Interval scheduling is a basic problem in the theory of algorithms and a classical task in combinatorial optimization. We develop a set of techniques for partitioning and grouping jobs based on their starting and ending times, that enable us to view an instance of interval scheduling on many jobs as a union of multiple interval scheduling instances, each containing only a few jobs. Instantiating these techniques in dynamic and local settings of computation leads to several new results. For (1+ε)-approximation of job scheduling of n jobs on a single machine, we develop a fully dynamic algorithm with O((log n)/ε) update and O(log n) query worst-case time. Further, we design a local computation algorithm that uses only O((log N)/ε) queries when all jobs are length at least 1 and have starting/ending times within [0,N]. Our techniques are also applicable in a setting where jobs have rewards/weights. For this case we design a fully dynamic deterministic algorithm whose worst-case update and query time are poly(log n,1/ε). Equivalently, this is the first algorithm that maintains a (1+ε)-approximation of the maximum independent set of a collection of weighted intervals in poly(log n,1/ε) time updates/queries. This is an exponential improvement in 1/ε over the running time of a randomized algorithm of Henzinger, Neumann, and Wiese [SoCG, 2020], while also removing all dependence on the values of the jobs' starting/ending times and rewards, as well as removing the need for any randomness. We also extend our approaches for interval scheduling on a single machine to examine the setting with M machines.
more »
« less
Scheduling Parallel-Task Jobs Subject to Packing and Placement Constraints
Motivated by modern parallel computing applications, we consider the problem of scheduling parallel-task jobs with heterogeneous resource requirements in a cluster of machines. Each job consists of a set of tasks that can be processed in parallel; however, the job is considered completed only when all its tasks finish their processing, which we refer to as the synchronization constraint. Furthermore, assignment of tasks to machines is subject to placement constraints, that is, each task can be processed only on a subset of machines, and processing times can also be machine dependent. Once a task is scheduled on a machine, it requires a certain amount of resource from that machine for the duration of its processing. A machine can process (pack) multiple tasks at the same time; however, the cumulative resource requirement of the tasks should not exceed the machine’s capacity. Our objective is to minimize the weighted average of the jobs’ completion times. The problem, subject to synchronization, packing, and placement constraints, is NP-hard, and prior theoretical results only concern much simpler models. For the case that migration of tasks among the placement-feasible machines is allowed, we propose a preemptive algorithm with an approximation ratio of [Formula: see text]. In the special case that only one machine can process each task, we design an algorithm with an improved approximation ratio of four. Finally, in the case that migrations (and preemptions) are not allowed, we design an algorithm with an approximation ratio of 24. Our algorithms use a combination of linear program relaxation and greedy packing techniques. We present extensive simulation results, using a real traffic trace, that demonstrate that our algorithms yield significant gains over the prior approaches.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1652115
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10348344
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Operations Research
- ISSN:
- 0030-364X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Interval scheduling is a basic problem in the theory of algorithms and a classical task in combinatorial optimization. We develop a set of techniques for partitioning and grouping jobs based on their starting and ending times, that enable us to view an instance of interval scheduling on many jobs as a union of multiple interval scheduling instances, each containing only a few jobs. Instantiating these techniques in dynamic and local settings of computation leads to several new results. For (1+ε)-approximation of job scheduling of n jobs on a single machine, we develop a fully dynamic algorithm with O((log n)/ε) update and O(log n) query worst-case time. Further, we design a local computation algorithm that uses only O((log N)/ε) queries when all jobs are length at least 1 and have starting/ending times within [0,N]. Our techniques are also applicable in a setting where jobs have rewards/weights. For this case we design a fully dynamic deterministic algorithm whose worst-case update and query time are poly(log n,1/ε). Equivalently, this is the first algorithm that maintains a (1+ε)-approximation of the maximum independent set of a collection of weighted intervals in poly(log n,1/ε) time updates/queries. This is an exponential improvement in 1/ε over the running time of a randomized algorithm of Henzinger, Neumann, and Wiese [SoCG, 2020], while also removing all dependence on the values of the jobs' starting/ending times and rewards, as well as removing the need for any randomness. We also extend our approaches for interval scheduling on a single machine to examine the setting with M machines.more » « less
-
We study the max-min fairness of multi-task jobs in distributed computing platforms. We consider a setting where each job consists of a set of parallel tasks that need to be processed on different servers, and the job is completed once all its tasks finish processing. Each job is associated with a utility which is a decreasing function of its completion time, and captures how sensitive it is to latency. The objective is to schedule tasks in a way that achieves max-min fairness for jobs' utilities, i.e., an optimal schedule in which any attempt to improve the utility of a job necessarily results in hurting the utility of some other job with smaller or equal utility. We first show a strong result regarding NP-hardness of finding the max-min fair vector of job utilities. The implication of this result is that achieving max-min fairness in many other distributed scheduling problems (e.g., coflow scheduling) is NP-hard. We then proceed to define two notions of approximation solutions: one based on finding a certain number of elements of the max-min fair vector, and the other based on a single-objective optimization whose solution gives the max-min fair vector. We develop scheduling algorithms that provide guarantees under these approximation notions, using dynamic programming and random perturbation of tasks' processing times. We verify the performance of our algorithms through extensive simulations, using a real traffic trace from a large Google cluster.more » « less
-
We study the max-min fairness of multi-task jobs in distributed computing platforms. We consider a setting where each job consists of a set of parallel tasks that need to be processed on different servers, and the job is completed once all its tasks finish processing. Each job is associated with a utility which is a decreasing function of its completion time, and captures how sensitive it is to latency. The objective is to schedule tasks in a way that achieves max-min fairness for jobs’ utilities, i.e., an optimal schedule in which any attempt to improve the utility of a job necessarily results in hurting the utility of some other job with smaller or equal utility.We first show a strong result regarding NP-hardness of finding the max-min fair vector of job utilities. The implication of this result is that achieving max-min fairness in many other distributed scheduling problems (e.g., coflow scheduling) is NP-hard. We then proceed to define two notions of approximation solutions: one based on finding a certain number of elements of the max-min fair vector, and the other based on a single-objective optimization whose solution gives the max-min fair vector. We develop scheduling algorithms that provide guarantees under these approximation notions, using dynamic programming and random perturbation of tasks’ processing times. We verify the performance of our algorithms through extensive simulations, using a real traffic trace from a large Google cluster.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)We consider the problem of makespan minimization on unrelated machines when job sizes are stochastic. The goal is to find a fixed assignment of jobs to machines, to minimize the expected value of the maximum load over all the machines. For the identical-machines special case when the size of a job is the same across all machines, a constant-factor approximation algorithm has long been known. Our main result is the first constant-factor approximation algorithm for the general case of unrelated machines. This is achieved by (i) formulating a lower bound using an exponential-size linear program that is efficiently computable and (ii) rounding this linear program while satisfying only a specific subset of the constraints that still suffice to bound the expected makespan. We also consider two generalizations. The first is the budgeted makespan minimization problem, where the goal is to minimize the expected makespan subject to scheduling a target number (or reward) of jobs. We extend our main result to obtain a constant-factor approximation algorithm for this problem. The second problem involves q-norm objectives, where we want to minimize the expected q-norm of the machine loads. Here we give an [Formula: see text]-approximation algorithm, which is a constant-factor approximation for any fixed q.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2198
