More Like this

1. On the hardness of dominant strategy mechanism design

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3519935.3520013  

   Dobzinski, Shahar; Ron, Shiri; Vondrák, Jan (June 2022, STOC 2022: Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing)

   Stefano Leonardi (Ed.)

   We study the communication complexity of dominant strategy implementations of combinatorial auctions. We start with two domains that are generally considered “easy”: multi-unit auctions with decreasing marginal values and combinatorial auctions with gross substitutes valuations. For both domains we have fast algorithms that find the welfare-maximizing allocation with communication complexity that is poly-logarithmic in the input size. This immediately implies that welfare maximization can be achieved in ex-post equilibrium with no significant communication cost, by using VCG payments. In contrast, we show that in both domains the communication complexity of any dominant strategy implementation that achieves the optimal welfare is polynomial in the input size. We then move on to studying the approximation ratios achievable by dominant strategy mechanisms. For multi-unit auctions with decreasing marginal values, we provide a dominant-strategy communication FPTAS. For combinatorial auctions with general valuations, we show that there is no dominant strategy mechanism that achieves an approximation ratio better than m1−є that uses poly(m,n) bits of communication, where m is the number of items and n is the number of bidders. In contrast, a randomized dominant strategy mechanism that achieves an O(√m) approximation with poly(m,n) communication is known. This proves the first gap between computationally efficient deterministic dominant strategy mechanisms and randomized ones. En route, we answer an open question on the communication cost of implementing dominant strategy mechanisms for more than two players, and also solve some open problems in the area of simultaneous combinatorial auctions. 

   more » « less
2. Combinatorial Auctions with Interdependent Valuations: SOS to the Rescue

   https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.1371  

   Eden, Alon; Feldman, Michal; Fiat, Amos; Goldner, Kira; Karlin, Anna R. (May 2023, Mathematics of Operations Research)

   We study combinatorial auctions with interdependent valuations, where each agent i has a private signal s_ithat captures her private information and the valuation function of every agent depends on the entire signal profile, [Formula: see text]. The literature in economics shows that the interdependent model gives rise to strong impossibility results and identifies assumptions under which optimal solutions can be attained. The computer science literature provides approximation results for simple single-parameter settings (mostly single-item auctions or matroid feasibility constraints). Both bodies of literature focus largely on valuations satisfying a technical condition termed single crossing (or variants thereof). We consider the class of submodular over signals (SOS) valuations (without imposing any single crossing-type assumption) and provide the first welfare approximation guarantees for multidimensional combinatorial auctions achieved by universally ex post incentive-compatible, individually rational mechanisms. Our main results are (i) four approximation for any single-parameter downward-closed setting with single-dimensional signals and SOS valuations; (ii) four approximation for any combinatorial auction with multidimensional signals and separable-SOS valuations; and (iii) (k + 3) and (2 log(k) + 4) approximation for any combinatorial auction with single-dimensional signals, with k-sized signal space, for SOS and strong-SOS valuations, respectively. All of our results extend to a parameterized version of SOS, d-approximate SOS, while losing a factor that depends on d. Funding: A. Eden was partially supported by NSF Award IIS-2007887, the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007-2013]/ERC Grant Agreement 337122, by the Israel Science Foundation [Grant 317/17], and by an Amazon research award. M. Feldman received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [Grant Agreement 866132], by the Israel Science Foundation [Grant 317/17], by an Amazon research award, and by the NSF-BSF [Grant 2020788]. The work of K. Goldner was supported partially by NSF awards DMS-1903037 and CNS-2228610 and a Shibulal Family Career Development Professorship. A. R. Karlin was supported by the NSF-CCF [Grant 1813135]. 

   more » « less
3. Robust Auctions for Revenue via Enhanced Competition

   https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1929  

   Roughgarden, Tim; Talgam-Cohen, Inbal; Yan, Qiqi (July 2020, Operations Research)

   Most results in revenue-maximizing mechanism design hinge on “getting the price right”—selling goods to bidders at prices low enough to encourage a sale but high enough to garner nontrivial revenue. This approach is difficult to implement when the seller has little or no a priori information about bidder valuations or when the setting is sufficiently complex, such as matching markets with heterogeneous goods. In this paper, we apply a robust approach to designing auctions for revenue. Instead of relying on prior knowledge regarding bidder valuations, we “let the market do the work” and let prices emerge from competition for scarce goods. We analyze the revenue guarantees of one of the simplest imaginable implementations of this idea: first, we enhance competition in the market by increasing demand (or alternatively, by limiting supply), and second, we run a standard second price (Vickrey) auction. In their renowned work from 1996 , Bulow and Klemperer [Bulow J, Klemperer P (1996) Auctions vs. negotiations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(1):180–194.] apply this method to markets with single goods. As our main result, we give the first application beyond single-parameter settings, proving that, simultaneously for many valuation distributions, this method achieves expected revenue at least as good as the optimal revenue in the original market. Our robust and simple approach provides a handle on the elusive optimal revenue in multiitem matching markets and shows when the use of welfare-maximizing Vickrey auctions is justified, even if revenue is a priority. By establishing quantitative tradeoffs, our work provides guidelines for a seller in choosing among two different revenue-extracting strategies: sophisticated pricing based on market research or advertising to draw additional bidders. 

   more » « less
4. An Algorithm for the Assignment Game Beyond Additive Valuations

   Balkanski, Eric; En, Christopher; Faenza, Yuri (July 2024, 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation)

   The assignment game, introduced by Shapley and Shubik [1971], is a classic model for two-sided matching markets between buyers and sellers. In the original assignment game, it is assumed that payments lead to transferable utility and that buyers have unit-demand valuations for the items being sold. There has since been substantial work studying various extensions of the assignment game. The first main area of extension is to imperfectly transferable utility, which is when frictions, taxes, or fees impede the transfer of money between agents. The second is with more complex valuation functions, in particular gross substitutes valuations, which describe substitutable goods. Multiple efficient algorithms have been proposed for computing a competitive equilibrium, the standard solution concept in assignment games, in each of these two settings. However, these lines of work have been mostly independent, with no algorithmic results combining the two. Our main result is an efficient algorithm for computing competitive equilibria in a setting encompassing both those generalizations. We assume that sellers have multiple copies of each items. A buyer $$i$$'s quasi-linear utility is given by their gross substitute valuation for the bundle $$S$$ of items they are assigned to, minus the sum of the payments $$q_{ij}(p_j)$$ for each item $$j \in S$$, where $$p_j$$ is the price of item $$j$$ and $$q_{ij}$$ is piecewise linear, strictly increasing. Our algorithm combines procedures for matroid intersection problems with augmenting forest techniques from matching theory. We also show that in a mild generalization of our model without quasilinear utilities, computing a competitive equilibrium is NP-hard. 

   more » « less
5. Pricing ordered items

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3519935.3520065  

   Chawla, Shuchi; Rezvan, Rojin; Teng, Yifeng; Tzamos, Christos (June 2022, Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing)

   We study the revenue guarantees and approximability of item pricing. Recent work shows that with n heterogeneous items, item-pricing guarantees an O(logn) approximation to the optimal revenue achievable by any (buy-many) mechanism, even when buyers have arbitrarily combinatorial valuations. However, finding good item prices is challenging – it is known that even under unit-demand valuations, it is NP-hard to find item prices that approximate the revenue of the optimal item pricing better than O(√n). Our work provides a more fine-grained analysis of the revenue guarantees and computational complexity in terms of the number of item “categories” which may be significantly fewer than n. We assume the items are partitioned in k categories so that items within a category are totally-ordered and a buyer’s value for a bundle depends only on the best item contained from every category. We show that item-pricing guarantees an O(logk) approximation to the optimal (buy-many) revenue and provide a PTAS for computing the optimal item-pricing when k is constant. We also provide a matching lower bound showing that the problem is (strongly) NP-hard even when k=1. Our results naturally extend to the case where items are only partially ordered, in which case the revenue guarantees and computational complexity depend on the width of the partial ordering, i.e. the largest set for which no two items are comparable. 

   more » « less