skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the NSF-PAR

Title: Separating the NP-Hardness of the Grothendieck Problem from the Little-Grothendieck Problem
Grothendieck’s inequality [Grothendieck, 1953] states that there is an absolute constant K > 1 such that for any n× n matrix A, ‖A‖_{∞→1} := max_{s,t ∈ {± 1}ⁿ}∑_{i,j} A[i,j]⋅s(i)⋅t(j) ≥ 1/K ⋅ max_{u_i,v_j ∈ S^{n-1}}∑_{i,j} A[i,j]⋅⟨u_i,v_j⟩. In addition to having a tremendous impact on Banach space theory, this inequality has found applications in several unrelated fields like quantum information, regularity partitioning, communication complexity, etc. Let K_G (known as Grothendieck’s constant) denote the smallest constant K above. Grothendieck’s inequality implies that a natural semidefinite programming relaxation obtains a constant factor approximation to ‖A‖_{∞ → 1}. The exact value of K_G is yet unknown with the best lower bound (1.67…) being due to Reeds and the best upper bound (1.78…) being due to Braverman, Makarychev, Makarychev and Naor [Braverman et al., 2013]. In contrast, the little Grothendieck inequality states that under the assumption that A is PSD the constant K above can be improved to π/2 and moreover this is tight. The inapproximability of ‖A‖_{∞ → 1} has been studied in several papers culminating in a tight UGC-based hardness result due to Raghavendra and Steurer (remarkably they achieve this without knowing the value of K_G). Briet, Regev and Saket [Briët et al., 2015] proved tight NP-hardness of approximating the little Grothendieck problem within π/2, based on a framework by Guruswami, Raghavendra, Saket and Wu [Guruswami et al., 2016] for bypassing UGC for geometric problems. This also remained the best known NP-hardness for the general Grothendieck problem due to the nature of the Guruswami et al. framework, which utilized a projection operator onto the degree-1 Fourier coefficients of long code encodings, which naturally yielded a PSD matrix A. We show how to extend the above framework to go beyond the degree-1 Fourier coefficients, using the global structure of optimal solutions to the Grothendieck problem. As a result, we obtain a separation between the NP-hardness results for the two problems, obtaining an inapproximability result for the Grothendieck problem, of a factor π/2 + ε₀ for a fixed constant ε₀ > 0.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1900460 1816372
NSF-PAR ID:
10339915
Author(s) / Creator(s):
Editor(s):
Braverman, Mark
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Leibniz international proceedings in informatics
Volume:
215
ISSN:
1868-8969
Page Range / eLocation ID:
22:1--22:17
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ( , STOC'21)
    null (Ed.)
    We investigate the approximability of the following optimization problem. The input is an n× n matrix A=(Aij) with real entries and an origin-symmetric convex body K⊂ ℝn that is given by a membership oracle. The task is to compute (or approximate) the maximum of the quadratic form ∑i=1n∑j=1n Aij xixj=⟨ x,Ax⟩ as x ranges over K. This is a rich and expressive family of optimization problems; for different choices of matrices A and convex bodies K it includes a diverse range of optimization problems like max-cut, Grothendieck/non-commutative Grothendieck inequalities, small set expansion and more. While the literature studied these special cases using case-specific reasoning, here we develop a general methodology for treatment of the approximability and inapproximability aspects of these questions. The underlying geometry of K plays a critical role; we show under commonly used complexity assumptions that polytime constant-approximability necessitates that K has type-2 constant that grows slowly with n. However, we show that even when the type-2 constant is bounded, this problem sometimes exhibits strong hardness of approximation. Thus, even within the realm of type-2 bodies, the approximability landscape is nuanced and subtle. However, the link that we establish between optimization and geometry of Banach spaces allows us to devise a generic algorithmic approach to the above problem. We associate to each convex body a new (higher dimensional) auxiliary set that is not convex, but is approximately convex when K has a bounded type-2 constant. If our auxiliary set has an approximate separation oracle, then we design an approximation algorithm for the original quadratic optimization problem, using an approximate version of the ellipsoid method. Even though our hardness result implies that such an oracle does not exist in general, this new question can be solved in specific cases of interest by implementing a range of classical tools from functional analysis, most notably the deep factorization theory of linear operators. Beyond encompassing the scenarios in the literature for which constant-factor approximation algorithms were found, our generic framework implies that that for convex sets with bounded type-2 constant, constant factor approximability is preserved under the following basic operations: (a) Subspaces, (b) Quotients, (c) Minkowski Sums, (d) Complex Interpolation. This yields a rich family of new examples where constant factor approximations are possible, which were beyond the reach of previous methods. We also show (under commonly used complexity assumptions) that for symmetric norms and unitarily invariant matrix norms the type-2 constant nearly characterizes the approximability of quadratic maximization. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ( , FOCS)
    Establishing the complexity of {\em Bounded Distance Decoding} for Reed-Solomon codes is a fundamental open problem in coding theory, explicitly asked by Guruswami and Vardy (IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2005). The problem is motivated by the large current gap between the regime when it is NP-hard, and the regime when it is efficiently solvable (i.e., the Johnson radius). We show the first NP-hardness results for asymptotically smaller decoding radii than the maximum likelihood decoding radius of Guruswami and Vardy. Specifically, for Reed-Solomon codes of length $N$ and dimension $K=O(N)$, we show that it is NP-hard to decode more than $ N-K- c\frac{\log N}{\log\log N}$ errors (with $c>0$ an absolute constant). Moreover, we show that the problem is NP-hard under quasipolynomial-time reductions for an error amount $> N-K- c\log{N}$ (with $c>0$ an absolute constant). An alternative natural reformulation of the Bounded Distance Decoding problem for Reed-Solomon codes is as a {\em Polynomial Reconstruction} problem. In this view, our results show that it is NP-hard to decide whether there exists a degree $K$ polynomial passing through $K+ c\frac{\log N}{\log\log N}$ points from a given set of points $(a_1, b_1), (a_2, b_2)\ldots, (a_N, b_N)$. Furthermore, it is NP-hard under quasipolynomial-time reductions to decide whether there is a degree $K$ polynomial passing through $K+c\log{N}$ many points. These results follow from the NP-hardness of a generalization of the classical Subset Sum problem to higher moments, called {\em Moments Subset Sum}, which has been a known open problem, and which may be of independent interest. We further reveal a strong connection with the well-studied Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem in Number Theory, which turns out to capture a main barrier in extending our techniques. We believe the Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem deserves further study in the theoretical computer science community. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ( , International Mathematics Research Notices)
    Abstract For $p\geq 1$ and $(g_{ij})_{1\leq i,j\leq n}$ being a matrix of i.i.d. standard Gaussian entries, we study the $n$-limit of the $\ell _p$-Gaussian–Grothendieck problem defined as $$\begin{align*} & \max\Bigl\{\sum_{i,j=1}^n g_{ij}x_ix_j: x\in \mathbb{R}^n,\sum_{i=1}^n |x_i|^p=1\Bigr\}. \end{align*}$$The case $p=2$ corresponds to the top eigenvalue of the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble; when $p=\infty $, the maximum value is essentially the ground state energy of the Sherrington–Kirkpatrick mean-field spin glass model and its limit can be expressed by the famous Parisi formula. In the present work, we focus on the cases $1\leq p<2$ and $2<p<\infty .$ For the former, we compute the limit of the $\ell _p$-Gaussian–Grothendieck problem and investigate the structure of the set of all near optimizers along with stability estimates. In the latter case, we show that this problem admits a Parisi-type variational representation and the corresponding optimizer is weakly delocalized in the sense that its entries vanish uniformly in a polynomial order of $n^{-1}$. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ( , 35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020))
    A systematic study of simultaneous optimization of constraint satisfaction problems was initiated by Bhangale et al. [ICALP, 2015]. The simplest such problem is the simultaneous Max-Cut. Bhangale et al. [SODA, 2018] gave a .878-minimum approximation algorithm for simultaneous Max-Cut which is almost optimal assuming the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC). For single instance Max-Cut, Goemans-Williamson [JACM, 1995] gave an α_GW-approximation algorithm where α_GW ≈ .87856720... which is optimal assuming the UGC. It was left open whether one can achieve an α_GW-minimum approximation algorithm for simultaneous Max-Cut. We answer the question by showing that there exists an absolute constant ε₀ ≥ 10^{-5} such that it is NP-hard to get an (α_GW- ε₀)-minimum approximation for simultaneous Max-Cut assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ( , International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming)
    A classical multi-agent fence patrolling problem asks: What is the maximum length L of a line fence that k agents with maximum speeds v_1,..., v_k can patrol if each point on the line needs to be visited at least once every unit of time. It is easy to see that L = alpha sum_{i=1}^k v_i for some efficiency alpha in [1/2,1). After a series of works [Czyzowicz et al., 2011; Dumitrescu et al., 2014; Kawamura and Kobayashi, 2015; Kawamura and Soejima, 2015] giving better and better efficiencies, it was conjectured by Kawamura and Soejima [Kawamura and Soejima, 2015] that the best possible efficiency approaches 2/3. No upper bounds on the efficiency below 1 were known. We prove the first such upper bounds and tightly bound the optimal efficiency in terms of the minimum speed ratio s = {v_{max}}/{v_{min}} and the number of agents k. Our bounds of alpha <= 1/{1 + 1/s} and alpha <= 1 - 1/(sqrt{k)+1} imply that in order to achieve efficiency 1 - epsilon, at least k >= Omega(epsilon^{-2}) agents with a speed ratio of s >= Omega(epsilon^{-1}) are necessary. Guided by our upper bounds, we construct a scheme whose efficiency approaches 1, disproving the conjecture stated above. Our scheme asymptotically matches our upper bounds in terms of the maximal speed difference and the number of agents used. A variation of the fence patrolling problem considers a circular fence instead and asks for its circumference to be maximized. We consider the unidirectional case of this variation, where all agents are only allowed to move in one direction, say clockwise. At first, a strategy yielding L = max_{r in [k]} r * v_r where v_1 >= v_2 >= ... >= v_k was conjectured to be optimal by Czyzowicz et al. [Czyzowicz et al., 2011] This was proven not to be the case by giving constructions for only specific numbers of agents with marginal improvements of L. We give a general construction that yields L = 1/{33 log_e log_2(k)} sum_{i=1}^k v_i for any set of agents, which in particular for the case 1, 1/2, ..., 1/k diverges as k - > infty, thus resolving a conjecture by Kawamura and Soejima [Kawamura and Soejima, 2015] affirmatively. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email