An official website of the United States government
Autonomous agents in a multi-agent system work with each other to achieve their goals. However, In a partially observable world, current multi-agent systems are often less effective in achieving their goals. This limitation is due to the agents’ lack of reasoning about other agents and their mental states. Another factor is the agents’ inability to share required knowledge with other agents. This paper addresses the limitations by presenting a general approach for autonomous agents to work together in a multi-agent system. In this approach, an agent applies two main concepts: goal reasoning- to determine what goals to pursue and share; Theory of mind-to select an agent(s) for sharing goals and knowledge. We evaluate the performance of our multi-agent system in a Marine Life Survey Domain and compare it to another multi-agent system that randomly selects agent(s) to delegates its goals.
more »
« less
Symmetric Machine Theory of Mind
Theory of mind, the ability to model others’ thoughts and desires, is a cornerstone of human social intelligence. This makes it an important challenge for the machine learning community, but previous works mainly attempt to design agents that model the "mental state" of others as passive observers or in specific predefined roles, such as in speaker-listener scenarios. In contrast, we propose to model machine theory of mind in a more general symmetric scenario. We introduce a multi-agent environment SymmToM where, like in real life, all agents can speak, listen, see other agents, and move freely through the world. Effective strategies to maximize an agent’s reward require it to develop a theory of mind. We show that reinforcement learning agents that model the mental states of others achieve significant performance improvements over agents with no such theory of mind model. Importantly, our best agents still fail to achieve performance comparable to agents with access to the gold-standard mental state of other agents, demonstrating that the modeling of theory of mind in multi-agent scenarios is very much an open challenge.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2141751
- PAR ID:
- 10356960
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning
- Volume:
- 162
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
To achieve human-like common sense about everyday life, machine learning systems must understand and reason about the goals, preferences, and actions of other agents in the environment. By the end of their first year of life, human infants intuitively achieve such common sense, and these cognitive achievements lay the foundation for humans' rich and complex understanding of the mental states of others. Can machines achieve generalizable, commonsense reasoning about other agents like human infants? The Baby Intuitions Benchmark (BIB) challenges machines to predict the plausibility of an agent's behavior based on the underlying causes of its actions. Because BIB's content and paradigm are adopted from developmental cognitive science, BIB allows for direct comparison between human and machine performance. Nevertheless, recently proposed, deep-learning-based agency reasoning models fail to show infant-like reasoning, leaving BIB an open challenge.more » « less
-
In order to understand multimodal interactions between humans or humans and machine, it is minimally necessary to identify the content of the agents’ communicative acts in the dialogue. This can involve either overt linguistic expressions (speech or writing), content-bearing gesture, or the integration of both. But this content must be interpreted relative to a deeper understanding of an agent’s Theory of Mind (one’s mental state, desires, and intentions) in the context of the dialogue as it dynamically unfolds. This, in turn, can require identifying and tracking nonverbal behaviors, such as gaze, body posture, facial expressions, and actions, all of which contribute to understanding how expressions are contextualized in the dialogue, and interpreted relative to the epistemic attitudes of each agent. In this paper, we adopt Generative Lexicon’s approach to event structure to provide a lexical semantics for ontic and epistemic actions as used in Bolander’s interpretation of Dynamic Epistemic Logic, called Lexical Event Modeling (LEM). This allows for the compositional construction of epistemic models of a dialogue state. We demonstrate how veridical and false belief scenarios are treated compositionally within this model.more » « less
-
Effective human-human and human-autonomy teamwork is critical but often challenging to perfect. The challenge is particularly relevant in time-critical domains, such as healthcare and disaster response, where the time pressures can make coordination increasingly difficult to achieve and the consequences of imperfect coordination can be severe. To improve teamwork in these and other domains, we present TIC: an automated intervention approach for improving coordination between team members. Using BTIL, a multi-agent imitation learning algorithm, our approach first learns a generative model of team behavior from past task execution data. Next, it utilizes the learned generative model and team's task objective (shared reward) to algorithmically generate execution-time interventions. We evaluate our approach in synthetic multi-agent teaming scenarios, where team members make decentralized decisions without full observability of the environment. The experiments demonstrate that the automated interventions can successfully improve team performance and shed light on the design of autonomous agents for improving teamwork.more » « less
-
We propose and evaluate a learning-based framework to address multi-agent resource allocation in coupled wireless systems. In particular we consider, multiple agents (e.g., base stations, access points, etc.) that choose amongst a set of resource allocation options towards achieving their own performance objective /requirements, and where the performance observed at each agent is further coupled with the actions chosen by the other agents, e.g., through interference, channel leakage, etc. The challenge is to find the best collective action. To that end we propose a Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) framework wherein the best actions (aka arms) are adaptively learned through online reward feedback. Our focus is on systems which are "weakly-coupled" wherein the best arm of each agent is invariant to others' arm selection the majority of the time - this majority structure enables one to develop light weight efficient algorithms. This structure is commonly found in many wireless settings such as channel selection and power control. We develop a bandit algorithm based on the Track-and-Stop strategy, which shows a logarithmic regret with respect to a genie. Finally through simulation, we exhibit the potential use of our model and algorithm in several wireless application scenarios.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
