null
(Ed.)
Abstract— In this Work in Progress Research paper, we
present preliminary results on the analysis of the problems present in
a common engineering textbook. In order to transition students
from novice to expert problem solving, they must have practice
solving problems that are typical of engineering practice, i.e. illstructured
and complex. While it is generally believed that
classroom problems are for the most part closed-ended and not
complex, there is no work in the literature to confirm this belief.
In order to address this gap, we analyzed the types of problems
present in a commonly used statics textbook, using Jonassen’s
well-known typology. Our findings show that almost all of the
problems are algorithmic, with a few rule-based and story
problems. There were no problems with higher levels of illstructuredness,
such as decision-making, diagnosis-solution, or
design problems. Some educators may believe that because statics
is an introductory level class, it is appropriate to only present wellstructured
problems. We argue that it is both possible and
necessary to include ill-structured problems in classes at all levels.
Doing so could potentially support students’ critical transition
from novice to expert problem solvers.
Keywords—problem-solving, statics, ambiguity
more »
« less