More Like this

1. Approximation Algorithms for Socially Fair Clustering

   Makarychev, Yury ; Vakilian, Ali ( January 2021 , Proceedings of the Conference on Learning Theory, PMLR)

   Belkin, Mikhail ; Kpotufe, Samor (Ed.)

   We present an $e^{O(p)} (\log \ell) / (\log \log \ell)$-approximation algorithm for socially fair clustering with the $\ell_p$-objective. In this problem, we are given a set of points in a metric space. Each point belongs to one (or several) of $\ell$ groups. The goal is to find a $k$-medians, $k$-means, or, more generally, $\ell_p$-clustering that is simultaneously good for all of the groups. More precisely, we need to find a set of $k$ centers $C$ so as to minimize the maximum over all groups $j$ of $\sum_{u \text{ in group } j} d(u, C)^p$. The socially fair clustering problem was independently proposed by Abbasi, Bhaskara, and Venkatasubramanian (2021) and Ghadiri, Samadi, and Vempala (2021). Our algorithm improves and generalizes their $O(\ell)$-approximation algorithms for the problem. The natural LP relaxation for the problem has an integrality gap of $\Omega(\ell)$. In order to obtain our result, we introduce a strengthened LP relaxation and show that it has an integrality gap of $\Theta((\log \ell) / (\log \log \ell))$ for a fixed p. Additionally, we present a bicriteria approximation algorithm, which generalizes the bicriteria approximation of Abbasi et al. (2021). 

   more » « less
2. A New Notion of Individually Fair Clustering: alpha-Equitable k-Center

   Chakrabarti, D ; Dickerson, J. P. ; Esmaeili, S. A. ; Srinivasan, A. ; Tsepenekas, L. ( March 2022 , Proc. International Conference on Artifical Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS))

   Clustering is a fundamental problem in unsupervised machine learning, and due to its numerous societal implications fair variants of it have recently received significant attention. In this work we introduce a novel definition of individual fairness for clustering problems. Specifically, in our model, each point j has a set of other points S(j) that it perceives as similar to itself, and it feels that it is being fairly treated if the quality of service it receives in the solution is α-close (in a multiplicative sense, for some given α ≥ 1) to that of the points in S(j). We begin our study by answering questions regarding the combinatorial structure of the problem, namely for what values of α the problem is well-defined, and what the behavior of the Price of Fairness (PoF) for it is. For the well-defined region of α, we provide efficient and easily-implementable approximation algorithms for the k-center objective, which in certain cases also enjoy bounded-PoF guarantees. We finally complement our analysis by an extensive suite of experiments that validates the effectiveness of our theoretical results. 

   more » « less
3. Which Lp norm is the fairest? Approximations for fair facility location across all "p"

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3580507.3597664  

   Gupta, Swati ; Moondra, Jai ; Singh, Mohit ( July 2023 , EC '23: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation)

   Given a set of facilities and clients, and costs to open facilities, the classic facility location problem seeks to open a set of facilities and assign each client to one open facility to minimize the cost of opening the chosen facilities and the total distance of the clients to their assigned open facilities. Such an objective may induce an unequal cost over certain socioeconomic groups of clients (i.e., total distance traveled by clients in such a group). This is important when planning the location of socially relevant facilities such as emergency rooms. In this work, we consider a fair version of the problem where we are given 𝑟 clients groups that partition the set of clients, and the distance of a given group is defined as the average distance of clients in the group to their respective open facilities. The objective is to minimize the Minkowski 𝑝-norm of vector of group distances, to penalize high access costs to open facilities across 𝑟 groups of clients. This generalizes classic facility location (𝑝 = 1) and the minimization of the maximum group distance (𝑝 = ∞). However, in practice, fairness criteria may not be explicit or even known to a decision maker, and it is often unclear how to select a specific "𝑝" to model the cost of unfairness. To get around this, we study the notion of solution portfolios where for a fixed problem instance, we seek a small portfolio of solutions such that for any Minkowski norm 𝑝, one of these solutions is an 𝑂(1)-approximation. Using the geometric relationship between various 𝑝-norms, we show the existence of a portfolio of cardinality 𝑂(log 𝑟), and a lower bound of (\sqrt{log r}). There may not be common structure across different solutions in this portfolio, which can make planning difficult if the notion of fairness changes over time or if the budget to open facilities is disbursed over time. For example, small changes in 𝑝 could lead to a completely different set of open facilities in the portfolio. Inspired by this, we introduce the notion of refinement, which is a family of solutions for each 𝑝-norm satisfying a combinatorial property. This property requires that (1) the set of facilities open for a higher 𝑝-norm must be a subset of the facilities open for a lower 𝑝-norm, and (2) all clients assigned to an open facility for a lower 𝑝-norm must be assigned to the same open facility for any higher 𝑝-norm. A refinement is 𝛼-approximate if the solution for each 𝑝-norm problem is an 𝛼-approximation for it. We show that it is sufficient to consider only 𝑂(log 𝑟) norms instead of all 𝑝-norms, 𝑝 ∈ [1, ∞] to construct refinements. A natural greedy algorithm for the problem gives a poly(𝑟)-approximate refinement, which we improve to poly(r^1/\sqrt{log 𝑟})-approximate using a recursive algorithm. We improve this ratio to 𝑂(log 𝑟) for the special case of tree metric for uniform facility open cost. Our recursive algorithm extends to other settings, including to a hierarchical facility location problem that models facility location problems at several levels, such as public works departments and schools. A full version of this paper can be found at https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14873. 

   more » « less
4. Universal Algorithms for Clustering

   Bruce Maggs, Arun Ganesh ( April 2021 , Leibniz international proceedings in informatics)

   Bansal, Nikhil and (Ed.)

   his paper presents universal algorithms for clustering problems, including the widely studied k-median, k-means, and k-center objectives. The input is a metric space containing all potential client locations. The algorithm must select k cluster centers such that they are a good solution for any subset of clients that actually realize. Specifically, we aim for low regret, defined as the maximum over all subsets of the difference between the cost of the algorithm’s solution and that of an optimal solution. A universal algorithm’s solution sol for a clustering problem is said to be an (α, β)-approximation if for all subsets of clients C', it satisfies sol(C') ≤ α ⋅ opt(C') + β ⋅ mr, where opt(C') is the cost of the optimal solution for clients C' and mr is the minimum regret achievable by any solution. Our main results are universal algorithms for the standard clustering objectives of k-median, k-means, and k-center that achieve (O(1), O(1))-approximations. These results are obtained via a novel framework for universal algorithms using linear programming (LP) relaxations. These results generalize to other 𝓁_p-objectives and the setting where some subset of the clients are fixed. We also give hardness results showing that (α, β)-approximation is NP-hard if α or β is at most a certain constant, even for the widely studied special case of Euclidean metric spaces. This shows that in some sense, (O(1), O(1))-approximation is the strongest type of guarantee obtainable for universal clustering. 

   more » « less
5. Algorithms for covering multiple submodular constraints and applications

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-022-00874-x  

   Chekuri, Chandra ; Inamdar, Tanmay ; Quanrud, Kent ; Varadarajan, Kasturi ; Zhang, Zhao ( June 2022 , Journal of Combinatorial Optimization)

   We consider the problem of covering multiple submodular constraints. Given a finite ground setN, a weight function$$w: N \rightarrow \mathbb {R}_+$$$w:N\to R_{+}$,rmonotone submodular functions$$f_1,f_2,\ldots ,f_r$$$f_1,f_2,\dots ,f_r$overNand requirements$$k_1,k_2,\ldots ,k_r$$$k_1,k_2,\dots ,k_r$the goal is to find a minimum weight subset$$S \subseteq N$$$S\subseteq N$such that$$f_i(S) \ge k_i$$$f_i\left(S\right)\ge k_i$for$$1 \le i \le r$$$1\le i\le r$. We refer to this problem asMulti-Submod-Coverand it was recently considered by Har-Peled and Jones (Few cuts meet many point sets. CoRR.arxiv:abs1808.03260Har-Peled and Jones 2018) who were motivated by an application in geometry. Even with$$r=1$$$r=1$Multi-Submod-Covergeneralizes the well-known Submodular Set Cover problem (Submod-SC), and it can also be easily reduced toSubmod-SC. A simple greedy algorithm gives an$$O(\log (kr))$$$O(log(kr\left)\right)$approximation where$$k = \sum _i k_i$$$k={\sum }_i{k}_i$and this ratio cannot be improved in the general case. In this paper, motivated by several concrete applications, we consider two ways to improve upon the approximation given by the greedy algorithm. First, we give a bicriteria approximation algorithm forMulti-Submod-Coverthat covers each constraint to within a factor of$$(1-1/e-\varepsilon )$$$(1-1/e-\epsilon )$while incurring an approximation of$$O(\frac{1}{\epsilon }\log r)$$$O(\frac{1}{ϵ}logr)$in the cost. Second, we consider the special case when each$$f_i$$$f_i$is a obtained from a truncated coverage function and obtain an algorithm that generalizes previous work on partial set cover (Partial-SC), covering integer programs (CIPs) and multiple vertex cover constraints Bera et al. (Theoret Comput Sci 555:2–8 Bera et al. 2014). Both these algorithms are based on mathematical programming relaxations that avoid the limitations of the greedy algorithm. We demonstrate the implications of our algorithms and related ideas to several applications ranging from geometric covering problems to clustering with outliers. Our work highlights the utility of the high-level model and the lens of submodularity in addressing this class of covering problems.

    

   more » « less