An official website of the United States government
Abstract Bottom drag is believed to be one of the key mechanisms that remove kinetic energy from the ocean's general circulation. However, large uncertainty still remains in global estimates of bottom drag dissipation. One significant source of uncertainty comes from the velocity structures near the bottom where the combination of sloping topography and stratification can reduce the mean flow magnitude, and thus the bottom drag dissipation. Using high‐resolution numerical simulations, we demonstrate that previous estimates of bottom drag dissipation are biased high because they neglect velocity shear in the bottom boundary layer. The estimated bottom drag dissipation associated with geostrophic flows over the continental slopes is at least 56% smaller compared with prior estimates made using total velocities outside the near‐bottom layer. The diagnostics suggest the necessity of resolving the bottom boundary layer structures in coarse‐resolution ocean models and observations in order to close the global kinetic energy budget.
more »
« less
Note on the Bulk Estimate of the Energy Dissipation Rate in the Oceanic Bottom Boundary Layer
The dissipation of the kinetic energy (KE) associated with oceanic flows is believed to occur primarily in the oceanic bottom boundary layer (BBL), where bottom drag converts the KE from mean flows to heat loss through irreversible mixing at molecular scales. Due to the practical difficulties associated with direct observations on small-scale turbulence close to the seafloor, most up-to-date estimates on bottom drag rely on a simple bulk formula (CdU3) proposed by G.I. Taylor that relates the integrated BBL dissipation rate to a drag coefficient (Cd) as well as a flow magnitude outside of the BBL (U). Using output from several turbulence-resolving direct numerical simulations, it is shown that the true BBL-integrated dissipation rate is approximately 90% of that estimated using the classic bulk formula, applied here to the simplest scenario where a mean flow is present over a flat and hydrodynamically smooth bottom. It is further argued that Taylor’s formula only provides an upper bound estimate and should be applied with caution in the future quantification of BBL dissipation; the performance of the bulk formula depends on the distribution of velocity and shear stress near the bottom, which, in the real ocean, could be disrupted by bottom roughness.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1756324
- PAR ID:
- 10353505
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Fluids
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 2311-5521
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 82
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
In past experiments, simulations and theoretical analysis, rotation has been shown to dramatically effect the characteristics of turbulent flows, such as causing the mean velocity profile to appear laminar, leading to an overall drag reduction, as well as affecting the Reynolds stress tensor. The axially rotating pipe is an exemplary prototypical model problem that exhibits these complex turbulent flow physics. For this flow, the rotation of the pipe causes a region of turbulence suppression which is particularly sensitive to the rotation rate and Reynolds number. The physical mechanisms causing turbulence suppression are currently not well-understood, and a deeper understanding of these mechanisms is of great value for many practical examples involving swirling or rotating flows, such as swirl generators, wing-tip vortices, axial compressors, hurricanes, etc. In this work, Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) of rotating turbulent pipe flows are conducted at moderate Reynolds numbers (Re=5300, 11,700, and 19,000) and rotation numbers of N=0 to 3. The main objectives of this work are to firstly quantify turbulence suppression for rotating turbulent pipe flows at different Reynolds numbers as well as study the effects of rotation on turbulence by analyzing the characteristics of the Reynolds stress tensor and the production and dissipation terms of the turbulence budgets.more » « less
-
Abstract This study examines the utility of Eady-type theories as applied to understanding baroclinic instability in coastal flows where depth variations and bottom drag are important. The focus is on the effects of nongeostrophy, boundary dissipation, and bottom slope. The approach compares theoretically derived instability properties against numerical model calculations, for experiments designed to isolate the individual effects and justified to have Eady-like basic states. For the nongeostrophic effect, the theory of Stone (1966) is shown to give reasonable predictions for the most unstable growth rate and wavelength. It is also shown that the growing instability in a fully nonlinear model can be interpreted as boundary-trapped Rossby wave interactions—that is, wave phase locking and westward phase tilt allow waves to be mutually amplified. The analyses demonstrate that both the boundary dissipative and bottom slope effects can be represented by vertical velocities at the lower boundary of the unstable interior, via inducing Ekman pumping and slope-parallel flow, respectively, as proposed by the theories of Williams and Robinson (1974; referred to as the Eady–Ekman problem) and Blumsack and Gierasch (1972). The vertical velocities, characterized by a friction parameter and a slope ratio, modify the bottom wave and thus the scale selection. However, the theories have inherent quantitative limitations. Eady–Ekman neglects boundary layer responses that limit the increase of bottom stress, thereby overestimating the Ekman pumping and growth rate reduction at large drag. Blumsack and Gierasch’s (1972) model ignores slope-induced horizontal shear in the mean flow that tilts the eddies to favor converting energy back to the mean, thus having limited utility over steep slopes.more » « less
-
Abstract Realistic computational simulations in different oceanic basins reveal prevalent prograde mean flows (in the direction of topographic Rossby wave propagation along isobaths; aka topostrophy) on topographic slopes in the deep ocean, consistent with the barotropic theory of eddy-driven mean flows. Attention is focused on the western Mediterranean Sea with strong currents and steep topography. These prograde mean currents induce an opposing bottom drag stress and thus a turbulent boundary layer mean flow in the downhill direction, evidenced by a near-bottom negative mean vertical velocity. The slope-normal profile of diapycnal buoyancy mixing results in downslope mean advection near the bottom (a tendency to locally increase the mean buoyancy) and upslope buoyancy mixing (a tendency to decrease buoyancy) with associated buoyancy fluxes across the mean isopycnal surfaces (diapycnal downwelling). In the upper part of the boundary layer and nearby interior, the diapycnal turbulent buoyancy flux divergence reverses sign (diapycnal upwelling), with upward Eulerian mean buoyancy advection across isopycnal surfaces. These near-slope tendencies abate with further distance from the boundary. An along-isobath mean momentum balance shows an advective acceleration and a bottom-drag retardation of the prograde flow. The eddy buoyancy advection is significant near the slope, and the associated eddy potential energy conversion is negative, consistent with mean vertical shear flow generation for the eddies. This cross-isobath flow structure differs from previous proposals, and a new one-dimensional model is constructed for a topostrophic, stratified, slope bottom boundary layer. The broader issue of the return pathways of the global thermohaline circulation remains open, but the abyssal slope region is likely to play a dominant role.more » « less
-
Abstract We took field observations on the shallow shoals of South San Francisco Bay to examine how sediment‐induced stratification affects the mean flow and mixing of momentum and sediment throughout the water column. A Vectrino Profiler measured near‐bed velocity and suspended sediment concentration profiles, which we used to calculate profiles of turbulent sediment and momentum fluxes. Additional turbulence statistics were calculated using data from acoustic Doppler velocimeters placed throughout the water column. Results showed that sediment‐induced stratification, which was set up by strong near‐bed wave shear, can reduce the frictional bottom drag felt by the mean flow. Measured turbulence statistics suggest that this drag reduction is caused by stratification suppressing near‐bed turbulent fluxes and reducing turbulent kinetic energy dissipation. Turbulent sediment fluxes, however, were not shown to be limited by sediment‐induced stratification. Finally, we compared our results to a common model parameterization which characterizes stratification through a stability parameter modification to the turbulent eddy viscosity and suggest a new nondimensional parameter that may be better suited to represent stratification when modeling oscillatory boundary layer flows.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7020082
