An official website of the United States government
Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) play an important role in regulating glutamate signal pathways, which are involved in neuropathy and periphery homeostasis. mGluR4, which belongs to Group III mGluRs, is most widely distributed in the periphery among all the mGluRs. It has been proved that the regulation of this receptor is involved in diabetes, colorectal carcinoma and many other diseases. However, the application of structure-based drug design to identify small molecules to regulate the mGluR4 receptor is limited due to the absence of a resolved mGluR4 protein structure. In this work, we first built a homology model of mGluR4 based on a crystal structure of mGluR8, and then conducted hierarchical virtual screening (HVS) to identify possible active ligands for mGluR4. The HVS protocol consists of three hierarchical filters including Glide docking, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation and binding free energy calculation. We successfully prioritized active ligands of mGluR4 from a set of screening compounds using HVS. The predicted active ligands based on binding affinities can almost cover all the experiment-determined active ligands, with only one ligand missed. The correlation between the measured and predicted binding affinities is significantly improved for the MM-PB/GBSA-WSAS methods compared to the Glide docking method. More importantly, we have identified hotspots for ligand binding, and we found that SER157 and GLY158 tend to contribute to the selectivity of mGluR4 ligands, while ALA154 and ALA155 could account for the ligand selectivity to mGluR8. We also recognized other 5 key residues that are critical for ligand potency. The difference of the binding profiles between mGluR4 and mGluR8 can guide us to develop more potent and selective modulators. Moreover, we evaluated the performance of IPSF, a novel type of scoring function trained by a machine learning algorithm on residue–ligand interaction profiles, in guiding drug lead optimization. The cross-validation root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) are much smaller than those by the endpoint methods, and the correlation coefficients are comparable to the best endpoint methods for both mGluRs. Thus, machine learning-based IPSF can be applied to guide lead optimization, albeit the total number of actives/inactives are not big, a typical scenario in drug discovery projects.
more »
« less
Comparative assessment of QM-based and MM-based models for prediction of protein–ligand binding affinity trends
Methods which accurately predict protein – ligand binding strengths are critical for drug discovery. In the last two decades, advances in chemical modelling have enabled steadily accelerating progress in the discovery and optimization of structure-based drug design. Most computational methods currently used in this context are based on molecular mechanics force fields that often have deficiencies in describing the quantum mechanical (QM) aspects of molecular binding. In this study, we show the competitiveness of our QM-based Molecules-in-Molecules (MIM) fragmentation method for characterizing binding energy trends for seven different datasets of protein – ligand complexes. By using molecular fragmentation, the MIM method allows for accelerated QM calculations. We demonstrate that for classes of structurally similar ligands bound to a common receptor, MIM provides excellent correlation to experiment, surpassing the more popular Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM/PBSA) and Molecular Mechanics Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) methods. The MIM method offers a relatively simple, well-defined protocol by which binding trends can be ascertained at the QM level and is suggested as a promising option for lead optimization in structure-based drug design.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2102583
- PAR ID:
- 10341907
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 23
- ISSN:
- 1463-9076
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 14525 to 14537
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Designing protein-binding proteins is critical for drug discovery. However, artificial-intelligence-based design of such proteins is challenging due to the complexity of protein–ligand interactions, the flexibility of ligand molecules and amino acid side chains, and sequence–structure dependencies. We introduce PocketGen, a deep generative model that produces residue sequence and atomic structure of the protein regions in which ligand interactions occur. PocketGen promotes consistency between protein sequence and structure by using a graph transformer for structural encoding and a sequence refinement module based on a protein language model. The graph transformer captures interactions at multiple scales, including atom, residue and ligand levels. For sequence refinement, PocketGen integrates a structural adapter into the protein language model, ensuring that structure-based predictions align with sequence-based predictions. PocketGen can generate high-fidelity protein pockets with enhanced binding affinity and structural validity. It operates ten times faster than physics-based methods and achieves a 97% success rate, defined as the percentage of generated pockets with higher binding affinity than reference pockets. Additionally, it attains an amino acid recovery rate exceeding 63%.more » « less
-
Recently, molecular fingerprints extracted from three-dimensional (3D) structures using advanced mathematics, such as algebraic topology, differential geometry, and graph theory have been paired with efficient machine learning, especially deep learning algorithms to outperform other methods in drug discovery applications and competitions. This raises the question of whether classical 2D fingerprints are still valuable in computer-aided drug discovery. This work considers 23 datasets associated with four typical problems, namely protein–ligand binding, toxicity, solubility and partition coefficient to assess the performance of eight 2D fingerprints. Advanced machine learning algorithms including random forest, gradient boosted decision tree, single-task deep neural network and multitask deep neural network are employed to construct efficient 2D-fingerprint based models. Additionally, appropriate consensus models are built to further enhance the performance of 2D-fingerprint-based methods. It is demonstrated that 2D-fingerprint-based models perform as well as the state-of-the-art 3D structure-based models for the predictions of toxicity, solubility, partition coefficient and protein–ligand binding affinity based on only ligand information. However, 3D structure-based models outperform 2D fingerprint-based methods in complex-based protein–ligand binding affinity predictions.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT Predicting the structure of ligands bound to proteins is a foundational problem in modern biotechnology and drug discovery, yet little is known about how to combine the predictions of protein‐ligand structure (poses) produced by the latest deep learning methods to identify the best poses and how to accurately estimate the binding affinity between a protein target and a list of ligand candidates. Further, a blind benchmarking and assessment of protein‐ligand structure and binding affinity prediction is necessary to ensure it generalizes well to new settings. Towards this end, we introduceMULTICOM_ligand, a deep learning‐based protein‐ligand structure and binding affinity prediction ensemble featuring structural consensus ranking for unsupervised pose ranking and a new deep generative flow matching model for joint structure and binding affinity prediction. Notably,MULTICOM_ligand ranked among the top‐5 ligand prediction methods in both protein‐ligand structure prediction and binding affinity prediction in the 16th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Structure Prediction (CASP16), demonstrating its efficacy and utility for real‐world drug discovery efforts. The source code for MULTICOM_ligand is freely available on GitHub.more » « less
-
Abstract Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD) is a robust computational method for simultaneous unconstrained enhanced sampling and free energy calculations of biomolecules. It works by adding a harmonic boost potential to smooth biomolecular potential energy surface and reduce energy barriers. GaMD greatly accelerates biomolecular simulations by orders of magnitude. Without the need to set predefined reaction coordinates or collective variables, GaMD provides unconstrained enhanced sampling and is advantageous for simulating complex biological processes. The GaMD boost potential exhibits a Gaussian distribution, thereby allowing for energetic reweighting via cumulant expansion to the second order (i.e., “Gaussian approximation”). This leads to accurate reconstruction of free energy landscapes of biomolecules. Hybrid schemes with other enhanced sampling methods, such as the replica‐exchange GaMD (rex‐GaMD) and replica‐exchange umbrella sampling GaMD (GaREUS), have also been introduced, further improving sampling and free energy calculations. Recently, new “selective GaMD” algorithms including the Ligand GaMD (LiGaMD) and Peptide GaMD (Pep‐GaMD) enabled microsecond simulations to capture repetitive dissociation and binding of small‐molecule ligands and highly flexible peptides. The simulations then allowed highly efficient quantitative characterization of the ligand/peptide binding thermodynamics and kinetics. Taken together, GaMD and its innovative variants are applicable to simulate a wide variety of biomolecular dynamics, including protein folding, conformational changes and allostery, ligand binding, peptide binding, protein–protein/nucleic acid/carbohydrate interactions, and carbohydrate/nucleic acid interactions. In this review, we present principles of the GaMD algorithms and recent applications in biomolecular simulations and drug design. This article is categorized under:Structure and Mechanism > Computational Biochemistry and BiophysicsMolecular and Statistical Mechanics > Molecular Dynamics and Monte‐Carlo MethodsMolecular and Statistical Mechanics > Free Energy Methodsmore » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cp00464j
