An official website of the United States government
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems convert speech into text and can be placed into two broad categories: traditional and fully end-to-end. Both types have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial audio examples that sound benign to the human ear but force the ASR to produce malicious transcriptions. Of these attacks, only the "psychoacoustic" attacks can create examples with relatively imperceptible perturbations, as they leverage the knowledge of the human auditory system. Unfortunately, existing psychoacoustic attacks can only be applied against traditional models, and are obsolete against the newer, fully end-to-end ASRs. In this paper, we propose an equalization-based psychoacoustic attack that can exploit both traditional and fully end-to-end ASRs. We successfully demonstrate our attack against real-world ASRs that include DeepSpeech and Wav2Letter. Moreover, we employ a user study to verify that our method creates low audible distortion. Specifically, 80 of the 100 participants voted in favor of all our attack audio samples as less noisier than the existing state-of-the-art attack. Through this, we demonstrate both types of existing ASR pipelines can be exploited with minimum degradation to attack audio quality.
more »
« less
Demystifying Limited Adversarial Transferability in Automatic Speech Recognition Systems
The targeted transferability of adversarial samples enables attackers to exploit black-box models in the real-world. The most popular method to produce these adversarial samples is optimization attacks, which have been shown to achieve a high level of transferability in some domains. However, recent research has demonstrated that these attack samples fail to transfer when applied to Automatic Speech Recognition Systems (ASRs). In this paper, we investigate factors preventing this transferability via exhaustive experimentation. To do so, we perform an ablation study on each stage of the ASR pipeline. We discover and quantify six factors (i.e., input type, MFCC, RNN, output type, and vocabulary and sequence sizes) that impact the targeted transferability of optimization attacks against ASRs. Future research can leverage our findings to build ASRs that are more robust to other transferable attack types (e.g., signal processing attacks), or to modify architectures in other domains to reduce their exposure to targeted transferability of optimization attacks.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1933208
- PAR ID:
- 10374196
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The transferability of adversarial examples is of central importance to transfer-based black-box adversarial attacks. Previous works for generating transferable adversarial examples focus on attacking given pretrained surrogate models while the connections between surrogate models and adversarial trasferability have been overlooked. In this paper, we propose Lipschitz Regularized Surrogate (LRS) for transfer-based black-box attacks, a novel approach that transforms surrogate models towards favorable adversarial transferability. Using such transformed surrogate models, any existing transfer-based black-box attack can run without any change, yet achieving much better performance. Specifically, we impose Lipschitz regularization on the loss landscape of surrogate models to enable a smoother and more controlled optimization process for generating more transferable adversarial examples. In addition, this paper also sheds light on the connection between the inner properties of surrogate models and adversarial transferability, where three factors are identified: smaller local Lipschitz constant, smoother loss landscape, and stronger adversarial robustness. We evaluate our proposed LRS approach by attacking state-of-the-art standard deep neural networks and defense models. The results demonstrate significant improvement on the attack success rates and transferability. Our code is available at https://github.com/TrustAIoT/LRS.more » « less
-
The burgeoning fields of machine learning (ML) and quantum machine learning (QML) have shown remarkable potential in tackling complex problems across various domains. However, their susceptibility to adversarial attacks raises concerns when deploying these systems in security-sensitive applications. In this study, we present a comparative analysis of the vulnerability of ML and QML models, specifically conventional neural networks (NN) and quantum neural networks (QNN), to adversarial attacks using a malware dataset. We utilize a software supply chain attack dataset known as ClaMP and develop two distinct models for QNN and NN, employing Pennylane for quantum implementations and TensorFlow and Keras for traditional implementations. Our methodology involves crafting adversarial samples by introducing random noise to a small portion of the dataset and evaluating the impact on the models’ performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. Based on our observations, both ML and QML models exhibit vulnerability to adversarial attacks. While the QNN’s accuracy decreases more significantly compared to the NN after the attack, it demonstrates better performance in terms of precision and recall, indicating higher resilience in detecting true positives under adversarial conditions. We also find that adversarial samples crafted for one model type can impair the performance of the other, highlighting the need for robust defense mechanisms. Our study serves as a foundation for future research focused on enhancing the security and resilience of ML and QML models, particularly QNN, given its recent advancements. A more extensive range of experiments will be conducted to better understand the performance and robustness of both models in the face of adversarial attacks.more » « less
-
White-box targeted adversarial attacks reveal core vulnerabilities in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), yet two key challenges persist: (i) How many target classes can be attacked simultaneously in a specified order, known as the ordered top-K attack problem (K ≥ 1)? (ii) How to compute the corresponding adversarial perturbations for a given benign image directly in the image space? We address both by showing that ordered top-K perturbations can be learned via iteratively optimizing linear combinations of the right singular vectors of the adversarial Jacobian (i.e., the logit-to-image Jacobian constrained by target ranking). These vectors span an orthogonal, informative subspace in the image domain. We introduce RisingAttacK, a novel Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP)-based method that exploits this structure. We propose a holistic figure-of-merits (FoM) metric combining attack success rates (ASRs) and ℓp-norms (p = 1, 2, ∞). Extensive experiments on ImageNet-1k across six ordered top-K levels (K = 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30) and four models (ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, ViTB, DEiT-B) show RisingAttacK consistently surpasses the state-of-the-art QuadAttacK.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)As deep neural networks (DNNs) achieve extraordi- nary performance in a wide range of tasks, testing their robust- ness under adversarial attacks becomes paramount. Adversarial attacks, also known as adversarial examples, are used to measure the robustness of DNNs and are generated by incorporating imperceptible perturbations into the input data with the intention of altering a DNN’s classification. In prior work in this area, most of the proposed optimization based methods employ gradient descent to find adversarial examples. In this paper, we present an innovative method which generates adversarial examples via convex programming. Our experiment results demonstrate that we can generate adversarial examples with lower distortion and higher transferability than the C&W attack, which is the current state-of-the-art adversarial attack method for DNNs. We achieve 100% attack success rate on both the original undefended models and the adversarially-trained models. Our distortions of the L∞ attack are respectively 31% and 18% lower than the C&W attack for the best case and average case on the CIFAR-10 data set.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
