We present the first unquenched latticeQCD calculation of the form factors for the decay
A method for modelling the prompt production of molecular states using the hadronic rescattering framework of the generalpurpose Pythia event generator is introduced. Production cross sections of possible exotic hadronic molecules via hadronic rescattering at the LHC are calculated for the
 Award ID(s):
 2103889
 Publication Date:
 NSFPAR ID:
 10362913
 Journal Name:
 The European Physical Journal A
 Volume:
 58
 Issue:
 1
 ISSN:
 14346001
 Publisher:
 Springer Science + Business Media
 Sponsoring Org:
 National Science Foundation
More Like this

Abstract at nonzero recoil. Our analysis includes 15 MILC ensembles with$$B\rightarrow D^*\ell \nu $$ $B\to {D}^{\ast}\ell \nu $ flavors of asqtad sea quarks, with a strange quark mass close to its physical mass. The lattice spacings range from$$N_f=2+1$$ ${N}_{f}=2+1$ fm down to 0.045 fm, while the ratio between the light and the strangequark masses ranges from 0.05 to 0.4. The valence$$a\approx 0.15$$ $a\approx 0.15$b andc quarks are treated using the Wilsonclover action with the Fermilab interpretation, whereas the light sector employs asqtad staggered fermions. We extrapolate our results to the physical point in the continuum limit using rooted staggered heavylight meson chiral perturbation theory. Then we apply a modelindependent parametrization to extend the form factors to the full kinematic range. With this parametrization we perform a joint latticeQCD/experiment fit using several experimental datasets to determine the CKM matrix element . We obtain$$V_{cb}$$ ${V}_{\mathrm{cb}}$ . The first error is theoretical, the second comes from experiment and the last one includes electromagnetic and electroweak uncertainties, with an overall$$\left V_{cb}\right = (38.40 \pm 0.68_{\text {th}} \pm 0.34_{\text {exp}} \pm 0.18_{\text {EM}})\times 10^{3}$$ $\left({V}_{\mathrm{cb}}\right)=(38.40\pm 0.{68}_{\text{th}}\pm 0.{34}_{\text{exp}}\pm 0.{18}_{\text{EM}})\times {10}^{3}$ , which illustrates the tensions between the experimental data sets, and between theory and experiment. This result is inmore »$$\chi ^2\text {/dof} = 126/84$$ ${\chi}^{2}\text{/dof}=126/84$ 
Abstract The Coulombfree^{1}
S _{0}protonproton (p p ) scattering length relies heavily on numerous and distinct theoretical techniques to remove the Coulomb contribution. Here, it has been determined from the halfofftheenergyshellp p scattering cross section measured at centerofmass energies below 1 MeV using the quasifreep +d →p +p +n reaction. A Bayesian datafitting approach using the expression of the swave nucleonnucleon scattering cross section returned ap p scattering length fm and effective range$${a}_{pp}=18.1{7}_{0.58}^{+0.52}{ }_{stat}\pm 0.0{1}_{syst}$$ ${a}_{pp}=18.1{7}_{0.58}^{+0.52}{\mid}_{stat}\pm 0.0{1}_{syst}$r _{0} = 2.80 ± 0.05_{stat} ± 0.001_{syst}fm. A model based on universality concepts has been developed to interpret this result. It accounts for the shortrange interaction as a whole, nuclear and residual electromagnetic, according to what the swave phaseshiftδ does in the description of lowenergy nucleonnucleon scattering data. We conclude that our parameters are representative of the shortrange physics and propose to assess the charge symmetry breaking of the shortrange interaction instead of just the nuclear interaction. This is consistent with the current understanding that the charge dependence of nuclear forces is due to different masses of updown quarks and their electromagnetic interactions. This achievement suggests that these properties have a lesser than expected impact in the context of the charge symmetry breaking. 
Abstract Let us fix a prime
p and a homogeneous system ofm linear equations for$$a_{j,1}x_1+\dots +a_{j,k}x_k=0$$ ${a}_{j,1}{x}_{1}+\cdots +{a}_{j,k}{x}_{k}=0$ with coefficients$$j=1,\dots ,m$$ $j=1,\cdots ,m$ . Suppose that$$a_{j,i}\in \mathbb {F}_p$$ ${a}_{j,i}\in {F}_{p}$ , that$$k\ge 3m$$ $k\ge 3m$ for$$a_{j,1}+\dots +a_{j,k}=0$$ ${a}_{j,1}+\cdots +{a}_{j,k}=0$ and that every$$j=1,\dots ,m$$ $j=1,\cdots ,m$ minor of the$$m\times m$$ $m\times m$ matrix$$m\times k$$ $m\times k$ is nonsingular. Then we prove that for any (large)$$(a_{j,i})_{j,i}$$ ${\left({a}_{j,i}\right)}_{j,i}$n , any subset of size$$A\subseteq \mathbb {F}_p^n$$ $A\subseteq {F}_{p}^{n}$ contains a solution$$A> C\cdot \Gamma ^n$$ $\leftA\right>C\xb7{\Gamma}^{n}$ to the given system of equations such that the vectors$$(x_1,\dots ,x_k)\in A^k$$ $({x}_{1},\cdots ,{x}_{k})\in {A}^{k}$ are all distinct. Here,$$x_1,\dots ,x_k\in A$$ ${x}_{1},\cdots ,{x}_{k}\in A$C and are constants only depending on$$\Gamma $$ $\Gamma $p ,m andk such that . The crucial point here is the condition for the vectors$$\Gamma $\Gamma <p$
in the solution$$x_1,\dots ,x_k$$ ${x}_{1},\cdots ,{x}_{k}$ to be distinct. If we relax this condition and only demand that$$(x_1,\dots ,x_k)\in A^k$$ $({x}_{1},\cdots ,{x}_{k})\in {A}^{k}$ are not all equal, then the statement would follow easily from Tao’s slice rank polynomial method. However, handling the distinctness condition is much harder, and requires a new approach. While all previous combinatorial applications of the slice rank polynomial method have relied on the slice rank of diagonal tensors, we use a slice rank argument for a nondiagonal tensor in combination with combinatorial and probabilistic arguments.$$x_1,\dots ,x_k$$ ${x}_{1},\cdots ,{x}_{k}$ 
Abstract The production of the
particle in heavyion collisions has been contemplated as an alternative probe of its internal structure. To investigate this conjecture, we perform transport calculations of the$$X(3872)$$ $X\left(3872\right)$ through the fireball formed in nuclear collisions at the LHC. Within a kineticrate equation approach as previously used for charmonia, the formation and dissociation of the$$X(3872)$$ $X\left(3872\right)$ is controlled by two transport parameters,$$X(3872)$$ $X\left(3872\right)$i.e. , its inelastic reaction rate and thermalequilibrium limit in the evolving hot QCD medium. While the equilibrium limit is controlled by the charm production cross section in primordial nucleonnucleon collisions (together with the spectra of charm states in the medium), the structure information is encoded in the reaction rate. We study how different scenarios for the rate affect the centrality dependence and transversemomentum ( ) spectra of the$$p_T$$ ${p}_{T}$ . Larger reaction rates associated with the loosely bound molecule structure imply that it is formed later in the fireball evolution than the tetraquark and thus its final yields are generally smaller by around a factor of two, which is qualitatively different from most coalescence model calculations to date. The$$X(3872)$$ $X\left(3872\right)$ spectra provide further information as the later decoupling time within the molecular scenario leads to harder spectra caused by the blueshift from the expanding fireball.$$p_T$$ ${p}_{T}$ 
QLBT: a linear Boltzmann transport model for heavy quarks in a quarkgluon plasma of quasiparticles
Abstract We develop a new heavy quark transport model, QLBT, to simulate the dynamical propagation of heavy quarks inside the quarkgluon plasma (QGP) created in relativistic heavyion collisions. Our QLBT model is based on the linear Boltzmann transport (LBT) model with the ideal QGP replaced by a collection of quasiparticles to account for the nonperturbative interactions among quarks and gluons of the hot QGP. The thermal masses of quasiparticles are fitted to the equation of state from lattice QCD simulations using the Bayesian statistical analysis method. Combining QLBT with our advanced hybrid fragmentationcoalescence hadronization approach, we calculate the nuclear modification factor
and the elliptic flow$$R_\mathrm {AA}$$ ${R}_{\mathrm{AA}}$ of$$v_2$$ ${v}_{2}$D mesons at the Relativistic HeavyIon Collider and the Large Hadron Collider. By comparing our QLBT calculation to the experimental data on theD meson and$$R_\mathrm {AA}$$ ${R}_{\mathrm{AA}}$ , we extract the heavy quark transport parameter$$v_2$$ ${v}_{2}$ and diffusion coefficient$$\hat{q}$$ $\hat{q}$ in the temperature range of$$D_\mathrm {s}$$ ${D}_{s}$ , and compare them with the lattice QCD results and other phenomenological studies.$$14~T_\mathrm {c}$$ $14\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}{T}_{c}$