An official website of the United States government
As interest in programming as a major grows, instructors must accommodate more students in their programming courses. One particularly challenging aspect of this growth is providing quality assistance to students during in-class and out-of-class programming exercises. Prior work proposes using instructor dashboards to help instructors combat these challenges. Further, the introduction of ChatGPT represents an exciting avenue to assist instructors with programming exercises but needs a delivery method for this assistance. We propose a revision of a current instructor dashboard Assistant Dashboard Plus that extends an existing dashboard with two new features: (a) identifying students in difficulty so that instructors can effectively assist them, and (b) providing instructors with pedagogically relevant groupings of students’ exercise solutions with similar implementations so that instructors can provide overlapping code style feedback to students within the same group. For difficulty detection, it uses a state-of-the-art algorithm for which a visualization has not been created. For code clustering, it uses GPT. We present a first-pass implementation of this dashboard
more »
« less
PuzzleMe: Leveraging Peer Assessment for In-Class Programming Exercises
Peer assessment, as a form of collaborative learning, can engage students in active learning and improve their learning gains. However, current teaching platforms and programming environments provide little support to integrate peer assessment for in-class programming exercises. We identified challenges in conducting such exercises and adopting peer assessment through formative interviews with instructors of introductory programming courses. To address these challenges, we introduce PuzzleMe, a tool to help Computer Science instructors to conduct engaging in-class programming exercises. PuzzleMe leverages peer assessment to support a collaboration model where students provide timely feedback on their peers' work. We propose two assessment techniques tailored to in-class programming exercises: live peer testing and live peer code review. Live peer testing can improve students' code robustness by allowing them to create and share lightweight tests with peers. Live peer code review can improve code understanding by intelligently grouping students to maximize meaningful code reviews. A two-week deployment study revealed that PuzzleMe encourages students to write useful test cases, identify code problems, correct misunderstandings, and learn a diverse set of problem-solving approaches from peers.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1915515
- PAR ID:
- 10360850
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- CSCW2
- ISSN:
- 2573-0142
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 24
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Objectives The traditional, instructor-led form of live coding has been extensively studied, with findings showing that this form of live coding imparts similar learning to static-code examples. However, a concern with Traditional Live Coding is that it can turn into a passive learning activity for students as they simply observe the instructor program. Therefore, this study compares Active Live Coding—a form of live coding that leverages in-class coding activities and peer discussion—to Traditional Live Coding on three outcomes: 1) students’ adherence to effective programming processes, 2) students’ performance on exams and in-lecture questions, and 3) students’ lecture experience. Participants Roughly 530 students were enrolled in an advanced, CS1 course taught in Java at a large, public university in North America. The students were primarily first- and second-year undergraduate students with some prior programming experience. The student population was spread across two lecture sections—348 students in the Active Live Coding (ALC) lecture and 185 students in the Traditional Live Coding (TLC) lecture. Study Methods We used a mixed-methods approach to answer our‘ research questions. To compare students’ programming processes, we applied process-oriented metrics related to incremental development and error frequencies. To measure students’ learning outcomes, we compared students’ performance on major course components and used pre- and post-lecture questionnaires to compare students’ learning gain during lectures. Finally, to understand students’ lecture experience, we used a classroom observation protocol to measure and compare students’ behavioral engagement during the two lectures. We also inductively coded open-ended survey questions to understand students’ perceptions of live coding. Findings We did not find a statistically significant effect of ALC on students’ programming processes or learning outcomes. It seems that both ALC and TLC impart similar programming processes and result in similar student learning. However, our findings related to students’ lecture experience shows a persistent engagement effect of ALC, where students’ behavioral engagement peaks andremains elevatedafter the in-class coding activity and peer discussion. Finally, we discuss the unique affordances and drawbacks of the lecture technique as well as students’ perceptions of ALC. Conclusions Despite being motivated by well-established learning theories, Active Live Coding did not result in improved student learning or programming processes. This study is preceded by several prior works that showed that Traditional Live Coding imparts similar student learning and programming skills as static-code examples. Though potential reasons for the lack of observed learning benefits are discussed in this work, multiple future analyses to further investigate Active Live Coding may help the community understand the impacts (or lack thereof) of the instructional technique.more » « less
-
Novice programmers can greatly improve their understanding of challenging programming concepts by studying worked examples that demonstrate the implementation of these concepts. Despite the extensive repositories of effective worked examples created by CS education experts, a key challenge remains: identifying the most relevant worked example for a given programming problem and the specific difficulties a student faces solving the problem. Previous studies have explored similar example recommendation approaches. Our research introduces a novel method by utilizing deep learning code representation models to generate code vectors, capturing both syntactic and semantic similarities among programming examples. Driven by the need to provide relevant and personalized examples to programming students, our approach emphasizes similarity assessment and clustering techniques to identify similar code problems, examples, and challenges. This method aims to deliver more accurate and contextually relevant recommendations based on individual learning needs. Providing tailored support to students in real-time facilitates better problem-solving strategies and enhances students' learning experiences, contributing to the advancement of programming education.more » « less
-
Peer feedback is a central activity for project-based design education. The prevalence of devices carried by students and the emergence of novel peer feedback systems enables the possibility of collecting and sharing feedback immediately between students during class. However, pen and paper is thought to be more familiar, less distracting for students, and easier for instructors to implement and manage. To evaluate the efficacy of in-class digital feedback systems, we conducted a within-subjects study with 73 students during two weeks of a game design course. After short student presentations, while instructors provided verbal feedback, peers provided feedback either on paper or through a device. The study found that both methods yielded comments of similar quality and quantity, but the digital approach provided additional ways for students to participate and required less effort from the instructors. While both methods produced similar behaviors, students held inaccurate perceptions about their behavior with each method. We discuss design implications for technologies to support in-class feedback exchange.more » « less
-
In this paper, we compare the types of teaching feedback that graduate student instructors provide their peers in comparison to more senior faculty at a large research-oriented university. Additionally, we consider the challenges and benefits that graduate student instructors report concerning providing teaching feedback to a peer. Our results reveal that graduate student instructors and faculty contribute distinct perspectives on teacher growth and together can form a strong support system for first-time graduate student instructors. Additionally, while observing a peer does pose real challenges, we found that graduate student instructors develop strategies to overcome these and report more benefits than difficulties.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3479559
