Cells are the basic units of all living matter which harness the flow of energy to drive the processes of life. While the biochemical networks involved in energy transduction are well-characterized, the energetic costs and constraints for specific cellular processes remain largely unknown. In particular, what are the energy budgets of cells? What are the constraints and limits energy flows impose on cellular processes? Do cells operate near these limits, and if so how do energetic constraints impact cellular functions? Physics has provided many tools to study nonequilibrium systems and to define physical limits, but applying these tools to cell biology remains a challenge. Physical bioenergetics, which resides at the interface of nonequilibrium physics, energy metabolism, and cell biology, seeks to understand how much energy cells are using, how they partition this energy between different cellular processes, and the associated energetic constraints. Here we review recent advances and discuss open questions and challenges in physical bioenergetics.
Fifteen compelling open questions in plant cell biology
Abstract As scientists, we are at least as excited about the open questions—the things we do not know—as the discoveries. Here, we asked 15 experts to describe the most compelling open questions in plant cell biology. These are their questions: How are organelle identity, domains, and boundaries maintained under the continuous flux of vesicle trafficking and membrane remodeling? Is the plant cortical microtubule cytoskeleton a mechanosensory apparatus? How are the cellular pathways of cell wall synthesis, assembly, modification, and integrity sensing linked in plants? Why do plasmodesmata open and close? Is there retrograde signaling from vacuoles to the nucleus? How do root cells accommodate fungal endosymbionts? What is the role of cell edges in plant morphogenesis? How is the cell division site determined? What are the emergent effects of polyploidy on the biology of the cell, and how are any such “rules” conditioned by cell type? Can mechanical forces trigger new cell fates in plants? How does a single differentiated somatic cell reprogram and gain pluripotency? How does polarity develop de-novo in isolated plant cells? What is the spectrum of cellular functions for membraneless organelles and intrinsically disordered proteins? How do plants deal with internal noise? How does order emerge in cells and propagate to organs and organisms from complex dynamical processes? We hope you find the discussions of these questions thought provoking and inspiring.
more »
« less
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10337456
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Plant Cell
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1040-4651
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 72 to 102
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
-
BACKGROUND Diverse organisms, from archaea and bacteria to plants and humans, use receptor systems to recognize both pathogens and dangerous self-derived or environmentally derived stimuli. These intricate, well-coordinated immune systems, composed of innate and adaptive components, ensure host survival. In the late 20th century, researchers identified the Toll/interleukin-1/resistance gene (TIR) domain as an evolutionarily conserved component of animal and plant innate immune systems. Today, TIR-domain proteins are known to be broadly distributed across the tree of life. The TIR domain was first recognized as an adaptor for the assembly of macromolecular signaling complexes in mammalian innate immune pathways. Work on axon degeneration in animals—as well as on plant, archaeal, and bacterial immune systems—has uncovered additional enzymatic activities for TIR domains. ADVANCES Mammalian axons initiate a self-destruct program upon injury and during disease that is mediated by the sterile alpha and TIR motif containing 1 (SARM1) protein. The SARM1 TIR domain enzymatically consumes the essential metabolic cofactor nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD + ) to promote axonal death. Identification of the SARM1 NAD + -consuming enzyme (NADase) revealed that TIR domains can function as enzymes. Given the evolutionary conservation of TIR domains, studies investigated whether the SARM1 TIR NADase was also conserved. Indeed, bacteria, archaea, and plant TIR domains possess NADase activity. In prokaryotes, TIR NADase activity is found in an ancient antiphage immune system. In plants, identification of TIR NADase activity and linkage of TIR enzymatic products to downstream signaling components addressed the question of how nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) receptors trigger hypersensitive cell death during an immune response. Studies in plants show that their TIR domains can cleave nucleic acids and possess 2′,3′ cyclic adenosine monophosphate (2′,3′-cAMP) and 2′,3′ cyclic guanosine monophosphate (2′,3′-cGMP) synthetase activity that aids cell death programs in plant innate immunity. Thus, TIR domains constitute an ancient family of enzymes that are activated in immune and cell death pathways. OUTLOOK The discovery of TIR-domain enzyme activities carries implications for innate immunity and neurodegeneration. The identification of the SARM1 NADase defined a drug target for a wide number of neurodegenerative diseases that is being exploited in both preclinical and clinical studies. Hyperactive mutations in the SARM1 NADase have been discovered in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. Future work will seek to clarify the contribution of the SARM1 axon degeneration pathway to ALS pathogenesis. NAD + biology influences cellular processes from metabolism to DNA repair to aging. How TIR enzymes influence the NAD + metabolome and its associated pathways in bacteria, archaea, plants, and animals will be an exciting area for upcoming investigation. The discovery of the diversity of TIR enzymatic products is revealing signaling pathways across kingdoms. Discovery of TIR enzymatic function in plants and animals may yet inspire studies of enzymatic functions for Toll-like receptors in animals. We anticipate that cross-kingdom studies of TIR-domain function will guide interventions that will span the tree of life, from treating human neurodegenerative disorders and bacterial infections to preventing plant diseases. Conserved TIR-domain enzymatic activity. TIR-domain proteins from prokaryotes and eukaryotes cleave NAD + into nicotinamide (Nam), ADP-ribose (ADPR), cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR), isomers of cyclic ADP-ribose (2′ or 3′cADPR), and related molecules [e.g., phosphoribosyl adenosine monophosphate (pRib-AMP)]. Plant TIR domains also possess a nuclease activity, can degrade DNA and RNA, and can function as a 2′,3′-cAMP or 2′,3′-cGMP synthetase. TIR enzymatic activity drives cell death and immune pathways across kingdoms. TIR activity can kill cells directly through NAD + depletion or indirectly using enzymatic products as signal molecules. The representative TIR domain structure shown here is Protein Data Bank ID 6O0Q. EDS1, enhanced disease susceptibility 1; ThsA, Thoeris A.more » « less
-
Zooming in on cells reveals patterns on their outer surfaces. These patterns are actually a collection of distinct areas of the cell surface, each containing specific combinations of molecules. The outer layers of pollen grains consist of a cell wall, and a softer cell membrane that sits underneath. As a pollen grain develops, it recruits certain fats and proteins to specific areas of the cell membrane, known as ‘aperture domains’. The composition of these domains blocks the cell wall from forming over them, leading to gaps in the wall called ‘pollen apertures’. Pollen apertures can open and close, aiding reproduction and protecting pollen grains from dehydration. The number, location, and shape of pollen apertures vary between different plant species, but are consistent within the same species. In the plant species Arabidopsis thaliana , pollen normally develops three long and narrow, equally spaced apertures, but it remains unclear how pollen grains control the number and location of aperture domains. Zhou et al. found that mutations in two closely related A. thaliana proteins – ELMOD_A and MCR – alter the number and positions of pollen apertures. When A. thaliana plants were genetically modified so that they would produce different levels of ELMOD_A and MCR, Zhou et al. observed that when more of these proteins were present in a pollen grain, more apertures were generated on the pollen surface. This finding suggests that the levels of these proteins must be tightly regulated to control pollen aperture numbers. Further tests revealed that another related protein, called ELMOD_E, also has a role in domain formation. When artificially produced in developing pollen grains, it interfered with the activity of ELMOD_A and MCR, changing pollen aperture shape, number, and location. Zhou et al. identified a group of proteins that help control the formation of domains in the cell membranes of A. thaliana pollen grains. Further research will be required to determine what exactly these proteins do to promote formation of aperture domains and whether similar proteins control domain development in other organisms.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract We present unresolved questions in plant abiotic stress biology as posed by 15 research groups with expertise spanning eco-physiology to cell and molecular biology. Common themes of these questions include the need to better understand how plants detect water availability, temperature, salinity, and rising carbon dioxide (CO2) levels; how environmental signals interface with endogenous signaling and development (e.g. circadian clock and flowering time); and how this integrated signaling controls downstream responses (e.g. stomatal regulation, proline metabolism, and growth versus defense balance). The plasma membrane comes up frequently as a site of key signaling and transport events (e.g. mechanosensing and lipid-derived signaling, aquaporins). Adaptation to water extremes and rising CO2 affects hydraulic architecture and transpiration, as well as root and shoot growth and morphology, in ways not fully understood. Environmental adaptation involves tradeoffs that limit ecological distribution and crop resilience in the face of changing and increasingly unpredictable environments. Exploration of plant diversity within and among species can help us know which of these tradeoffs represent fundamental limits and which ones can be circumvented by bringing new trait combinations together. Better defining what constitutes beneficial stress resistance in different contexts and making connections between genes and phenotypes, and between laboratory and field observations, are overarching challenges.
-
null (Ed.)ABSTRACT Half a century after Lewis Wolpert's seminal conceptual advance on how cellular fates distribute in space, we provide a brief historical perspective on how the concept of positional information emerged and influenced the field of developmental biology and beyond. We focus on a modern interpretation of this concept in terms of information theory, largely centered on its application to cell specification in the early Drosophila embryo. We argue that a true physical variable (position) is encoded in local concentrations of patterning molecules, that this mapping is stochastic, and that the processes by which positions and corresponding cell fates are determined based on these concentrations need to take such stochasticity into account. With this approach, we shift the focus from biological mechanisms, molecules, genes and pathways to quantitative systems-level questions: where does positional information reside, how it is transformed and accessed during development, and what fundamental limits it is subject to?more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koab225
