We consider the linear third order (in time) PDE known as the SMGTJ-equation, defined on a bounded domain, under the action of either Dirichlet or Neumann boundary control
We consider the derivative
- Award ID(s):
- 1856155
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10357980
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Modern Dynamics
- Volume:
- 18
- Issue:
- 0
- ISSN:
- 1930-5311
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 149
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
. Optimal interior and boundary regularity results were given in [\begin{document}$ g $\end{document} 1 ], after [41 ], when , which, moreover, in the canonical case\begin{document}$ g \in L^2(0, T;L^2(\Gamma)) \equiv L^2(\Sigma) $\end{document} , were expressed by the well-known explicit representation formulae of the wave equation in terms of cosine/sine operators [\begin{document}$ \gamma = 0 $\end{document} 19 ], [17 ], [24 ,Vol Ⅱ]. The interior or boundary regularity theory is however the same, whether or\begin{document}$ \gamma = 0 $\end{document} , since\begin{document}$ 0 \neq \gamma \in L^{\infty}(\Omega) $\end{document} is responsible only for lower order terms. Here we exploit such cosine operator based-explicit representation formulae to provide optimal interior and boundary regularity results with\begin{document}$ \gamma \neq 0 $\end{document} "smoother" than\begin{document}$ g $\end{document} , qualitatively by one unit, two units, etc. in the Dirichlet boundary case. To this end, we invoke the corresponding results for wave equations, as in [\begin{document}$ L^2(\Sigma) $\end{document} 17 ]. Similarly for the Neumann boundary case, by invoking the corresponding results for the wave equation as in [22 ], [23 ], [37 ] for control smoother than , and [\begin{document}$ L^2(0, T;L^2(\Gamma)) $\end{document} 44 ] for control less regular in space than . In addition, we provide optimal interior and boundary regularity results when the SMGTJ equation is subject to interior point control, by invoking the corresponding wave equations results [\begin{document}$ L^2(\Gamma) $\end{document} 42 ], [24 ,Section 9.8.2]. -
We present a proof under a generalization of the Riemann Hypothesis that the class group algorithm of Hafner and McCurley runs in expected time
where\begin{document}$ e^{\left(3/\sqrt{8}+o(1)\right)\sqrt{\log d\log\log d}} $\end{document} is the discriminant of the input imaginary quadratic order. In the original paper, an expected run time of\begin{document}$ -d $\end{document} was proven, and better bounds were conjectured. To achieve a proven result, we rely on a mild modification of the original algorithm, and on recent results on the properties of the Cayley graph of the ideal class group.\begin{document}$ e^{\left(\sqrt{2}+o(1)\right)\sqrt{\log d\log\log d}} $\end{document} -
In this paper, we propose a new class of operator factorization methods to discretize the integral fractional Laplacian
for\begin{document}$ (- \Delta)^\frac{{ \alpha}}{{2}} $\end{document} . One main advantage is that our method can easily increase numerical accuracy by using high-degree Lagrange basis functions, but remain its scheme structure and computer implementation unchanged. Moreover, it results in a symmetric (multilevel) Toeplitz differentiation matrix, enabling efficient computation via the fast Fourier transforms. If constant or linear basis functions are used, our method has an accuracy of\begin{document}$ \alpha \in (0, 2) $\end{document} , while\begin{document}$ {\mathcal O}(h^2) $\end{document} for quadratic basis functions with\begin{document}$ {\mathcal O}(h^4) $\end{document} a small mesh size. This accuracy can be achieved for any\begin{document}$ h $\end{document} and can be further increased if higher-degree basis functions are chosen. Numerical experiments are provided to approximate the fractional Laplacian and solve the fractional Poisson problems. It shows that if the solution of fractional Poisson problem satisfies\begin{document}$ \alpha \in (0, 2) $\end{document} for\begin{document}$ u \in C^{m, l}(\bar{ \Omega}) $\end{document} and\begin{document}$ m \in {\mathbb N} $\end{document} , our method has an accuracy of\begin{document}$ 0 < l < 1 $\end{document} for constant and linear basis functions, while\begin{document}$ {\mathcal O}(h^{\min\{m+l, \, 2\}}) $\end{document} for quadratic basis functions. Additionally, our method can be readily applied to approximate the generalized fractional Laplacians with symmetric kernel function, and numerical study on the tempered fractional Poisson problem demonstrates its efficiency.\begin{document}$ {\mathcal O}(h^{\min\{m+l, \, 4\}}) $\end{document} -
Consider the linear transport equation in 1D under an external confining potential
:\begin{document}$ \Phi $\end{document} \begin{document}$ \begin{equation*} {\partial}_t f + v {\partial}_x f - {\partial}_x \Phi {\partial}_v f = 0. \end{equation*} $\end{document} For
(with\begin{document}$ \Phi = \frac {x^2}2 + \frac { \varepsilon x^4}2 $\end{document} small), we prove phase mixing and quantitative decay estimates for\begin{document}$ \varepsilon >0 $\end{document} , with an inverse polynomial decay rate\begin{document}$ {\partial}_t \varphi : = - \Delta^{-1} \int_{ \mathbb{R}} {\partial}_t f \, \mathrm{d} v $\end{document} . In the proof, we develop a commuting vector field approach, suitably adapted to this setting. We will explain why we hope this is relevant for the nonlinear stability of the zero solution for the Vlasov–Poisson system in\begin{document}$ O({\langle} t{\rangle}^{-2}) $\end{document} D under the external potential\begin{document}$ 1 $\end{document} .\begin{document}$ \Phi $\end{document} -
We address the global existence and uniqueness of solutions for the anisotropically reduced 2D Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations in a periodic domain with initial data
and\begin{document}$ u_{01} \in L^2 $\end{document} for\begin{document}$ u_{02} \in H^{-1 + \eta} $\end{document} .\begin{document}$ \eta > 0 $\end{document}