More Like this

1. Real or Fake Text?: Investigating Human Ability to Detect Boundaries Between Human-Written and Machine-Generated Text

   Dugan, Liam; Ippolito, Daphne; Kirubarajan, Arun; Shi, Sherry; Callison-Burch, Chris (February 2023, Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence)

   As text generated by large language models proliferates, it becomes vital to understand how humans engage with such text, and whether or not they are able to detect when the text they are reading did not originate with a human writer. Prior work on human detection of generated text focuses on the case where an entire passage is either human-written or machine-generated. In this paper, we study a more realistic setting where text begins as human-written and transitions to being generated by state-of-the-art neural language models. We show that, while annotators often struggle at this task, there is substantial variance in annotator skill and that given proper incentives, annotators can improve at this task over time. Furthermore, we conduct a detailed comparison study and analyze how a variety of variables (model size, decoding strategy, fine-tuning, prompt genre, etc.) affect human detection performance. Finally, we collect error annotations from our participants and use them to show that certain textual genres influence models to make different types of errors and that certain sentence-level features correlate highly with annotator selection. We release the RoFT dataset: a collection of over 21,000 human annotations paired with error classifications to encourage future work in human detection and evaluation of generated text. 

   more » « less
2. Large Language Model Annotation Bias in Hate Speech Detection

   https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35879  

   Okpala, Ebuka; Cheng, Long (June 2025, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media)

   Large language models (LLMs) are fast becoming ubiquitous and have shown impressive performance in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Annotating data for downstream applications is a resource-intensive task in NLP. Recently, the use of LLMs as a cost-effective data annotator for annotating data used to train other models or as an assistive tool has been explored. Yet, little is known regarding the societal implications of using LLMs for data annotation. In this work, focusing on hate speech detection, we investigate how using LLMs such as GPT-4 and Llama-3 for hate speech detection can lead to different performances for different text dialects and racial bias in online hate detection classifiers. We used LLMs to predict hate speech in seven hate speech datasets and trained classifiers on the LLM annotations of each dataset. Using tweets written in African-American English (AAE) and Standard American English (SAE), we show that classifiers trained on LLM annotations assign tweets written in AAE to negative classes (e.g., hate, offensive, abuse, racism, etc.) at a higher rate than tweets written in SAE and that the classifiers have a higher false positive rate towards AAE tweets. We explore the effect of incorporating dialect priming in the prompting techniques used in prediction, showing that introducing dialect increases the rate at which AAE tweets are assigned to negative classes. 

   more » « less
3. MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontiers

   Pillutla, Krishna; Swayamdipta, Swabha; Zellers, Rowan; Thickstun, John; Welleck, Sean; hoi, Yejin; Harchaoui, Zaid (January 2022, Advances in neural information processing systems)

   As major progress is made in open-ended text generation, measuring how close machine-generated text is to human language remains a critical open problem. We introduce MAUVE, a comparison measure for open-ended text generation, which directly compares the learnt distribution from a text generation model to the distribution of human-written text using divergence frontiers. MAUVE scales up to modern text generation models by computing information divergences in a quantized embedding space. Through an extensive empirical study on three open-ended generation tasks, we find that MAUVE identifies known properties of generated text, scales naturally with model size, and correlates with human judgments, with fewer restrictions than existing distributional evaluation metrics. 

   more » « less
4. FALTE: A Toolkit for Fine-grained Annotation for Long Text Evaluation

   Goyal, Tanya; Li, Junyi Jessy; Durrett, Greg (December 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations)

   A growing swath of NLP research is tackling problems related to generating long text, including tasks such as open-ended story generation, summarization, dialogue, and more. However, we currently lack appropriate tools to evaluate these long outputs of generation models: classic automatic metrics such as ROUGE have been shown to perform poorly, and newer learned metrics do not necessarily work well for all tasks and domains of text. Human rating and error analysis remains a crucial component for any evaluation of long text generation. In this paper, we introduce FALTE, a web-based annotation toolkit designed to address this shortcoming. Our tool allows researchers to collect fine-grained judgments of text quality from crowdworkers using an error taxonomy specific to the downstream task. Using the task interface, annotators can select and assign error labels to text span selections in an incremental paragraph-level annotation workflow. The latter functionality is designed to simplify the document-level task into smaller units and reduce cognitive load on the annotators. Our tool has previously been used to run a large-scale annotation study that evaluates the coherence of long generated summaries, demonstrating its utility. 

   more » « less
5. On the Zero-Shot Generalization of Machine-Generated Text Detectors

   https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.318  

   Pu, Xiao; Zhang, Jingyu; Han, Xiaochuang; Tsvetkov, Yulia; He, Tianxing (January 2023, Association for Computational Linguistics)

   The rampant proliferation of large language models, fluent enough to generate text indistinguishable from human-written language, gives unprecedented importance to the detection of machine-generated text. This work is motivated by an important research question: How will the detectors of machine-generated text perform on outputs of a new generator, that the detectors were not trained on? We begin by collecting generation data from a wide range of LLMs, and train neural detectors on data from each generator and test its performance on held-out generators. While none of the detectors can generalize to all generators, we observe a consistent and interesting pattern that the detectors trained on data from a medium-size LLM can zero-shot generalize to the larger version. As a concrete application, we demonstrate that robust detectors can be built on an ensemble of training data from medium-sized models. 

   more » « less