More Like this

1. The role of inclusion, discrimination, and belonging for adolescent Science, Technology, Engineering and Math engagement in and out of school

   https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21762  

   Mulvey, Kelly Lynn ; J. Mathews, Channing ; Knox, Jerica ; Joy, Angelina ; Cerda‐Smith, Jacqueline ( October 2022 , Journal of Research in Science Teaching)
2. Developing and validating Next Generation Science Standards ‐aligned learning progression to track three‐dimensional learning of electrical interactions in high school physical science

   https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21672  

   Kaldaras, Leonora ; Akaeze, Hope ; Krajcik, Joseph ( October 2020 , Journal of Research in Science Teaching)

   The Framework for K‐12 science education (TheFramework) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) emphasize the usefulness of learning progressions in helping align curriculum, instruction, and assessment to organize the learning process. TheFrameworkdefines three dimensions of science as the basis of theoretical learning progressions described in the document and used to develop NGSS. The three dimensions include disciplinary core ideas, scientific and engineering practices, and crosscutting concepts. TheFrameworkdefines three‐dimensional learning (3D learning) as integrating scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas to make sense of phenomena. Three‐dimensional learning leads to the development of a deep, useable understanding of big ideas that students can apply to explain phenomena and solve real‐life problems. While theFrameworkdescribes the theoretical basis of 3D learning, and NGSS outlines possible theoretical learning progressions for the three dimensions across grades, we currently have very limited empirical evidence to show that a learning progression for 3D learning can be developed and validated in practice. In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of developing a 3D learning progression (3D LP) supported by qualitative and quantitative validity evidence. We first present a hypothetical 3D LP aligned to a previously designed NGSS‐based curriculum. We further present multiple sources of validity evidence for the hypothetical 3D LP, including interview analysis and item response theory (IRT) analysis to show validity evidence for the 3D LP. Finally, we demonstrate the feasibility of using the assessment tool designed to probe levels of the 3D LP for assigning 3D LP levels to individual student answers, which is essential for the practical applicability of any LP. This work demonstrates the usefulness of validated 3D LP for organizing the learning process in the NGSS classroom, which is essential for the successful implementation of NGSS.

    

   more » « less
3. P acific R im A pplications and G rid M iddleware A ssembly ( PRAGMA ): I nternational clouds for data science

   https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4140  

   Plale, Beth ; Chen, Maio ( April 2017 , Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience)
4. Hacking Limnology Workshop and DSOS22 : Creating a Community of Practice for the Nexus of Data Science, Open Science, and the Aquatic Sciences

   https://doi.org/10.1002/lob.10525  

   Meyer, Michael F. ; Barbosa, Carolina C. ; Ladwig, Robert ; Mesman, Jorrit P. ; Börekçi, Nahit Soner ; Cawley, Kaelin ; Feldbauer, Johannes ; Oleksy, Isabella A. ; Pilla, Rachel M. ; Tran, Patricia Q. ; et al ( November 2022 , Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin)
5. The AEMON‐J “Hacking Limnology” Workshop Series & Virtual Summit: Incorporating Data Science and Open Science in Aquatic Research

   https://doi.org/10.1002/lob.10475  

   Meyer, Michael F. ; Ladwig, Robert ; Mesman, Jorrit P. ; Oleksy, Isabella A. ; Barbosa, Carolina C. ; Cawley, Kaelin M. ; Cramer, Alli N. ; Feldbauer, Johannes ; Tran, Patricia Q. ; Zwart, Jacob A. ; et al ( November 2021 , Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin)