skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Flexural Subsidence Around Ross Island, West Antarctica
Abstract Ross Island is located in the southern Victoria Land Basin along the western margin of the West Antarctic Rift System. Episodic volcanism since ca. 4.6 Ma produced a discontinuous sedimentary moat around the island, coeval with regional extension. The moat is a composite of four smaller sub‐basins created during distinct episodes of volcanism. Subsidence within each sub‐basin is modeled as bending of a continuous elastic plate, first considering subsidence that occurred only during the time in which the associated volcano was active, and then considering cumulative subsidence since the onset of volcanism on Ross Island. Models based on strata deposited in each sub‐basin during the time interval in which the respective volcano was active yield flexural rigidities ranging from 6–36 × 1018N‐m, with the lowest values associated with the youngest volcanoes on the south and southwest sides of the island. Models based on the entire stratigraphic interval deposited since the onset of volcanism yield flexural rigidities up to 20 times greater than models that consider only strata deposited within each sub‐basin when the associated volcano was active. Models of the composite basin overestimate the strength of the lithosphere due to inclusion of strata deposited during periods in which regional extension rather than local flexure dominated subsidence. The models indicate that Ross Island is in near flexural isostatic equilibrium with moderately low‐density (3,260 kg m−3) upper mantle, although an additional buoyant load equivalent to a mantle temperature anomaly of up to 200°C is permissible.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1644251
PAR ID:
10367485
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Volume:
23
Issue:
4
ISSN:
1525-2027
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Seismic reflection and borehole data are used to create structure maps of four regional and three local unconformities that constrain the post middle Miocene evolution of the Victoria Land Basin (VLB), which is located in the western Ross Sea within the Late Cretaceous through Quaternary West Antarctic Rift System. Isochore maps of the strata between unconformities show that rifting was mostly amagmatic between 12 to 7.6 Ma, with subsidence controlled by faults bordering the northwest margin of the basin and in a tectonic zone along the southern basin axis known as the Terror Rift. Depocenters surrounding volcanic features in strata younger than 4.3 Ma indicate an increasing influence of flexure due to volcanic loading on the subsidence pattern in the southern VLB after this time. The intervening period, from 7.6 to 4.3 Ma, was a transitional period during which both extensional tectonism and magmatism exerted strong influences on basin morphology. Since 4.3 Ma, a series of flexural subbasins formed successively at different times and positions as the different volcanic centers that built Ross Island erupted. In composite, these subbasins form a flexural moat surrounding Ross Island and smaller volcanic centers immediately to the north. The widths of these basins indicate that the flexural rigidity of the lithosphere ranges from 0.20 × 1019to 12.96 × 1019N‐m (elastic thickness 0.6 to 2.4 km). 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Mantle‐induced dynamic topography (i.e., subsidence and uplift) has been increasingly recognized as an important process in foreland basin development. However, characterizing and distinguishing the effects (i.e., location, extent and magnitude) of dynamic topography in ancient foreland basins remains challenging because the spatio‐temporal footprint of dynamic topography and flexural topography (i.e., generated by topographic loading) can overlap. This study employs 3D flexural backstripping of Upper Cretaceous strata in the central part of the North American Cordilleran foreland basin (CFB) to better quantify the effects of dynamic topography. The extensive stratigraphic database and good age control of the CFB permit the regional application of 3D flexural backstripping in this basin for the first time. Dynamic topography started to influence the development of the CFB during the late Turonian to middle Campanian (90.2–80.2 Ma) and became the dominant subsidence mechanism during the middle to late Campanian (80.2–74.6 Ma). The area influenced by >100 m dynamic subsidence is approximately 400 by 500 km, within which significant (>200 m) dynamic subsidence occurs in an irregular‐shaped (i.e., lunate) subregion. The maximum magnitude of dynamic subsidence is 300 ± 100 m based on the 80.2–74.6 Ma tectonic subsidence maps. With the maximum magnitude of dynamic uplift being constrained to be 200–300 m, the gross amount of dynamic topography in the Late Cretaceous CFB is 500–600 m. Although the location of dynamic subsidence revealed by tectonic subsidence maps is generally consistent with isopach map trends, tectonic subsidence maps developed through 3D flexural backstripping provide more accurate constraints of the areal extent, magnitude and rate of dynamic topography (as well as flexural topography) in the CFB through the Late Cretaceous. This improved understanding of dynamic topography in the CFB is critical for refining current geodynamic models of foreland basins and understanding the surface expression of mantle processes. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    Dynamic topography refers to the vertical deflection (i.e., uplift and subsidence) of the Earth’s surface generated in response to mantle flow. Although dynamic subsidence has been increasingly invoked to explain the subsidence and migration of depocenters in the Late Cretaceous North American Cordilleran foreland basin (CFB), it remains a challenging task to discriminate the effects of dynamic mantle processes from other subsidence mechanisms, and the spatial and temporal scales of dynamic topography is not well known. To unravel the relationship between sedimentary systems, accommodation, and subsidence mechanisms of the CFB through time and space, a high-resolution chronostratigraphic framework was developed for the Upper Cretaceous strata based on a dense data set integrating >600 well logs from multiple basins/regions in Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico, USA. The newly developed stratigraphic framework divides the Upper Cretaceous strata into four chronostratigraphic packages separated by chronostratigraphic surfaces that can be correlated regionally and constrained by ammonite biozones. Regional isopach patterns and shoreline trends constructed for successive time intervals suggest that dynamic subsidence influenced accommodation creation in the CFB starting from ca. 85 Ma, and this wave of subsidence increasingly affected the CFB by ca. 80 Ma as subsidence migrated from the southwest to northeast. During 100−75 Ma, the depocenter migrated from central Utah (dominantly flexural subsidence) to north-central Colorado (dominantly dynamic subsidence). Subsidence within the CFB during 75−66 Ma was controlled by the combined effects of flexural subsidence induced by local Laramide uplifts and dynamic subsidence. Results from this study provide new constraints on the spatio-temporal footprint and migration of large-scale (>400 km × 400 km) dynamic topography at an average rate ranging from ∼120 to 60 km/m.y. in the CFB through the Late Cretaceous. The wavelength and location of dynamic topography (subsidence and uplift) generated in response to the subduction of the conjugate Shatsky Rise highly varied through both space and time, probably depending on the evolution of the oceanic plateau (e.g., changes in its location, subduction angle and depth, and buoyancy). Careful, high-resolution reconstruction of regional stratigraphic frameworks using three-dimensional data sets is critical to constrain the influence of dynamic topography. The highly transitory effects of dynamic topography need to be incorporated into future foreland basin models to better reconstruct and predict the formation of foreland basins that may have formed under the combined influence of upper crustal flexural loading and dynamic subcrustal loading associated with large-scale mantle flows. 
    more » « less
  4. Prior to arrival on site, a decision was made to replace the original primary site (proposed Site CSK-13A) by an alternate site (proposed Site CSK-20A); hence, the latter became Site U1591. This was done to pass through a slightly more complete suite of reflectors in the 800–900 ms two-way traveltime (TWT) interval. Site U1591 is located ~8 km northwest of Christiani Island and ~20 km southwest of Santorini (Figure F1) at 514 meters below sea level (mbsl). It was drilled in three holes (U1591A–U1591C) to a maximum recovery depth of 902.7 meters below seafloor (mbsf) (all depths below seafloor are given using the core depth below seafloor, Method A [CSF-A], scale, except in Operations where the drilling depth below seafloor [DSF] scale is used). Average core recovery was similar in all three holes (U1591A= 66%; U1591B= 43%; U1591C= 58%). The drill site targeted the volcano-sedimentary fill of the Christiana Basin. This basin was believed to have formed by subsidence along an ENE–WSW fault system before the changing tectonic regime activated the current northeast–southwest rift system in which the Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo (CSK) volcanic field lies (Tsampouraki-Kraounaki and Sakellariou, 2018; Preine et al., 2022a, 2022b). Christiana Basin is deeper than the Anhydros and Anafi Basins; its volcano-sedimentary fill potentially recorded the earlier volcanic history of the CSK volcanic field (including the products of Christiana and early Santorini), as well as younger Santorini and possibly Milos Volcano to the west along the Hellenic volcanic arc. The now-extinct Christiana Volcano produced lavas and tuffs of unknown ages (Aarburg and Frechen, 1999). An ignimbrite found on Christiani Island (one of the two small islands of Christiana Volcano), Santorini, and the nonvolcanic island of Anaphi, called the Christiani Ignimbrite, was identified (Keller et al., 2010). Six seismic units were previously recognized in the Christiana Basin (Preine et al., 2022a, 2022b; Figure F2). Site U1591 was chosen to pass through Seismic Units U1–U6, including volcaniclastics from Santorini and Christiana, and to target the top few meters of the prevolcanic basement below Unit U1. We received permission from the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Environmental Protection and Safety Panel to drill to the Alpine basement at this site in an advanced piston corer/extended core barrel/rotary core barrel (APC/XCB/RCB) drilling strategy involving three holes. The aims of Site U1591 were (1) to better date the volcanic activity of Christiana using biostratigraphic and magnetostratigraphic means and determine whether the CSK volcanic field had Pliocene volcanism similar to the Milos Volcano farther west; (2) to relate the Christiana volcanism to subsidence along the ENE–WSW fault sets and to the activation of the northeast–southwest fault sets; and (3) to seek the submarine equivalent of the Christiani Ignimbrite. By using deeper coring (and seismic profiles) to reconstruct the volcanic, sedimentary, and tectonic histories of the Christiana Volcano, and possibly the Milos Volcano, we aimed to complement the Santorini and Kolumbo volcanic records of Sites U1589 and U1592 and therefore access a near-continuous time series of volcanism of the CSK volcanic field since rift inception. Site U1591 addressed scientific Objectives 1–4 and 6 of the Expedition 398 Scientific Prospectus (Druitt et al., 2022). 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract Isla Santa Cruz is a volcanic island located in the central Galápagos Archipelago. The island’s northern and southern flanks are deformed by E–W-trending normal faults not observed on the younger Galápagos shields, and Santa Cruz lacks the large summit calderas that characterize those structures. To construct a chronology of volcanism and deformation on Santa Cruz, we employ40Ar/39Ar geochronology of lavas and3He exposure dating of fault scarps from across the island. The combination of Ar–Ar dating with in situ-produced cosmogenic exposure age data provides a powerful tool to evaluate fault chronologies. The40Ar/39Ar ages indicate that the island has been volcanically active since at least 1.62 ± 0.030 Ma (2SD). Volcanism deposited lavas over the entire island until ~ 200 ka, when it became focused along an E–W-trending summit vent system; all dated lavas < 200 ka were emplaced on the southern flank. Structural observations suggest that the island has experienced two major faulting episodes. Crosscutting relationships of lavas indicate that north flank faults formed after 1.16 ± 0.070 Ma, but likely before 416 ± 36 ka, whereas the faults on the southern flank of the island initiated between 201 ± 37 and 32.6 ± 4.6 ka, based on3He exposure dating of fault surfaces. The data are consistent with a model wherein the northeastern faults are associated with regional extension owing to the young volcano’s location closer to the Galápagos Spreading Center at the time. The second phase of volcanism is contemporaneous with the formation of the southern faults. The expression of this younger, low-volume volcanic phase was likely related to the elongate island morphology established during earlier deformation. The complex feedback between tectonic and volcanic processes responsible for southward spreading along the southern flank likely generated persistent E-W-oriented magmatic intrusions. The formation of the Galápagos Transform Fault and sea-level fluctuations may be the primary causes of eruptive and deformational episodes on Santa Cruz. 
    more » « less