Sensory systems enable organisms to detect and respond to environmental signals relevant for their survival and reproduction. A crucial aspect of any sensory signal is its intensity; understanding how sensory signals guide behavior requires probing sensory system function across the range of stimulus intensities naturally experienced by an organism. In olfaction, defining the range of natural odorant concentrations is difficult. Odors are complex mixtures of airborne chemicals emitting from a source in an irregular pattern that varies across time and space, necessitating specialized methods to obtain an accurate measurement of concentration. Perhaps as a result, experimentalists often choose stimulus concentrations based on empirical considerations rather than with respect to ecological or behavioral context. Here, we attempt to determine naturally relevant concentration ranges for olfactory stimuli by reviewing and integrating data from diverse disciplines. We compare odorant concentrations used in experimental studies in rodents and insects with those reported in different settings including ambient natural environments, the headspace of natural sources, and within the sources themselves. We also compare these values to psychophysical measurements of odorant detection threshold in rodents, where thresholds have been extensively measured. Odorant concentrations in natural regimes rarely exceed a few parts per billion, while most experimental studies investigating olfactory coding and behavior exceed these concentrations by several orders of magnitude. We discuss the implications of this mismatch and the importance of testing odorants in their natural concentration range for understanding neural mechanisms underlying olfactory sensation and odor-guided behaviors.
more »
« less
Hyperbolic odorant mixtures as a basis for more efficient signaling between flowering plants and bees
Animals use odors in many natural contexts, for example, for finding mates or food, or signaling danger. Most analyses of natural odors search for either the most meaningful components of a natural odor mixture, or they use linear metrics to analyze the mixture compositions. However, we have recently shown that the physical space for complex mixtures is ‘hyperbolic’, meaning that there are certain combinations of variables that have a disproportionately large impact on perception and that these variables have specific interpretations in terms of metabolic processes taking place inside the flower and fruit that produce the odors. Here we show that the statistics of odorants and odorant mixtures produced by inflorescences ( Brassica rapa ) are also better described with a hyperbolic rather than a linear metric, and that combinations of odorants in the hyperbolic space are better predictors of the nectar and pollen resources sought by bee pollinators than the standard Euclidian combinations. We also show that honey bee and bumble bee antennae can detect most components of the B . rapa odor space that we tested, and the strength of responses correlates with positions of odorants in the hyperbolic space. In sum, a hyperbolic representation can be used to guide investigation of how information is represented at different levels of processing in the CNS.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10389230
- Editor(s):
- Rueppell, Olav
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- PLOS ONE
- Volume:
- 17
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 1932-6203
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- e0270358
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract In mammals, olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) are born throughout life, presumably solely to replace neurons lostviaturnover or injury. This assumption follows from the hypothesis that olfactory neurogenesis is strictly stochastic with respect to neuron subtype, as defined by the single odorant receptor allele that each neural precursor stochastically chooses out of hundreds of possibilities. This hypothesis is challenged by recent findings that the birthrates of a fraction of subtypes are selectively diminished by olfactory deprivation. These findings raise questions about how, and why, olfactory stimuli are required to promote the neurogenesis of some OSN subtypes, including whether the stimuli are generic (e.g., broadly activating odors or mechanical stimuli) or specific (e.g., discrete odorants). Based on RNA-seq and scRNA-seq analyses, we hypothesized that the neurogenic stimuli are specific odorants that selectively activate the same OSN subtypes whose birthrates are accelerated. In support of this, we have found, using subtype-specific OSN birthdating, that exposure to male and musk odors can accelerate the birthrates of responsive OSNs. Collectively, our findings reveal that certain odor experiences can selectively “amplify” specific OSN subtypes, and that persistent OSN neurogenesis may serve, in part, an adaptive function.more » « less
-
Animals smelling in the real world use a small number of receptors to sense a vast number of natural molecular mixtures, and proceed to learn arbitrary associations between odors and valences. Here, we propose how the architecture of olfactory circuits leverages disorder, diffuse sensing and redundancy in representation to meet these immense complementary challenges. First, the diffuse and disordered binding of receptors to many molecules compresses a vast but sparsely-structured odor space into a small receptor space, yielding an odor code that preserves similarity in a precise sense. Introducing any order/structure in the sensing degrades similarity preservation. Next, lateral interactions further reduce the correlation present in the low-dimensional receptor code. Finally, expansive disordered projections from the periphery to the central brain reconfigure the densely packed information into a high-dimensional representation, which contains multiple redundant subsets from which downstream neurons can learn flexible associations and valences. Moreover, introducing any order in the expansive projections degrades the ability to recall the learned associations in the presence of noise. We test our theory empirically using data from Drosophila . Our theory suggests that the neural processing of sparse but high-dimensional olfactory information differs from the other senses in its fundamental use of disorder.more » « less
-
The goal of odor source separation and identification from real-world data presents a challenging problem. Both individual odors of potential interest and multisource odor scenes constitute linear combinations of analytes present at different concentrations. The mixing of these analytes can exert nonlinear and even nonmonotonic effects on cross-responsive chemosensors, effectively occluding diagnostic activity patterns across the array. Neuromorphic algorithms, inspired by specific computational strategies of the mammalian olfactory system, have been trained to rapidly learn and reconstruct arbitrary odor source signatures in the presence of background interference. However, such networks perform best when tuned to the statistics of well-behaved inputs, normalized and predictable in their activity distributions. Deployment of chemosensor arrays in the wild exposes these networks to disruptive effects that exceed these tolerances. To address the problems inherent to chemosensory signal conditioning and representation learning, the olfactory bulb deploys an array of strategies: (1) shunting inhibition in the glomerular layer implements divisive normalization, contributing to concentration-invariant representations; (2) feedforward gain diversification (synaptic weight heterogeneity) regularizes spiking activity in the external plexiform layer (mitral and granule cells), enabling the network to handle unregulated inputs; (3) gamma-band oscillations segment activity into packets, enabling a spike phase code and iterative denoising; (4) excitatory and inhibitory spike timing dependent learning rules induce hierarchical attraction basins, enabling the network to map its highly complex inputs to regions of a lower dimensional manifold; (5) neurogenesis in the granule cell layer enables lifelong learning and prevents order effects (regularizing the learned synaptic weight distribution over the span of training). Here, we integrate these motifs into a single neuromorphic model, bringing together prior OB-inspired model architectures. In a series of simulation experiments including real-world data from a chemosensor array, we demonstrate the network’s ability to learn and detect complex odorants in variable environments despite unpredictable noise distributions.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract Multimodal warning displays often pair one signal modality (odor) with a second modality (color) to avoid predation. Experiments with bird predators suggest these signal components interact synergistically, with aversive odors triggering otherwise hidden aversions to particular prey colors. In a recent study, this phenomenon was found in a jumping spider ( Habronattus trimaculatus ), with the defensive odor from a coreid bug ( Acanthocephala femorata ) triggering an aversion to red. Here, we explore how generalizable this phenomenon is by giving H. trimaculatus the choice between red or black prey in the presence or absence of defensive odors secreted from (1) eastern leaf-footed bugs ( Leptoglossus phyllopus , Hemiptera), (2) grass stinkbugs ( Mormidea pama , Hemiptera), (3) Asian ladybird beetles ( Harmonia axyridis , Coleoptera), and (4) eastern lubber grasshoppers ( Romalea microptera , Orthoptera). As expected, in the presence of the hemipteran odors, spiders were less likely to attack red prey (compared to no odor). Unexpectedly, the beetle and grasshopper odors did not bias spiders away from red. Our results with the hemipteran odors were unique to red; follow-up experiments indicated that these odors did not affect biases for/against green prey. We discuss our findings in the context of generalized predator foraging behavior and the functions of multimodal warning displays.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

