More Like this

1. Learning based spatial power characterization and full-chip power estimation for commercial TPUs

   Lu, J. ; Zhang, J. ; Jin W. ; Sachdeva S. ; Tan S. ( January 2023 , Proc. Asia South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC’23))

   In this work, we propose a novel approach for the real-time estimation of chip-level spatial power maps for commercial Google Coral M.2 TPU chips based on a machine-learning technique for the first time. The new method can enable the development of more robust runtime power and thermal control schemes to take advantage of spatial power information such as hot spots that are otherwise not available. Different from the existing commercial multi-core processors in which real-time performance-related utilization information is available, the TPU from Google does not have such information. To mitigate this problem, we propose to use features that are related to the workloads of running different deep neural networks (DNN) such as the hyperparameters of DNN and TPU resource information generated by the TPU compiler. The new approach involves the offline acquisition of accurate spatial and temporal temperature maps captured from an external infrared thermal imaging camera under nominal working conditions of a chip. To build the dynamic power density map model, we apply generative adversarial networks (GAN) based on the workload-related features. Our study shows that the estimated total powers match the manufacturer's total power measurements extremely well. Experimental results further show that the predictions of power maps are quite accurate, with the RMSE of only 4.98\rm mW/mm^2, or 2.6\% of the full-scale error. The speed of deploying the proposed approach on an Intel Core i7-10710U is as fast as 6.9ms, which is suitable for real-time estimation. 

   more » « less
2. Learning to Design Accurate Deep Learning Accelerators with Inaccurate Multipliers

   https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE54114.2022.9774607  

   Jain, Paras ; Huda, Safeen ; Maas, Martin ; Gonzalez, Joseph E. ; Stoical, Ion ; Mirhoseini, Azalia ( March 2022 , 2022 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE))

   Approximate computing is a promising way to improve the power efficiency of deep learning. While recent work proposes new arithmetic circuits (adders and multipliers) that consume substantially less power at the cost of computation errors, these approximate circuits decrease the end-to-end accuracy of common models. We present AutoApprox, a framework to automatically generate approximate low-power deep learning accelerators without any accuracy loss. AutoApprox generates a wide range of approximate ASIC accelerators with a TPUv3 systolic-array template. AutoApprox uses a learned router to assign each DNN layer to an approximate systolic array from a bank of arrays with varying approximation levels. By tailoring this routing for a specific neural network architecture, we discover circuit designs without the accuracy penalty from prior methods. Moreover, AutoApprox optimizes for the end-to-end performance, power and area of the the whole chip and PE mapping rather than simply measuring the performance of the arithmetic units in iso-lation. To our knowledge, our work is the first to demonstrate the effectiveness of custom-tailored approximate circuits in delivering significant chip-level energy savings with zero accuracy loss on a large-scale dataset such as ImageNet. AutoApprox synthesizes a novel approximate accelerator based on the TPU that reduces end-to-end power consumption by 3.2% and area by 5.2% at a sub-10nm process with no degradation in ImageNet validation top-1 and top-5 accuracy. 

   more » « less
3. UPTPU: Improving Energy Efficiency of a Tensor Processing Unit through Underutilization Based Power-Gating

   https://doi.org/10.1109/DAC18074.2021.9586224  

   Pandey, Pramesh ; Gundi, Noel Daniel ; Chakraborty, Koushik ; Roy, Sanghamitra ( December 2021 , 2021 58th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC))

   The AI boom is bringing a plethora of domain-specific architectures for Neural Network computations. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), a Deep Neural Network (DNN) accelerator, has replaced the CPUs/GPUs in its data centers, claiming more than 15X rate of inference. However, the unprecedented growth in DNN workloads with the widespread use of AI services projects an increasing energy consumption of TPU based data centers. In this work, we parametrize the extreme hardware underutilization in TPU systolic array and propose UPTPU: an intelligent, dataflow adaptive power-gating paradigm to provide a staggering 3.5X - 6.5X energy efficiency to TPU for different input batch sizes. 

   more » « less
4. The Temple University Digital Pathology Corpus: The Breast Tissue Subset

   https://doi.org/10.1109/SPMB52430.2021.9672275  

   Wevodau, Z. ; Doshna, B. ; Jhala, N. ; Akhtar, I. ; Obeid, I. ; Picone, J. ( December 2021 , Proceedings of the IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB))

   Obeid, I. (Ed.)

   The Neural Engineering Data Consortium (NEDC) is developing the Temple University Digital Pathology Corpus (TUDP), an open source database of high-resolution images from scanned pathology samples [1], as part of its National Science Foundation-funded Major Research Instrumentation grant titled “MRI: High Performance Digital Pathology Using Big Data and Machine Learning” [2]. The long-term goal of this project is to release one million images. We have currently scanned over 100,000 images and are in the process of annotating breast tissue data for our first official corpus release, v1.0.0. This release contains 3,505 annotated images of breast tissue including 74 patients with cancerous diagnoses (out of a total of 296 patients). In this poster, we will present an analysis of this corpus and discuss the challenges we have faced in efficiently producing high quality annotations of breast tissue. It is well known that state of the art algorithms in machine learning require vast amounts of data. Fields such as speech recognition [3], image recognition [4] and text processing [5] are able to deliver impressive performance with complex deep learning models because they have developed large corpora to support training of extremely high-dimensional models (e.g., billions of parameters). Other fields that do not have access to such data resources must rely on techniques in which existing models can be adapted to new datasets [6]. A preliminary version of this breast corpus release was tested in a pilot study using a baseline machine learning system, ResNet18 [7], that leverages several open-source Python tools. The pilot corpus was divided into three sets: train, development, and evaluation. Portions of these slides were manually annotated [1] using the nine labels in Table 1 [8] to identify five to ten examples of pathological features on each slide. Not every pathological feature is annotated, meaning excluded areas can include focuses particular to these labels that are not used for training. A summary of the number of patches within each label is given in Table 2. To maintain a balanced training set, 1,000 patches of each label were used to train the machine learning model. Throughout all sets, only annotated patches were involved in model development. The performance of this model in identifying all the patches in the evaluation set can be seen in the confusion matrix of classification accuracy in Table 3. The highest performing labels were background, 97% correct identification, and artifact, 76% correct identification. A correlation exists between labels with more than 6,000 development patches and accurate performance on the evaluation set. Additionally, these results indicated a need to further refine the annotation of invasive ductal carcinoma (“indc”), inflammation (“infl”), nonneoplastic features (“nneo”), normal (“norm”) and suspicious (“susp”). This pilot experiment motivated changes to the corpus that will be discussed in detail in this poster presentation. To increase the accuracy of the machine learning model, we modified how we addressed underperforming labels. One common source of error arose with how non-background labels were converted into patches. Large areas of background within other labels were isolated within a patch resulting in connective tissue misrepresenting a non-background label. In response, the annotation overlay margins were revised to exclude benign connective tissue in non-background labels. Corresponding patient reports and supporting immunohistochemical stains further guided annotation reviews. The microscopic diagnoses given by the primary pathologist in these reports detail the pathological findings within each tissue site, but not within each specific slide. The microscopic diagnoses informed revisions specifically targeting annotated regions classified as cancerous, ensuring that the labels “indc” and “dcis” were used only in situations where a micropathologist diagnosed it as such. Further differentiation of cancerous and precancerous labels, as well as the location of their focus on a slide, could be accomplished with supplemental immunohistochemically (IHC) stained slides. When distinguishing whether a focus is a nonneoplastic feature versus a cancerous growth, pathologists employ antigen targeting stains to the tissue in question to confirm the diagnosis. For example, a nonneoplastic feature of usual ductal hyperplasia will display diffuse staining for cytokeratin 5 (CK5) and no diffuse staining for estrogen receptor (ER), while a cancerous growth of ductal carcinoma in situ will have negative or focally positive staining for CK5 and diffuse staining for ER [9]. Many tissue samples contain cancerous and non-cancerous features with morphological overlaps that cause variability between annotators. The informative fields IHC slides provide could play an integral role in machine model pathology diagnostics. Following the revisions made on all the annotations, a second experiment was run using ResNet18. Compared to the pilot study, an increase of model prediction accuracy was seen for the labels indc, infl, nneo, norm, and null. This increase is correlated with an increase in annotated area and annotation accuracy. Model performance in identifying the suspicious label decreased by 25% due to the decrease of 57% in the total annotated area described by this label. A summary of the model performance is given in Table 4, which shows the new prediction accuracy and the absolute change in error rate compared to Table 3. The breast tissue subset we are developing includes 3,505 annotated breast pathology slides from 296 patients. The average size of a scanned SVS file is 363 MB. The annotations are stored in an XML format. A CSV version of the annotation file is also available which provides a flat, or simple, annotation that is easy for machine learning researchers to access and interface to their systems. Each patient is identified by an anonymized medical reference number. Within each patient’s directory, one or more sessions are identified, also anonymized to the first of the month in which the sample was taken. These sessions are broken into groupings of tissue taken on that date (in this case, breast tissue). A deidentified patient report stored as a flat text file is also available. Within these slides there are a total of 16,971 total annotated regions with an average of 4.84 annotations per slide. Among those annotations, 8,035 are non-cancerous (normal, background, null, and artifact,) 6,222 are carcinogenic signs (inflammation, nonneoplastic and suspicious,) and 2,714 are cancerous labels (ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma in situ.) The individual patients are split up into three sets: train, development, and evaluation. Of the 74 cancerous patients, 20 were allotted for both the development and evaluation sets, while the remain 34 were allotted for train. The remaining 222 patients were split up to preserve the overall distribution of labels within the corpus. This was done in hope of creating control sets for comparable studies. Overall, the development and evaluation sets each have 80 patients, while the training set has 136 patients. In a related component of this project, slides from the Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC) Biosample Repository (https://www.foxchase.org/research/facilities/genetic-research-facilities/biosample-repository -facility) are being digitized in addition to slides provided by Temple University Hospital. This data includes 18 different types of tissue including approximately 38.5% urinary tissue and 16.5% gynecological tissue. These slides and the metadata provided with them are already anonymized and include diagnoses in a spreadsheet with sample and patient ID. We plan to release over 13,000 unannotated slides from the FCCC Corpus simultaneously with v1.0.0 of TUDP. Details of this release will also be discussed in this poster. Few digitally annotated databases of pathology samples like TUDP exist due to the extensive data collection and processing required. The breast corpus subset should be released by November 2021. By December 2021 we should also release the unannotated FCCC data. We are currently annotating urinary tract data as well. We expect to release about 5,600 processed TUH slides in this subset. We have an additional 53,000 unprocessed TUH slides digitized. Corpora of this size will stimulate the development of a new generation of deep learning technology. In clinical settings where resources are limited, an assistive diagnoses model could support pathologists’ workload and even help prioritize suspected cancerous cases. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This material is supported by the National Science Foundation under grants nos. CNS-1726188 and 1925494. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. REFERENCES [1] N. Shawki et al., “The Temple University Digital Pathology Corpus,” in Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology: Emerging Trends in Research and Applications, 1st ed., I. Obeid, I. Selesnick, and J. Picone, Eds. New York City, New York, USA: Springer, 2020, pp. 67 104. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030368432. [2] J. Picone, T. Farkas, I. Obeid, and Y. Persidsky, “MRI: High Performance Digital Pathology Using Big Data and Machine Learning.” Major Research Instrumentation (MRI), Division of Computer and Network Systems, Award No. 1726188, January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021. https://www. isip.piconepress.com/projects/nsf_dpath/. [3] A. Gulati et al., “Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognition,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH), 2020, pp. 5036-5040. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2020-3015. [4] C.-J. Wu et al., “Machine Learning at Facebook: Understanding Inference at the Edge,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), 2019, pp. 331–344. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8675201. [5] I. Caswell and B. Liang, “Recent Advances in Google Translate,” Google AI Blog: The latest from Google Research, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ai.googleblog.com/2020/06/recent-advances-in-google-translate.html. [Accessed: 01-Aug-2021]. [6] V. Khalkhali, N. Shawki, V. Shah, M. Golmohammadi, I. Obeid, and J. Picone, “Low Latency Real-Time Seizure Detection Using Transfer Deep Learning,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB), 2021, pp. 1 7. https://www.isip. piconepress.com/publications/conference_proceedings/2021/ieee_spmb/eeg_transfer_learning/. [7] J. Picone, T. Farkas, I. Obeid, and Y. Persidsky, “MRI: High Performance Digital Pathology Using Big Data and Machine Learning,” Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2020. https://www.isip.piconepress.com/publications/reports/2020/nsf/mri_dpath/. [8] I. Hunt, S. Husain, J. Simons, I. Obeid, and J. Picone, “Recent Advances in the Temple University Digital Pathology Corpus,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB), 2019, pp. 1–4. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9037859. [9] A. P. Martinez, C. Cohen, K. Z. Hanley, and X. (Bill) Li, “Estrogen Receptor and Cytokeratin 5 Are Reliable Markers to Separate Usual Ductal Hyperplasia From Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ,” Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., vol. 140, no. 7, pp. 686–689, Apr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2015-0238-OA. 

   more » « less
5. Dynamic Heterogeneous Voltage Regulation for Systolic Array-Based DNN Accelerators

   https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD50377.2020.00088  

   Chen, Jianhao ; Riad, Joseph ; Sanchez-Sinencio, Edgar ; Li, Peng ( October 2020 , 2020 IEEE 38th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD))

   null (Ed.)

   With the growing performance and wide application of deep neural networks (DNNs), recent years have seen enormous efforts on DNN accelerator hardware design for platforms from mobile devices to data centers. The systolic array has been a popular architectural choice for many proposed DNN accelerators with hundreds to thousands of processing elements (PEs) for parallel computing. Systolic array-based DNN accelerators for datacenter applications have high power consumption and nonuniform workload distribution, which makes power delivery network (PDN) design challenging. Server-class multicore processors have benefited from distributed on-chip voltage regulation and heterogeneous voltage regulation (HVR) for improving energy efficiency while guaranteeing power delivery integrity. This paper presents the first work on HVR-based PDN architecture and control for systolic array-based DNN accelerators. We propose to employ a PDN architecture comprising heterogeneous on-chip and off-chip voltage regulators and multiple power domains. By analyzing patterns of typical DNN workloads via a modeling framework, we propose a DNN workload-aware dynamic PDN control policy to maximize system energy efficiency while ensuring power integrity. We demonstrate significant energy efficiency improvements brought by the proposed PDN architecture, dynamic control, and power gating, which lead to a more than five-fold reduction of leakage energy and PDN energy overhead for systolic array DNN accelerators. 

   more » « less