An official website of the United States government
Abstract Instrumental variable methods are among the most commonly used causal inference approaches to deal with unmeasured confounders in observational studies. The presence of invalid instruments is the primary concern for practical applications, and a fast-growing area of research is inference for the causal effect with possibly invalid instruments. This paper illustrates that the existing confidence intervals may undercover when the valid and invalid instruments are hard to separate in a data-dependent way. To address this, we construct uniformly valid confidence intervals that are robust to the mistakes in separating valid and invalid instruments. We propose to search for a range of treatment effect values that lead to sufficiently many valid instruments. We further devise a novel sampling method, which, together with searching, leads to a more precise confidence interval. Our proposed searching and sampling confidence intervals are uniformly valid and achieve the parametric length under the finite-sample majority and plurality rules. We apply our proposal to examine the effect of education on earnings. The proposed method is implemented in the R package RobustIV available from CRAN.
more »
« less
Two robust tools for inference about causal effects with invalid instruments
Abstract Instrumental variables have been widely used to estimate the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome. Existing confidence intervals for causal effects based on instrumental variables assume that all of the putative instrumental variables are valid; a valid instrumental variable is a variable that affects the outcome only by affecting the treatment and is not related to unmeasured confounders. However, in practice, some of the putative instrumental variables are likely to be invalid. This paper presents two tools to conduct valid inference and tests in the presence of invalid instruments. First, we propose a simple and general approach to construct confidence intervals based on taking unions of well‐known confidence intervals. Second, we propose a novel test for the null causal effect based on a collider bias. Our two proposals outperform traditional instrumental variable confidence intervals when invalid instruments are present and can also be used as a sensitivity analysis when there is concern that instrumental variables assumptions are violated. The new approach is applied to a Mendelian randomization study on the causal effect of low‐density lipoprotein on globulin levels.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10364696
- Publisher / Repository:
- Oxford University Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Biometrics
- Volume:
- 78
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 0006-341X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 24-34
- Size(s):
- p. 24-34
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We develop an omitted variable bias framework for sensitivity analysis of instrumental variable estimates that naturally handles multiple side effects (violations of the exclusion restriction assumption) and confounders (violations of the ignorability of the instrument assumption) of the instrument, exploits expert knowledge to bound sensitivity parameters and can be easily implemented with standard software. Specifically, we introduce sensitivity statistics for routine reporting, such as (extreme) robustness values for instrumental variables, describing the minimum strength that omitted variables need to have to change the conclusions of a study. Next, we provide visual displays that fully characterize the sensitivity of point estimates and confidence intervals to violations of the standard instrumental variable assumptions. Finally, we offer formal bounds on the worst possible bias under the assumption that the maximum explanatory power of omitted variables is no stronger than a multiple of the explanatory power of observed variables. Conveniently, many pivotal conclusions regarding the sensitivity of the instrumental variable estimate (e.g., tests against the null hypothesis of a zero causal effect) can be reached simply through separate sensitivity analyses of the effect of the instrument on the treatment (the first stage) and the effect of the instrument on the outcome (the reduced form). We apply our methods in a running example that uses proximity to college as an instrumental variable to estimate the returns to schooling.more » « less
-
Summary Instrumental variable methods can identify causal effects even when the treatment and outcome are confounded. We study the problem of imperfect measurements of the binary instrumental variable, treatment and outcome. We first consider nondifferential measurement errors, that is, the mismeasured variable does not depend on other variables given its true value. We show that the measurement error of the instrumental variable does not bias the estimate, that the measurement error of the treatment biases the estimate away from zero, and that the measurement error of the outcome biases the estimate toward zero. Moreover, we derive sharp bounds on the causal effects without additional assumptions. These bounds are informative because they exclude zero. We then consider differential measurement errors, and focus on sensitivity analyses in those settings.more » « less
-
Summary Point processes are probabilistic tools for modelling event data. While there exists a fast-growing literature on the relationships between point processes, how such relationships connect to causal effects remains unexplored. In the presence of unmeasured confounders, parameters from point process models do not necessarily have causal interpretations. We propose an instrumental variable method for causal inference with point process treatment and outcome. We define causal quantities based on potential outcomes and establish nonparametric identification results with a binary instrumental variable. We extend the traditional Wald estimation to deal with point process treatment and outcome, showing that it should be performed after a Fourier transform of the intention-to-treat effects on the treatment and outcome, and thus takes the form of deconvolution. We refer to this approach as generalized Wald estimation and propose an estimation strategy based on well-established deconvolution methods.more » « less
-
Abstract: The regression discontinuity (RD) design is a commonly used non-experimental approach for evaluating policy or program effects. However, this approach heavily relies on the untestable assumption that distribution of confounders or average potential outcomes near or at the cutoff are comparable. When there are multiple cutoffs that create several discontinuities in the treatment assignments, factors that can lead this assumption to the failure at one cutoff may overlap with those at other cutoffs, invalidating the causal effects from each cutoff. In this study, we propose a novel approach for testing the causal hypothesis of no RD treatment effect that can remain valid even when the assumption commonly considered in the RD design does not hold. We propose leveraging variations in multiple available cutoffs and constructing a set of instrumental variables (IVs). We then combine the evidence from multiple IVs with a direct comparison under the local randomization framework. This reinforced design that combines multiple factors from a single data can produce several, nearly independent inferential results that depend on very different assumptions with each other. Our proposed approach can be extended to a fuzzy RD design. We apply our method to evaluate the effect of having access to higher achievement schools on students' academic performances in Romania.more » « less
