Abstract Birds morph their wing shape to accomplish extraordinary manoeuvres 1–4 , which are governed by avian-specific equations of motion. Solving these equations requires information about a bird’s aerodynamic and inertial characteristics 5 . Avian flight research to date has focused on resolving aerodynamic features, whereas inertial properties including centre of gravity and moment of inertia are seldom addressed. Here we use an analytical method to determine the inertial characteristics of 22 species across the full range of elbow and wrist flexion and extension. We find that wing morphing allows birds to substantially change their roll and yaw inertia but has a minimal effect on the position of the centre of gravity. With the addition of inertial characteristics, we derived a novel metric of pitch agility and estimated the static pitch stability, revealing that the agility and static margin ranges are reduced as body mass increases. These results provide quantitative evidence that evolution selects for both stable and unstable flight, in contrast to the prevailing narrative that birds are evolving away from stability 6 . This comprehensive analysis of avian inertial characteristics provides the key features required to establish a theoretical model of avian manoeuvrability.
more »
« less
Where is WAIR (and other wing-assisted behaviours)? Essentially everywhere: a response to Kuznetsov and Panyutina (2022)
Abstract Kuznetsov and Panyutina (2022) offer a reanalysis of the kinematic and force plate data previously published by Bundle and Dial (2003). Their intention is to describe instantaneous wing forces during wing-assisted incline running (WAIR), focusing particularly on the upstroke phase. Based on their interpretation of wing forces and muscle function, the authors conclude that ‘WAIR is a very specialized mode of locomotion that is employed by a few specialized birds as an adaptation to a very specific environment and involving highly developed flying features of the locomotor apparatus’, and thus not relevant to the evolution of avian flight. Herein, we respond to the authors’ interpretations, offering an alternative perspective on WAIR and, more generally, on studies exploring the evolution of avian flight.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1945878
- PAR ID:
- 10342228
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- ISSN:
- 0024-4066
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Birds perform astounding aerial maneuvers by actuating their shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints to morph their wing shape. This maneuverability is desirable for similar-sized uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) and can be analyzed through the lens of dynamic flight stability. Quantifying avian dynamic stability is challenging as it is dictated by aerodynamics and inertia, which must both account for birds’ complex and variable morphology. To date, avian dynamic stability across flight conditions remains largely unknown. Here, we fill this gap by quantifying how a gull can use wing morphing to adjust its longitudinal dynamic response. We found that it was necessary to adjust the shoulder angle to achieve trimmed flight and that most trimmed configurations were longitudinally stable except for configurations with high wrist angles. Our results showed that as flight speed increases, the gull could fold or sweep its wings backward to trim. Further, a trimmed gull can use its wing joints to control the frequencies and damping ratios of the longitudinal oscillatory modes. We found a more damped phugoid mode than similar-sized UAVs, possibly reducing speed sensitivity to perturbations, such as gusts. Although most configurations had controllable short-period flying qualities, the heavily damped phugoid mode indicates a sluggish response to control inputs, which may be overcome while maneuvering by morphing into an unstable flight configuration. Our study shows that gulls use their shoulder, wrist, and elbow joints to negotiate trade-offs in stability and control and points the way forward for designing UAVs with avian-like maneuverability.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Birds dynamically adapt to disparate flight behaviours and unpredictable environments by actively manipulating their skeletal joints to change their wing shape. This in-flight adaptability has inspired many unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) wings, which predominately morph within a single geometric plane. By contrast, avian joint-driven wing morphing produces a diverse set of non-planar wing shapes. Here, we investigated if joint-driven wing morphing is desirable for UAVs by quantifying the longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of gull-inspired wing-body configurations. We used a numerical lifting-line algorithm (MachUpX) to determine the aerodynamic loads across the range of motion of the elbow and wrist, which was validated with wind tunnel tests using three-dimensional printed wing-body models. We found that joint-driven wing morphing effectively controls lift, pitching moment and static margin, but other mechanisms are required to trim. Within the range of wing extension capability, specific paths of joint motion (trajectories) permit distinct longitudinal flight control strategies. We identified two unique trajectories that decoupled stability from lift and pitching moment generation. Further, extension along the trajectory inherent to the musculoskeletal linkage system produced the largest changes to the investigated aerodynamic properties. Collectively, our results show that gull-inspired joint-driven wing morphing allows adaptive longitudinal flight control and could promote multifunctional UAV designs.more » « less
-
Flapping flight is a commonly used mechanism of micro aerial vehicles and insects alike. Dragonflies use their four-winged anatomy to navigate the environment, maneuver around obstacles, and perform other essential flight patterns. The flight performance and aerodynamics of intact flapping wings is well known; however, this study aims to clarify how wing damage affects the flight performance. First, high speed videos of the damaged wing flight, a takeoff performed by a dragonfly, is captured, and subsequently digitally reconstructed to create a three-dimensional model. Second, using an immersed-boundary method (IBM) based incompressible Navier-Stokes direct numerical simulation (DNS) solver, we resolve the aerodynamic forces and wake topology of the dragonfly’s damaged wing flapping flight in high detail. We found that spanwise damage doesn’t cause any detriment to the force capabilities of the damaged wing which is due to increased pitch angles of the damaged wing. As a consequence, fliers with spanwise damaged and intact wings may be able to utilize similar strategies to achieve takeoffs. The wake topology of the wing damaged flight is also examined. This work serves as a baseline for studying the effect of wing damage for flapping flight and could provide useful insights to micro-aerial vehicle (MAV) designers as some degree of wing damage may be an inevitable occurrence for winged fliers.more » « less
-
Insects have developed diverse flight actuation mechanisms, including synchronous and asynchronous musculature. Indirect actuation, used by insects with both synchronous and asynchronous musculature, transforms thorax exoskeletal deformation into wing rotation. Though thorax deformation is often attributed exclusively to muscle tension, the inertial and aerodynamic forces generated by the flapping wings may also contribute. In this study, a tethered flight experiment was used to simultaneously measure thorax deformation and the inertial/aerodynamic forces acting on the thorax generated by the flapping wing. Compared to insects with synchronous musculature, insects with asynchronous muscle deformed their thorax 60% less relative to their thorax diameter and their wings generated 2.8 times greater forces relative to their body weight. In a second experiment, dorsalventral thorax stiffness was measured across species. Accounting for weight and size, the asynchronous thorax was on average 3.8 times stiffer than the synchronous thorax in the dorsalventral direction. Differences in thorax stiffness and forces acting at the wing hinge led us to hypothesize about differing roles of series and parallel elasticity in the thoraxes of insects with synchronous and asynchronous musculature. Specifically, wing hinge elasticity may contribute more to wing motion in insects with asynchronous musculature than in those with synchronous musculature.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

