skip to main content

Title: Supporting Information for Provenance Shifts During Neogene Brahmaputra Delta Progradation Tied to Coupled Climate, Tectonic, and Watershed Change in the Eastern Himalaya submitted to Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Abstract
<p>This supplemental text (pp. 2-4) describes the analytical procedures for the detrital zircon fission track (dzFT) and detrital zircon U-Pb analyses (dzUPb). Sample locations are listed in supplemental fileMore>>
Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher:
figshare
Publication Year:
NSF-PAR ID:
10353349
Subject(s):
40301 Basin Analysis Geology 40303 Geochronology 40313 Tectonics 40310 Sedimentology Paleoclimatology 40311 Stratigraphy (incl. Biostratigraphy and Sequence Stratigraphy) 40607 Surface Processes
Size(s):
8748864 Bytes
Award ID(s):
1713893
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology is one of the most common methods used to constrain the provenance of ancient sedimentary systems. Yet, its efficacy for precisely constraining paleogeographic reconstructions is often complicated by geological, analytical, and statistical uncertainties. To test the utility of this technique for reconstructing complex, margin-parallel terrane displacements, we compiled new and previously published U-Pb detrital zircon data (n = 7924; 70 samples) from Neoproterozoic–Cambrian marine sandstone-bearing units across the Porcupine shear zone of northern Yukon and Alaska, which separates the North Slope subterrane of Arctic Alaska from northwestern Laurentia (Yukon block). Contrasting tectonic models for the North Slope subterrane indicate it originated either near its current position as an autochthonous continuation of the Yukon block or from a position adjacent to the northeastern Laurentian margin prior to >1000 km of Paleozoic–Mesozoic translation. Our statistical results demonstrate that zircon U-Pb age distributions from the North Slope subterrane are consistently distinct from the Yukon block, thereby supporting a model of continent-scale strike-slip displacement along the Arctic margin of North America. Further examination of this dataset highlights important pitfalls associated with common methodological approaches using small sample sizes and reveals challenges in relying solely on detrital zircon age spectramore »for testing models of terranes displaced along the same continental margin from which they originated. Nevertheless, large-n detrital zircon datasets interpreted within a robust geologic framework can be effective for evaluating translation across complex tectonic boundaries.« less
  2. Abstract. The Global Ocean Data Analysis Project (GLODAP) is asynthesis effort providing regular compilations of surface-to-bottom oceanbiogeochemical data, with an emphasis on seawater inorganic carbon chemistryand related variables determined through chemical analysis of seawatersamples. GLODAPv2.2020 is an update of the previous version, GLODAPv2.2019.The major changes are data from 106 new cruises added, extension of timecoverage to 2019, and the inclusion of available (also for historicalcruises) discrete fugacity of CO2 (fCO2) values in the mergedproduct files. GLODAPv2.2020 now includes measurements from more than 1.2 million water samples from the global oceans collected on 946 cruises. Thedata for the 12 GLODAP core variables (salinity, oxygen, nitrate, silicate,phosphate, dissolved inorganic carbon, total alkalinity, pH, CFC-11, CFC-12,CFC-113, and CCl4) have undergone extensive quality control with afocus on systematic evaluation of bias. The data are available in twoformats: (i) as submitted by the data originator but updated to WOCEexchange format and (ii) as a merged data product with adjustments appliedto minimize bias. These adjustments were derived by comparing the data fromthe 106 new cruises with the data from the 840 quality-controlled cruises ofthe GLODAPv2.2019 data product using crossover analysis. Comparisons toempirical algorithm estimates provided additional context for adjustmentdecisions; this is new to this version. The adjustments are intendedmore »toremove potential biases from errors related to measurement, calibration, anddata-handling practices without removing known or likely time trends orvariations in the variables evaluated. The compiled and adjusted dataproduct is believed to be consistent to better than 0.005 in salinity, 1 % in oxygen, 2 % in nitrate, 2 % in silicate, 2 % in phosphate,4 µmol kg−1 in dissolved inorganic carbon, 4 µmol kg−1in total alkalinity, 0.01–0.02 in pH (depending on region), and 5 % inthe halogenated transient tracers. The other variables included in thecompilation, such as isotopic tracers and discrete fCO2, were notsubjected to bias comparison or adjustments. The original data and their documentation and DOI codes are available at theOcean Carbon Data System of NOAA NCEI(https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/ocads/oceans/GLODAPv2_2020/, lastaccess: 20 June 2020). This site also provides access to the merged dataproduct, which is provided as a single global file and as four regional ones– the Arctic, Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific oceans –under https://doi.org/10.25921/2c8h-sa89 (Olsen et al., 2020). Thesebias-adjusted product files also include significant ancillary andapproximated data. These were obtained by interpolation of, or calculationfrom, measured data. This living data update documents the GLODAPv2.2020methods and provides a broad overview of the secondary quality controlprocedures and results.« less
  3. Abstract. The Global Ocean Data Analysis Project (GLODAP) is asynthesis effort providing regular compilations of surface to bottom oceanbiogeochemical data, with an emphasis on seawater inorganic carbon chemistryand related variables determined through chemical analysis of water samples.This update of GLODAPv2, v2.2019, adds data from 116 cruises to the previousversion, extending its coverage in time from 2013 to 2017, while also addingsome data from prior years. GLODAPv2.2019 includes measurements from morethan 1.1 million water samples from the global oceans collected on 840cruises. The data for the 12 GLODAP core variables (salinity, oxygen,nitrate, silicate, phosphate, dissolved inorganic carbon, total alkalinity,pH, CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, and CCl4) have undergone extensive qualitycontrol, especially systematic evaluation of bias. The data are available intwo formats: (i) as submitted by the data originator but updated to WOCEexchange format and (ii) as a merged data product with adjustments appliedto minimize bias. These adjustments were derived by comparing the data fromthe 116 new cruises with the data from the 724 quality-controlled cruises ofthe GLODAPv2 data product. They correct for errors related to measurement,calibration, and data handling practices, taking into account any known orlikely time trends or variations. The compiled and adjusted data product isbelieved to be consistent to better than 0.005 inmore »salinity, 1 % in oxygen,2 % in nitrate, 2 % in silicate, 2 % in phosphate, 4 µmol kg−1 in dissolved inorganic carbon, 4 µmol kg−1 in totalalkalinity, 0.01–0.02 in pH, and 5 % in the halogenated transienttracers. The compilation also includes data for several other variables,such as isotopic tracers. These were not subjected to bias comparison oradjustments. The original data, their documentation and DOI codes are available in theOcean Carbon Data System of NOAA NCEI(https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/ocads/oceans/GLODAPv2_2019/, last access: 17 September 2019). Thissite also provides access to the merged data product, which is provided as asingle global file and as four regional ones – the Arctic, Atlantic, Indian,and Pacific oceans – under https://doi.org/10.25921/xnme-wr20(Olsen et al., 2019). Theproduct files also include significant ancillary and approximated data.These were obtained by interpolation of, or calculation from, measured data.This paper documents the GLODAPv2.2019 methods and provides a broad overviewof the secondary quality control procedures and results.« less
  4. Abstract
    <p>Data files were used in support of the research paper titled &#34;“Experimentation Framework for Wireless<br /> Communication Systems under Jamming Scenarios&#34; which has been submitted to the IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory &amp; Applications journal. </p> <p>Authors: Marko Jacovic, Michael J. Liston, Vasil Pano, Geoffrey Mainland, Kapil R. Dandekar<br /> Contact: krd26&#64;drexel.edu</p> <p>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>Top-level directories correspond to the case studies discussed in the paper. Each includes the sub-directories: logs, parsers, rayTracingEmulation, results. </p> <p>--------------------------------</p> <p>logs:    - data logs collected from devices under test<br />     - &#39;defenseInfrastucture&#39; contains console output from a WARP 802.11 reference design network. Filename structure follows &#39;*x*dB_*y*.txt&#39; in which *x* is the reactive jamming power level and *y* is the jaming duration in samples (100k samples &#61; 1 ms). &#39;noJammer.txt&#39; does not include the jammer and is a base-line case. &#39;outMedian.txt&#39; contains the median statistics for log files collected prior to the inclusion of the calculation in the processing script. <br />     - &#39;uavCommunication&#39; contains MGEN logs at each receiver for cases using omni-directional and RALA antennas with a 10 dB constant jammer and without the jammer. Omni-directional folder contains multiple repeated experiments to provide reliable results during each calculation window. RALA directories use s*N* folders in whichMore>>
  5. Abstract
    <p>Data files were used in support of the research paper titled “<em>Mitigating RF Jamming Attacks at the Physical Layer with Machine Learning</em>&#34; which has been submitted to the IET Communications journal.</p> <p>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>All data was collected using the SDR implementation shown here: https://github.com/mainland/dragonradio/tree/iet-paper. Particularly for antenna state selection, the files developed for this paper are located in &#39;dragonradio/scripts/:&#39;</p> <ul><li>&#39;ModeSelect.py&#39;: class used to defined the antenna state selection algorithm</li><li>&#39;standalone-radio.py&#39;: SDR implementation for normal radio operation with reconfigurable antenna</li><li>&#39;standalone-radio-tuning.py&#39;: SDR implementation for hyperparameter tunning</li><li>&#39;standalone-radio-onmi.py&#39;: SDR implementation for omnidirectional mode only</li></ul> <p>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>Authors: Marko Jacovic, Xaime Rivas Rey, Geoffrey Mainland, Kapil R. Dandekar<br /> Contact: krd26&#64;drexel.edu</p> <p>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>Top-level directories and content will be described below. Detailed descriptions of experiments performed are provided in the paper.</p> <p>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>classifier_training: files used for training classifiers that are integrated into SDR platform</p> <ul><li>&#39;logs-8-18&#39; directory contains OTA SDR collected log files for each jammer type and under normal operation (including congested and weaklink states)</li><li>&#39;classTrain.py&#39; is the main parser for training the classifiers</li><li>&#39;trainedClassifiers&#39; contains the output classifiers generated by &#39;classTrain.py&#39;</li></ul> <p>post_processing_classifier: contains logs of online classifier outputs and processing script</p> <ul><li>&#39;class&#39; directory contains .csv logs of each RTE and OTA experiment for each jamming and operation scenario</li><li>&#39;classProcess.py&#39; parsesMore>>