skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Divide-and-Conquer Determinization of Büchi Automata Based on SCC Decomposition
The determinization of a nondeterministic Büchi automaton (NBA) is a fundamental construction of automata theory, with applications to probabilistic verification and reactive synthesis. The standard determinization constructions, such as the ones based on the Safra-Piterman’s approach, work on the whole NBA. In this work we propose a divide-and-conquer determinization approach. To this end, we first classify the strongly connected components (SCCs) of the given NBA as inherently weak, deterministic accepting, and nondeterministic accepting. We then present how to determinize each type of SCC independently from the others; this results in an easier handling of the determinization algorithm that takes advantage of the structure of that SCC. Once all SCCs have been determinized, we show how to compose them so to obtain the final equivalent deterministic Emerson-Lei automaton, which can be converted into a deterministic Rabin automaton without blow-up of states and transitions. We implement our algorithm in our tool COLA and empirically evaluate COLA with the state-of-the-art tools Spot and Owl on a large set of benchmarks from the literature. The experimental results show that our prototype COLA outperforms Spot and Owl regarding the number of states and transitions.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1704883
PAR ID:
10391914
Author(s) / Creator(s):
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Book cover Book cover International Conference on Computer Aided Verification
Page Range / eLocation ID:
152-173
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; (, International Symposium on Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis (ATVA 2022))
    Bouajjani, A.; Holík, L.; Wu, Z. (Ed.)
    When omega-regular objectives were first proposed in model-free reinforcement learning (RL) for controlling MDPs, deterministic Rabin automata were used in an attempt to provide a direct translation from their transitions to scalar values. While these translations failed, it has turned out that it is possible to repair them by using good-for-MDPs (GFM) Buechi automata instead. These are nondeterministic Buechi automata with a restricted type of nondeterminism, albeit not as restricted as in good-for-games automata. Indeed, deterministic Rabin automata have a pretty straightforward translation to such GFM automata, which is bi-linear in the number of states and pairs. Interestingly, the same cannot be said for deterministic Streett automata: a translation to nondeterministic Rabin or Buechi automata comes at an exponential cost, even without requiring the target automaton to be good-for-MDPs. Do we have to pay more than that to obtain a good-for-MDPs automaton? The surprising answer is that we have to pay significantly less when we instead expand the good-for-MDPs property to alternating automata: like the nondeterministic GFM automata obtained from deterministic Rabin automata, the alternating good-for-MDPs automata we produce from deterministic Streett automata are bi-linear in the size of the deterministic automaton and its index. They can therefore be exponentially more succinct than the minimal nondeterministic Buechi automaton. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; (, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages)
    Motivated by distributed data processing applications, we introduce a class of labeled directed acyclic graphs constructed using sequential and parallel composition operations, and study automata and logics over them. We show that deterministic and non-deterministic acceptors over such graphs have the same expressive power, which can be equivalently characterized by Monadic Second-Order logic and the graded µ-calculus. We establish closure under composition operations and decision procedures for membership, emptiness, and inclusion. A key feature of our graphs, calledsynchronized series-parallel graphs(SSPG), is that parallel composition introduces a synchronization edge from the newly introduced source vertex to the sink. The transfer of information enabled by such edges is crucial to the determinization construction, which would not be possible for the traditional definition of series-parallel graphs. SSPGs allow both ordered ranked parallelism and unordered unranked parallelism. The latter feature means that in the corresponding automata, the transition function needs to account for an arbitrary number of predecessors by counting each type of state only up to a specified constant, thus leading to a notion ofcounting complexitythat is distinct from the classical notion of state complexity. The determinization construction translates a nondeterministic automaton withnstates andkcounting complexity to a deterministic automaton with 2n2states andkncounting complexity, and both these bounds are shown to be tight. Furthermore, for nondeterministic automata a bound of 2 on counting complexity suffices without loss of expressiveness. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023))
    Megow, Nicole; Smith, Adam (Ed.)
    The celebrated IP = PSPACE Theorem gives an efficient interactive proof for any bounded-space algorithm. In this work we study interactive proofs for non-deterministic bounded space computations. While Savitch’s Theorem shows that nondeterministic bounded-space algorithms can be simulated by deterministic bounded-space algorithms, this simulation has a quadratic overhead. We give interactive protocols for nondeterministic algorithms directly to get faster verifiers. More specifically, for any non-deterministic space S algorithm, we construct an interactive proof in which the verifier runs in time Õ(n+S²). This improves on the best previous bound of Õ(n+S³) and matches the result for deterministic space bounded algorithms, up to polylog(S) factors. We further generalize to alternating bounded space algorithms. For any language L decided by a time T, space S algorithm that uses d alternations, we construct an interactive proof in which the verifier runs in time Õ(n + S log(T) + S d) and the prover runs in time 2^O(S). For d = O(log(T)), this matches the best known interactive proofs for deterministic algorithms, up to polylog(S) factors, and improves on the previous best verifier time for nondeterministic algorithms by a factor of log(T). We also improve the best prior verifier time for unbounded alternations by a factor of S. Using known connections of bounded alternation algorithms to bounded depth circuits, we also obtain faster verifiers for bounded depth circuits with unbounded fan-in. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data)
    Computing strongly connected components (SCC) is among the most fundamental problems in graph analytics. Given the large size of today's real-world graphs, parallel SCC implementation is increasingly important. SCC is challenging in the parallel setting and is particularly hard on large-diameter graphs. Many existing parallel SCC implementations can be even slower than Tarjan's sequential algorithm on large-diameter graphs. To tackle this challenge, we propose an efficient parallel SCC implementation using a new parallel reachability approach. Our solution is based on a novel idea referred to as vertical granularity control (VGC). It breaks the synchronization barriers to increase parallelism and hide scheduling overhead. To use VGC in our SCC algorithm, we also design an efficient data structure called the parallel hash bag. It uses parallel dynamic resizing to avoid redundant work in maintaining frontiers (vertices processed in a round). We implement the parallel SCC algorithm by Blelloch et al. (J. ACM, 2020) using our new parallel reachability approach. We compare our implementation to the state-of-the-art systems, including GBBS, iSpan, Multi-step, and our highly optimized Tarjan's (sequential) algorithm, on 18 graphs, including social, web, k-NN, and lattice graphs. On a machine with 96 cores, our implementation is the fastest on 16 out of 18 graphs. On average (geometric means) over all graphs, our SCC is 6.0× faster than the best previous parallel code (GBBS), 12.8× faster than Tarjan's sequential algorithms, and 2.7× faster than the best existing implementation on each graph. We believe that our techniques are of independent interest. We also apply our parallel hash bag and VGC scheme to other graph problems, including connectivity and least-element lists (LE-lists). Our implementations improve the performance of the state-of-the-art parallel implementations for these two problems. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, IJCAI)
    Synthesis techniques for temporal logic specifications are typically based on exploiting symbolic techniques, as done in model checking. These symbolic techniques typically use backward fixpoint computation. Planning, which can be seen as a specific form of synthesis, is a witness of the success of forward search approaches. In this paper, we develop a forward-search approach to full-fledged Linear Temporal Logic on finite traces (LTLf) synthesis. We show how to compute the Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) of an LTLf formula on-the-fly, while performing an adversarial forward search towards the final states, by considering the DFA as a sort of AND-OR graph. Our approach is characterized by branching on suitable propositional formulas, instead of individual evaluations, hence radically reducing the branching factor of the search space. Specifically, we take advantage of techniques developed for knowledge compilation, such as Sentential Decision Diagrams (SDDs), to implement the approach efficiently. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email