur before mating, as Darwin emphasized, but individuals mate multiple times and bias fertilization and offspring care toward favored partners. Mate choice can thus occur in myriad ways after mating, through behavioral, morphological, and physiological mechanisms. Like other biological traits, mating preferences vary among individuals and species along multiple dimensions. Some of this is likely adaptive, as different individuals will have different optimal mates. Indeed, mate choice may be more about choosing compatible partners than picking the “best” mate in the absolute sense. Compatibility-based choice can drive or reinforce genetic divergence and lead to speciation. The mechanisms underlying the “taste for the beautiful” determine whether mate choice accelerates or inhibits reproductive isolation. If preferences are learned from parents, or covary with ecological differences like the sensory environment, then choice can promote genetic divergence. If everyone shares preferences for attractive ornaments, then choice promotes gene flow between lineages. OUTLOOK Two major trends continue to shift the emphasis away from male “beauty” and toward how and why individuals make sexual choices. The first integrates neuroscience, genomics, and physiology. We need not limit ourselves to the feathers and dances that dazzled Darwin, which gives us a vastly richer picture of mate choice. The second is that despite persistent structural inequities in academia, a broader range of people study a broader range of questions. This new focus confirms Darwin’s insight that mate choice makes a primary contribution to sexual selection, but suggests that sexual selection is often tangential to mate choice. This conclusion challenges a persistent belief with sinister roots, whereby mate choice is all about male ornaments. Under this view, females evolve to prefer handsome males who provide healthy offspring, or alternatively, to express flighty whims for arbitrary traits. But mate-choice mechanisms also evolve for a host of other reasons Understanding mate choice mechanisms is key to understanding how sexual decisions underlie speciation and adaptation to environmental change. New theory and technology allow us to explicitly connect decision-making mechanisms with their evolutionary consequences. A century and a half after Darwin, we can shift our focus to females and males as choosers, rather than the gaudy by-products of mate choice. Mate choice mechanisms across domains of life. Sensory periphery for stimulus detection (yellow), brain for perceptual integration and evaluation (orange), and reproductive structures for postmating choice among pollen or sperm (teal). ILLUSTRATION: KELLIE HOLOSKI/ SCIENCE 

   more » « less
2. The role of mate competition in speciation and divergence: a systematic review

   https://doi.org/10.1093/jeb/voae111  

   Lackey, Alycia_C_R; Scordato, Elizabeth_S_C; Keagy, Jason; Tinghitella, Robin_M; Heathcote, Robert_J_P; Holman, ed., Luke; Hansson, ed., Bengt (September 2024, Journal of Evolutionary Biology)

   Abstract Competition for mates can play a critical role in determining reproductive success, shaping phenotypic variation within populations, and influencing divergence. Yet, studies of the role of sexual selection in divergence and speciation have focused disproportionately on mate choice. Here, we synthesize the literature on how mate competition may contribute to speciation and integrate concepts from work on sexual selection within populations—mating systems, ecology, and mate choice. Using this synthesis, we generate testable predictions for how mate competition may contribute to divergence. Then, we identify the extent of existing support for these predictions in the literature with a systematic review of the consequences of mate competition for population divergence across a range of evolutionary, ecological, and geographic contexts. We broadly evaluate current evidence, identify gaps in available data and hypotheses that need testing, and outline promising directions for future work. A major finding is that mate competition may commonly facilitate further divergence after initial divergence has occurred, e.g., upon secondary contact and between allopatric populations. Importantly, current hypotheses for how mate competition contributes to divergence do not fully explain observed patterns. While results from many studies fit predictions of negative frequency-dependent selection, agonistic character displacement, and ecological selection, results from ~30% of studies did not fit existing conceptual models. This review identifies future research aims for scenarios in which mate competition is likely important but has been understudied, including how ecological context and interactions between mate choice and mate competition can facilitate or hinder divergence and speciation. 

   more » « less
3. Complex choice environments shelter unattractive signallers from sexual selection

   https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.0585  

   Tanner, Jessie C; Shein-Idelson, Mark; Hoke, Kim L; Bee, Mark A (September 2025, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences)

   For many animals, options abound when choosing a mate in socially complex environments like a breeding chorus or lek. In such environments, receivers often choose their mate based on individual differences in signal repetition rate. However, signallers also differ in the regularity with which they produce repeated signals. Irregularity in signalling introduces uncertainty in decision-making by masking the among-individual variation in signalling rate that is a target of mate choice. At present, we know little about how the complexity of the choice environment affects selection on rate and regularity, two signalling behaviours that receivers can only compare after sampling series of signals produced by multiple signallers. In this study of female grey treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis), we measured multivariate sexual selection on the rate and regularity of male calling behaviour using two-, four- and eight-choice tests. Receivers overwhelmingly chose faster, more regular calling rates in two-choice tests, but did so markedly less often when they chose among four or eight stimuli. Sexual selection imposed by female choice became markedly weaker and differently shaped as the complexity of the social environment increased, suggesting noise and choice overload effects may allow relatively unattractive males to mate. 

   more » « less
4. The role of cuticular hydrocarbon sexual dimorphism on Drosophila courtship

   Cong, Haosu; Luo, Mei; Chowdanayaka, Rajanikanth; Sbisa, Nadia; Wang, Zinan; Pu, Jian; Chung, Henry (September 2025, Animal behaviour)

   The evolution of mating signals is shaped by divergent roles and selective forces, which allow these signals to become multifunctional. Sexual dimorphism in mating signals can reflect this multifunctionality, where such dimorphism could contribute to both mate recognition and mate choice. Sexual dimorphism in mating signals is thought to arise due to divergent sex roles, driven by the interactions of several selective pressures. It has been suggested that, across taxa, both sexes can be choosy and result in sexual selection. However, whether sexual dimorphism in mating signals can predict its role in male courtship behaviour is still unclear. In this study, we used cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in Drosophila species as a model to investigate the question, with CHCs serving as key chemical cues during courtship. This study investigates the relationship between CHC sexual dimorphism and its role in male courtship behaviour across 10 Drosophila species. Our results reveal variations in the degree of CHC sexual dimorphism across the test species. In addition, CHC detection was found to contribute to courtship initiation in most of the test species, but CHC sexual dimorphism did not predict male courtship behaviour. Notably, a longer courtship latency was observed following the loss of CHC detection, indicating that CHCs may convey information on mate quality. Our study suggests that sexual dimorphism in CHCs is not directly linked to its role in mating signal recognition and highlights the species-specific evolution of chemical signals in Drosophila courtship. 

   more » « less
5. Complex choice environments shelter unattractive signallers from sexual selection

   https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.gb5mkkx1v  

   Tanner, Jessie; Shein-Idelson, Mark; Hoke, Kim; Bee, Mark (July 2025, Dryad)

   For many animals, options abound when choosing a mate in socially complex environments like a breeding chorus or lek. In such environments, receivers often choose their mate based on individual differences in signal repetition rate. However, signallers also differ in the regularity with which they produce repeated signals. Irregularity in signalling introduces uncertainty in decision-making by masking the among-individual variation in signalling rate that is a target of mate choice. At present, we know little about how the complexity of the choice environment impacts selection on rate and regularity, two signalling behaviours that receivers can only compare after sampling series of signals produced by multiple signallers. In this study of female grey treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis), we measured multivariate sexual selection on the rate and regularity of male calling behaviour using two-, four-, and eight-choice tests. Receivers overwhelmingly chose faster, more regular calling rates in two-choice tests, but did so markedly less often when they chose among four or eight stimuli. Signalling behaviour became much less predictive of signallers’ relative fitness as choice complexity increased, suggesting noise and choice overload effects may shelter male phenotypes from sexual selection imposed by female choice in complex social environments. 

   more » « less