skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Accurate prediction of functional states of cis-regulatory modules reveals common epigenetic rules in humans and mice
Abstract BackgroundPredicting cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) in a genome and their functional states in various cell/tissue types of the organism are two related challenging computational tasks. Most current methods attempt to simultaneously achieve both using data of multiple epigenetic marks in a cell/tissue type. Though conceptually attractive, they suffer high false discovery rates and limited applications. To fill the gaps, we proposed a two-step strategy to first predict a map of CRMs in the genome, and then predict functional states of all the CRMs in various cell/tissue types of the organism. We have recently developed an algorithm for the first step that was able to more accurately and completely predict CRMs in a genome than existing methods by integrating numerous transcription factor ChIP-seq datasets in the organism. Here, we presented machine-learning methods for the second step. ResultsWe showed that functional states in a cell/tissue type of all the CRMs in the genome could be accurately predicted using data of only 1~4 epigenetic marks by a variety of machine-learning classifiers. Our predictions are substantially more accurate than the best achieved so far. Interestingly, a model trained on a cell/tissue type in humans can accurately predict functional states of CRMs in different cell/tissue types of humans as well as of mice, and vice versa. Therefore, epigenetic code that defines functional states of CRMs in various cell/tissue types is universal at least in humans and mice. Moreover, we found that from tens to hundreds of thousands of CRMs were active in a human and mouse cell/tissue type, and up to 99.98% of them were reutilized in different cell/tissue types, while as small as 0.02% of them were unique to a cell/tissue type that might define the cell/tissue type. ConclusionsOur two-step approach can accurately predict functional states in any cell/tissue type of all the CRMs in the genome using data of only 1~4 epigenetic marks. Our approach is also more cost-effective than existing methods that typically use data of more epigenetic marks. Our results suggest common epigenetic rules for defining functional states of CRMs in various cell/tissue types in humans and mice.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1661332
PAR ID:
10373275
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Springer Science + Business Media
Date Published:
Journal Name:
BMC Biology
Volume:
20
Issue:
1
ISSN:
1741-7007
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    Abstract cis-regulatory modules(CRMs) formed by clusters of transcription factor (TF) binding sites (TFBSs) are as important as coding sequences in specifying phenotypes of humans. It is essential to categorize all CRMs and constituent TFBSs in the genome. In contrast to most existing methods that predict CRMs in specific cell types using epigenetic marks, we predict a largely cell type agonistic but more comprehensive map of CRMs and constituent TFBSs in the gnome by integrating all available TF ChIP-seq datasets. Our method is able to partition 77.47% of genome regions covered by available 6092 datasets into a CRM candidate (CRMC) set (56.84%) and a non-CRMC set (43.16%). Intriguingly, the predicted CRMCs are under strong evolutionary constraints, while the non-CRMCs are largely selectively neutral, strongly suggesting that the CRMCs are likely cis-regulatory, while the non-CRMCs are not. Our predicted CRMs are under stronger evolutionary constraints than three state-of-the-art predictions (GeneHancer, EnhancerAtlas and ENCODE phase 3) and substantially outperform them for recalling VISTA enhancers and non-coding ClinVar variants. We estimated that the human genome might encode about 1.47M CRMs and 68M TFBSs, comprising about 55% and 22% of the genome, respectively; for both of which, we predicted 80%. Therefore, the cis-regulatory genome appears to be more prevalent than originally thought. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract MotivationGenome-wide maps of epigenetic modifications are powerful resources for non-coding genome annotation. Maps of multiple epigenetics marks have been integrated into cell or tissue type-specific chromatin state annotations for many cell or tissue types. With the increasing availability of multiple chromatin state maps for biologically similar samples, there is a need for methods that can effectively summarize the information about chromatin state annotations within groups of samples and identify differences across groups of samples at a high resolution. ResultsWe developed CSREP, which takes as input chromatin state annotations for a group of samples. CSREP then probabilistically estimates the state at each genomic position and derives a representative chromatin state map for the group. CSREP uses an ensemble of multi-class logistic regression classifiers that predict the chromatin state assignment of each sample given the state maps from all other samples. The difference in CSREP’s probability assignments for the two groups can be used to identify genomic locations with differential chromatin state assignments. Using groups of chromatin state maps of a diverse set of cell and tissue types, we demonstrate the advantages of using CSREP to summarize chromatin state maps and identify biologically relevant differences between groups at a high resolution. Availability and implementationThe CSREP source code and generated data are available at http://github.com/ernstlab/csrep. Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract BackgroundMouse is probably the most important model organism to study mammal biology and human diseases. A better understanding of the mouse genome will help understand the human genome, biology and diseases. However, despite the recent progress, the characterization of the regulatory sequences in the mouse genome is still far from complete, limiting its use to understand the regulatory sequences in the human genome. ResultsHere, by integrating binding peaks in ~ 9,000 transcription factor (TF) ChIP-seq datasets that cover 79.9% of the mouse mappable genome using an efficient pipeline, we were able to partition these binding peak-covered genome regions into acis-regulatory module (CRM) candidate (CRMC) set and a non-CRMC set. The CRMCs contain 912,197 putative CRMs and 38,554,729 TF binding sites (TFBSs) islands, covering 55.5% and 24.4% of the mappable genome, respectively. The CRMCs tend to be under strong evolutionary constraints, indicating that they are likelycis-regulatory; while the non-CRMCs are largely selectively neutral, indicating that they are unlikelycis-regulatory. Based on evolutionary profiles of the genome positions, we further estimated that 63.8% and 27.4% of the mouse genome might code for CRMs and TFBSs, respectively. ConclusionsValidation using experimental data suggests that at least most of the CRMCs are authentic. Thus, this unprecedentedly comprehensive map of CRMs and TFBSs can be a good resource to guide experimental studies of regulatory genomes in mice and humans. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract PremiseThe selection ofArabidopsisas a model organism played a pivotal role in advancing genomic science. The competing frameworks to select an agricultural‐ or ecological‐based model species were rejected, in favor of building knowledge in a species that would facilitate genome‐enabled research. MethodsHere, we examine the ability of models based onArabidopsisgene expression data to predict tissue identity in other flowering plants. Comparing different machine learning algorithms, models trained and tested onArabidopsisdata achieved near perfect precision and recall values, whereas when tissue identity is predicted across the flowering plants using models trained onArabidopsisdata, precision values range from 0.69 to 0.74 and recall from 0.54 to 0.64. ResultsThe identity of belowground tissue can be predicted more accurately than other tissue types, and the ability to predict tissue identity is not correlated with phylogenetic distance fromArabidopsis.k‐nearest neighbors is the most successful algorithm, suggesting that gene expression signatures, rather than marker genes, are more valuable to create models for tissue and cell type prediction in plants. DiscussionOur data‐driven results highlight that the assertion that knowledge fromArabidopsisis translatable to other plants is not always true. Considering the current landscape of abundant sequencing data, we should reevaluate the scientific emphasis onArabidopsisand prioritize plant diversity. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract BackgroundGenome-wide maps of chromatin marks such as histone modifications and open chromatin sites provide valuable information for annotating the non-coding genome, including identifying regulatory elements. Computational approaches such as ChromHMM have been applied to discover and annotate chromatin states defined by combinatorial and spatial patterns of chromatin marks within the same cell type. An alternative “stacked modeling” approach was previously suggested, where chromatin states are defined jointly from datasets of multiple cell types to produce a single universal genome annotation based on all datasets. Despite its potential benefits for applications that are not specific to one cell type, such an approach was previously applied only for small-scale specialized purposes. Large-scale applications of stacked modeling have previously posed scalability challenges. ResultsUsing a version of ChromHMM enhanced for large-scale applications, we apply the stacked modeling approach to produce a universal chromatin state annotation of the human genome using over 1000 datasets from more than 100 cell types, with the learned model denoted as the full-stack model. The full-stack model states show distinct enrichments for external genomic annotations, which we use in characterizing each state. Compared to per-cell-type annotations, the full-stack annotations directly differentiate constitutive from cell type-specific activity and is more predictive of locations of external genomic annotations. ConclusionsThe full-stack ChromHMM model provides a universal chromatin state annotation of the genome and a unified global view of over 1000 datasets. We expect this to be a useful resource that complements existing per-cell-type annotations for studying the non-coding human genome. 
    more » « less