More Like this

1. Enhance indigenous agricultural systems to reduce migration

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0473-1  

   Kline, Keith L.; Ramirez, Luis F.; Sum, Carlos; Lopez-Ridaura, Santiago; Dale, Virginia H. (February 2020, Nature Sustainability)
2. Agricultural and Proto-Agricultural Symbioses in Ants

   https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13600.003.0014  

   Ješovnik, Ana; Schultz, Ted R (February 2022, The MIT Press)
3. Harnessing AI to Transform Agriculture and Inform Agricultural Research

   https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2020.2986124  

   Peters, Debra P.; Rivers, Adam; Hatfield, Jerry L.; Lemay, Danielle G.; Liu, Simon; Basso, Bruno (May 2020, IT Professional)
4. Agricultural Innovations to Reduce the Health Impacts of Dams

   https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041869  

   Lund, Andrea J.; Lopez-Carr, David; Sokolow, Susanne H.; Rohr, Jason R.; De Leo, Giulio A. (February 2021, Sustainability)

   null (Ed.)

   Dams enable the production of food and renewable energy, making them a crucial tool for both economic development and climate change adaptation in low- and middle-income countries. However, dams may also disrupt traditional livelihood systems and increase the transmission of vector- and water-borne pathogens. These livelihood and health impacts diminish the benefits of dams to rural populations dependent on rivers, as hydrological and ecological alterations change flood regimes, reduce nutrient transport and lead to the loss of biodiversity. We propose four agricultural innovations for promoting equity, health, sustainable development, and climate resilience in dammed watersheds: (1) restoring migratory aquatic species, (2) removing submerged vegetation and transforming it into an agricultural resource, (3) restoring environmental flows and (4) integrating agriculture and aquaculture. As investment in dams accelerates in low- and middle-income countries, appropriately addressing their livelihood and health impacts can improve the sustainability of modern agriculture and economic development in a changing climate. 

   more » « less
5. Sulfur isotopes reveal agricultural changes to the modern sulfur cycle

   https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6683  

   Hermes, Anna L.; Dawson, Todd E.; Hinckley, Eve-Lyn S. (April 2022, Environmental Research Letters)

   Abstract The environmental fates and consequences of intensive sulfur (S) applications to croplands are largely unknown. In this study, we used S stable isotopes to identify and trace agricultural S from field-to-watershed scales, an initial and timely step toward constraining the modern S cycle. We conducted our research within the Napa River Watershed, California, US, where vineyards receive frequent fungicidal S sprays. We measured soil and surface water sulfate concentrations ([SO₄²⁻]) and stable isotopes (δ³⁴S–SO₄²⁻), which we refer to in combination as the ‘S fingerprint’. We compared samples collected from vineyards and surrounding forests/grasslands, which receive background atmospheric and geologic S sources. Vineyardδ³⁴S–SO₄²⁻values were 9.9 ± 5.9‰ (median ± interquartile range), enriched by ∼10‰ relative to forests/grasslands (−0.28 ± 5.7‰). Vineyards also had roughly three-fold higher [SO₄²⁻] than forests/grasslands (13.6 and 5.0 mg SO₄²⁻–S l⁻¹, respectively). Napa Riverδ³⁴S–SO₄²⁻values, reflecting the watershed scale, were similar to those from vineyards (10.5 ± 7.0‰), despite vineyard agriculture constituting only ∼11% of the watershed area. Combined, our results provide important evidence that agricultural S is traceable at field-to-watershed scales, a critical step toward determining the consequences of agricultural alterations to the modern S cycle. 

   more » « less