This content will become publicly available on June 20, 2023
 Publication Date:
 NSFPAR ID:
 10392770
 Journal Name:
 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
 Page Range or eLocationID:
 814  823
 Sponsoring Org:
 National Science Foundation
More Like this

Belkin, Mikhail ; Kpotufe, Samor (Ed.)We present an $e^{O(p)} (\log \ell) / (\log \log \ell)$approximation algorithm for socially fair clustering with the $\ell_p$objective. In this problem, we are given a set of points in a metric space. Each point belongs to one (or several) of $\ell$ groups. The goal is to find a $k$medians, $k$means, or, more generally, $\ell_p$clustering that is simultaneously good for all of the groups. More precisely, we need to find a set of $k$ centers $C$ so as to minimize the maximum over all groups $j$ of $\sum_{u \text{ in group } j} d(u, C)^p$. The socially fair clustering problem was independently proposed by Abbasi, Bhaskara, and Venkatasubramanian (2021) and Ghadiri, Samadi, and Vempala (2021). Our algorithm improves and generalizes their $O(\ell)$approximation algorithms for the problem. The natural LP relaxation for the problem has an integrality gap of $\Omega(\ell)$. In order to obtain our result, we introduce a strengthened LP relaxation and show that it has an integrality gap of $\Theta((\log \ell) / (\log \log \ell))$ for a fixed p. Additionally, we present a bicriteria approximation algorithm, which generalizes the bicriteria approximation of Abbasi et al. (2021).

Bansal, Nikhil and (Ed.)his paper presents universal algorithms for clustering problems, including the widely studied kmedian, kmeans, and kcenter objectives. The input is a metric space containing all potential client locations. The algorithm must select k cluster centers such that they are a good solution for any subset of clients that actually realize. Specifically, we aim for low regret, defined as the maximum over all subsets of the difference between the cost of the algorithm’s solution and that of an optimal solution. A universal algorithm’s solution sol for a clustering problem is said to be an (α, β)approximation if for all subsets of clients C', it satisfies sol(C') ≤ α ⋅ opt(C') + β ⋅ mr, where opt(C') is the cost of the optimal solution for clients C' and mr is the minimum regret achievable by any solution. Our main results are universal algorithms for the standard clustering objectives of kmedian, kmeans, and kcenter that achieve (O(1), O(1))approximations. These results are obtained via a novel framework for universal algorithms using linear programming (LP) relaxations. These results generalize to other 𝓁_pobjectives and the setting where some subset of the clients are fixed. We also give hardness results showing that (α, β)approximation is NPhard ifmore »

Abstract We consider the problem of covering multiple submodular constraints. Given a finite ground set
N , a weight function ,$$w: N \rightarrow \mathbb {R}_+$$ $w:N\to {R}_{+}$r monotone submodular functions over$$f_1,f_2,\ldots ,f_r$$ ${f}_{1},{f}_{2},\dots ,{f}_{r}$N and requirements the goal is to find a minimum weight subset$$k_1,k_2,\ldots ,k_r$$ ${k}_{1},{k}_{2},\dots ,{k}_{r}$ such that$$S \subseteq N$$ $S\subseteq N$ for$$f_i(S) \ge k_i$$ ${f}_{i}\left(S\right)\ge {k}_{i}$ . We refer to this problem as$$1 \le i \le r$$ $1\le i\le r$MultiSubmodCover and it was recently considered by HarPeled and Jones (Few cuts meet many point sets. CoRR.arxiv:abs1808.03260 HarPeled and Jones 2018) who were motivated by an application in geometry. Even with$$r=1$$ $r=1$MultiSubmodCover generalizes the wellknown Submodular Set Cover problem (SubmodSC ), and it can also be easily reduced toSubmodSC . A simple greedy algorithm gives an approximation where$$O(\log (kr))$$ $O(log(kr\left)\right)$ and this ratio cannot be improved in the general case. In this paper, motivated by several concrete applications, we consider two ways to improve upon the approximation given by the greedy algorithm. First, we give a bicriteria approximation algorithm for$$k = \sum _i k_i$$ $k={\sum}_{i}{k}_{i}$MultiSubmodCover that covers each constraint to within a factor of while incurring an approximation of$$(11/e\varepsilon )$$ $(11/e\epsilon )$ in the cost. Second, we consider the special case when each$$O(\frac{1}{\epsilon }\log r)$$ $O(\frac{1}{\u03f5}logr)$ is a obtained from a truncated coverage function and obtain an algorithm that generalizes previous work on partial set cover ($$f_i$$ ${f}_{i}$PartialSC ), covering integer programs (CIPs ) and multiple vertex cover constraintsmore » 
Embedding properties of network realizations of dissipative reduced order models Jörn Zimmerling, Mikhail Zaslavsky,Rob Remis, Shasri Moskow, Alexander Mamonov, Murthy Guddati, Vladimir Druskin, and Liliana Borcea Mathematical Sciences Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute https://www.wpi.edu/people/vdruskin Abstract Realizations of reduced order models of passive SISO or MIMO LTI problems can be transformed to tridiagonal and blocktridiagonal forms, respectively, via dierent modications of the Lanczos algorithm. Generally, such realizations can be interpreted as ladder resistorcapacitorinductor (RCL) networks. They gave rise to network syntheses in the rst half of the 20th century that was at the base of modern electronics design and consecutively to MOR that tremendously impacted many areas of engineering (electrical, mechanical, aerospace, etc.) by enabling ecient compression of the underlining dynamical systems. In his seminal 1950s works Krein realized that in addition to their compressing properties, network realizations can be used to embed the data back into the state space of the underlying continuum problems. In more recent works of the authors Krein's ideas gave rise to socalled nitedierence Gaussian quadrature rules (FDGQR), allowing to approximately map the ROM statespace representation to its full order continuum counterpart on a judicially chosen grid. Thus, the state variables can be accessed directly from themore »

Clustering is a fundamental unsupervised learning problem where a dataset is partitioned into clusters that consist of nearby points in a metric space. A recent variant, fair clustering, associates a color with each point representing its group membership and requires that each color has (approximately) equal representation in each cluster to satisfy group fairness. In this model, the cost of the clustering objective increases due to enforcing fairness in the algorithm. The relative increase in the cost, the `''price of fairness,'' can indeed be unbounded. Therefore, in this paper we propose to treat an upper bound on the clustering objective as a constraint on the clustering problem, and to maximize equality of representation subject to it. We consider two fairness objectives: the group utilitarian objective and the group egalitarian objective, as well as the group leximin objective which generalizes the group egalitarian objective. We derive fundamental lower bounds on the approximation of the utilitarian and egalitarian objectives and introduce algorithms with provable guarantees for them. For the leximin objective we introduce an effective heuristic algorithm. We further derive impossibility results for other natural fairness objectives. We conclude with experimental results on realworld datasets that demonstrate the validity of our algorithms.