An official website of the United States government
Speculative execution attacks like Spectre and Meltdown exploit hardware performance optimization features to illegally access a secret and then leak the secret to an unauthorized recipient. Many variants of speculative execution attacks (also called transient execution attacks) have been proposed in the last few years, and new ones are constantly being discovered. While software mitigations for some attacks have been proposed, they often cause very significant performance degradation. Hardware solutions are also being proposed actively by the research community, especially as these are attacks on hardware microarchitecture. In this talk, we identify the critical steps in a speculative attack, and the root cause of successful attacks. We define the concept of "security dependencies", which should be implemented to prevent data leaks and other security breaches. We propose a taxonomy of defense strategies and show how proposed hardware defenses fall under each defense strategy. We discuss security-performance tradeoffs, which can decrease the performance overhead while still preventing security breaches. We suggest design principles for future security-aware microarchitecture.
more »
« less
SoK: Hardware Defenses Against Speculative Execution Attacks
Speculative execution attacks leverage the speculative and out-of-order execution features in modern computer processors to access secret data or execute code that should not be executed. Secret information can then be leaked through a covert channel. While software patches can be installed for mitigation on existing hardware, these solutions can incur big performance overhead. Hardware mitigation is being studied extensively by the computer architecture community. It has the benefit of preserving software compatibility and the potential for much smaller performance overhead than software solutions. This paper presents a systematization of the hardware defenses against speculative execution attacks that have been proposed. We show that speculative execution attacks consist of 6 critical attack steps. We propose defense strategies, each of which prevents a critical attack step from happening, thus preventing the attack from succeeding. We then summarize 20 hardware defenses and overhead-reducing features that have been proposed. We show that each defense proposed can be classified under one of our defense strategies, which also explains why it can thwart the attack from succeeding. We discuss the scope of the defenses, their performance overhead, and the security-performance trade-offs that can be made.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1814190
- PAR ID:
- 10392176
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 2021 International Symposium on Secure and Private Execution Environment Design (SEED)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 108 to 120
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Spectre and Meltdown attacks and their variants exploit hardware performance optimization features to cause security breaches. Secret information is accessed and leaked through covert or side channels. New attack variants keep appearing and we do not have a systematic way to capture the critical characteristics of these attacks and evaluate why they succeed or fail.In this paper, we provide a new attack-graph model for reasoning about speculative execution attacks. We model attacks as ordered dependency graphs, and prove that a race condition between two nodes can occur if there is a missing dependency edge between them. We define a new concept, “security dependency”, between a resource access and its prior authorization operation. We show that a missing security dependency is equivalent to a race condition between authorization and access, which is a root cause of speculative execution attacks. We show detailed examples of how our attack graph models the Spectre and Meltdown attacks, and is generalizable to all the attack variants published so far. This attack model is also very useful for identifying new attacks and for generalizing defense strategies. We identify several defense strategies with different performance-security tradeoffs. We show that the defenses proposed so far all fit under one of our defense strategies. We also explain how attack graphs can be constructed and point to this as promising future work for tool designersmore » « less
-
Rootkits are malware that attempt to compromise the system’s functionalities while hiding their existence. Various rootkits have been proposed as well as different software defenses, but only very few hardware defenses. We position hardware-enhanced rootkit defenses as an interesting research opportunity for computer architects, especially as many new hardware defenses for speculative execution attacks are being actively considered. We first describe different techniques used by rootkits and their prime targets in the operating system. We then try to shed insights on what the main challenges are in providing a rootkit defense, and how these may be overcome. We show how a hypervisor-based defense can be implemented, and provide a full prototype implementation in an open-source cloud computing platform, OpenStack. We evaluate the performance overhead of different defense mechanisms. Finally, we point to some research opportunities for enhancing resilience to rootkit-like attacks in the hardware architecture.more » « less
-
Speculative execution is an essential performance enhancing technique in modern processors, but it has been shown to be insecure. In this paper, we propose SpectreGuard, a novel defense mechanism against Spectre attacks. In our approach, sensitive memory blocks (e.g., secret keys) are marked using simple OS/library API, which are then selectively protected by hardware from Spectre attacks via low-cost micro-architecture extension. This technique allows microprocessors to maintain high performance, while restoring the control to software developers to make security and performance trade-offs.more » « less
-
As computing devices become more commonplace in every day life, we have seen an increase of possible attacks on commercial devices and critical infrastructure. As a result, both academia and industry have proposed solutions to mitigate or outright eliminate the ever expanding set of viable targets. Initially, this resulted in an influx of software-based defenses against these emerging threats. Unfortunately, it was found that software solutions could be bypassed with more advanced attacks and often resulted in high performance overhead. As such, hardware-assisted security defenses have been developed to provide improved security while keeping performance overhead to manageable levels, especially for IoT devices. In this paper, we will provide a survey of prominent hardware-assisted security defenses. We will enumerate the attacks these defenses aim to protect, as well as their effectiveness. We will also discuss the implications in both performance and system design. A comparison between approaches that target the same set of issues, and possible directions for future research will be presented.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/SEED51797.2021.00023
