skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Testing a Quaternion Conversion Method to Determine Human Three-Dimensional Tibiofemoral Angles During an In Vitro Simulated Jump Landing
Title: Testing a Quaternion Conversion Method to Determine Human Three-Dimensional Tibiofemoral Angles During an In Vitro Simulated Jump Landing
Abstract Lower limb joint kinematics have been measured in laboratory settings using fixed camera-based motion capture systems; however, recently inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been developed as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to test a quaternion conversion (QC) method for calculating the three orthogonal knee angles during the high velocities associated with a jump landing using commercially available IMUs. Nine cadaveric knee specimens were instrumented with APDM Opal IMUs to measure knee kinematics in one-legged 3–4× bodyweight simulated jump landings, four of which were used in establishing the parameters (training) for the new method and five for validation (testing). We compared the angles obtained from the QC method to those obtained from a commercially available sensor and algorithm (APDM Opal) with those calculated from an active marker motion capture system. Results showed a significant difference between both IMU methods and the motion capture data in the majority of orthogonal angles (p < 0.01), though the differences between the QC method and Certus system in the testing set for flexion and rotation angles were smaller than the APDM Opal algorithm, indicating an improvement. Additionally, in all three directions, both the limits of agreement and root-mean-square error between the QC method and the motion capture system were smaller than between the commercial algorithm and the motion capture.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2003434
PAR ID:
10327078
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Volume:
144
Issue:
4
ISSN:
0148-0731
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, Sensors)
    The ability to accurately measure tibiofemoral angles during various dynamic activities is of clinical interest. The purpose of this study was to determine if inertial measurement units (IMUs) can provide accurate and reliable angle estimates during dynamic actions. A tuned quaternion conversion (TQC) method tuned to dynamics actions was used to calculate Euler angles based on IMU data, and these calculated angles were compared to a motion capture system (our “gold” standard) and a commercially available sensor fusion algorithm. Nine healthy athletes were instrumented with APDM Opal IMUs and asked to perform nine dynamic actions; five participants were used in training the parameters of the TQC method, with the remaining four being used to test validity. Accuracy was based on the root mean square error (RMSE) and reliability was based on the Bland–Altman limits of agreement (LoA). Improvement across all three orthogonal angles was observed as the TQC method was able to more accurately (lower RMSE) and more reliably (smaller LoA) estimate an angle than the commercially available algorithm. No significant difference was observed between the TQC method and the motion capture system in any of the three angles (p < 0.05). It may be feasible to use this method to track tibiofemoral angles with higher accuracy and reliability than the commercially available sensor fusion algorithm. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, Journal of Biomechanics)
    Marker-based motion capture is a fundamental tool in biomechanical analysis, yet comes with major constraints such as time, cost and accessibility. This study aimed to validate the use of OpenCap, a free, markerless motion capture system compared to a marker-based motion capture system to measure lower extremity kinematics during functional tasks. 20 individuals from an athletic population (18 females, 2 males) performed two gait trials (walking, running) and three functional tasks (double leg squat, countermovement jump, jump-landing). Lower extremity peak joint kinematics were collected simultaneously using Vicon and OpenCap to assess the validity of markerless motion capture. Strong agreements were observed in the frontal hip plane joint kinematics across all tasks with root mean squared errors below 6◦. Moderate agreements were observed in the sagittal knee plane joint kinematics (4–10◦) and there was a weak agreement in the gait trials of the sagittal hip measures (>10◦). The results from the study indicate the need for further research on the use of OpenCap in clinical settings. The findings align with previous studies with similar agreements observed in the frontal hip and sagittal knee measures. Validating the use of an open-source motion capture software could provide clinicians and researchers an accessible tool for in depth biomechanical assessments. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering)
    Abstract We compared the ability of seven machine learning algorithms to use wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) data to identify the severe knee loading cycles known to induce microdamage associated with anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Sixteen cadaveric knee specimens, dissected free of skin and muscle, were mounted in a rig simulating standardized jump landings. One IMU was located above and the other below the knee, the applied three-dimensional action and reaction loads were measured via six-axis load cells, and the three-dimensional knee kinematics were also recorded by a laboratory motion capture system. Machine learning algorithms were used to predict the knee moments and the tibial and femur vertical forces; 13 knees were utilized for training each model, while three were used for testing its accuracy (i.e., normalized root-mean-square error) and reliability (Bland–Altman limits of agreement). The results showed the models predicted force and knee moment values with acceptable levels of error and, although several models exhibited some form of bias, acceptable reliability. Further research will be needed to determine whether these types of models can be modified to attenuate the inevitable in vivo soft tissue motion artifact associated with highly dynamic activities like jump landings. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Biomechanics)
    null (Ed.)
    Background: Wearable technology is used by clinicians and researchers and play a critical role in biomechanical assessments and rehabilitation. Objective: The purpose of this research is to validate a soft robotic stretch (SRS) sensor embedded in a compression knee brace (smart knee brace) against a motion capture system focusing on knee joint kinematics. Methods: Sixteen participants donned the smart knee brace and completed three separate tasks: non-weight bearing knee flexion/extension, bodyweight air squats, and gait trials. Adjusted R2 for goodness of fit (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) between the SRS sensor and motion capture kinematic data for all three tasks were assessed. Results: For knee flexion/extension: R2 = 0.799, RMSE = 5.470, MAE = 4.560; for bodyweight air squats: R2 = 0.957, RMSE = 8.127, MAE = 6.870; and for gait trials: R2 = 0.565, RMSE = 9.190, MAE = 7.530 were observed. Conclusions: The smart knee brace demonstrated a higher goodness of fit and accuracy during weight-bearing air squats followed by non-weight bearing knee flexion/extension and a lower goodness of fit and accuracy during gait, which can be attributed to the SRS sensor position and orientation, rather than range of motion achieved in each task. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; (, Journal of Applied Biomechanics)
    Biomechanical behavior prior to landing likely contributes to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries during jump-landing tasks. This study examined prelanding knee kinematics and landing ground reaction forces (GRFs) during single-leg and double-leg landings in males and females. Participants performed landings with the dominant leg or both legs while kinematic and GRF data were collected. Single-leg landings demonstrated less time between prelanding minimal knee flexion and initial ground contact, decreased prelanding and early-landing knee flexion angles and velocities, and increased peak vertical and posterior GRFs compared with double-leg landings. Increased prelanding knee flexion velocities and knee flexion excursion correlated with decreased peak posterior GRFs during both double-leg and single-leg landings. No significant differences were observed between males and females. Prelanding knee kinematics may contribute to the increased risk of ACL injuries in single-leg landings compared with double-leg landings. Future studies are encouraged to incorporate prelanding knee mechanics to understand ACL injury mechanisms and predict future ACL injury risks. Studies of the feasibility of increasing prelanding knee flexion are needed to understand the potential role of prelanding kinematics in decreasing ACL injury risk. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email