Abstract Resolving the phylogenetic relationships of early amniotes, in particular stem reptiles, remains a difficult problem. Three‐dimensional morphological analysis of well‐preserved stem‐reptile specimens can reveal important anatomical data and clarify regions of phylogeny. Here, we present the first thorough description of the unusual early Permian stem reptileBolosaurus major, including the first comprehensive description of a bolosaurid braincase. We describe previously obscured details of the palate, allowing for insight into bolosaurid feeding mechanics. Aspects of the rostrum, palate, mandible, and neurocranium suggest thatB. majorhad a particularly strong bite. We additionally foundB. majorhas a surprisingly slender stapes, similar to that of the middle Permian stem reptileMacroleter poezicus, which may suggest enhanced hearing abilities compared to other Paleozoic amniotes (e.g., captorhinids). We incorporated our new anatomical information into a large phylogenetic matrix (150 OTUs, 590 characters) to explore the relationship of Bolosauridae among stem reptiles. Our analyses generally recovered a paraphyletic “Parareptilia,” and found Bolosauridae to diverge after Captorhinidae + Araeoscelidia. We also includedB. majorwithin a smaller matrix (10 OTUs, 27 characters) designed to explore the interrelationships of Bolosauridae and found all species ofBolosaurusto be monophyletic. While reptile relationships still require further investigation, our phylogeny suggests repeated evolution of impedance‐matching ears in Paleozoic stem reptiles.
more »
« less
Returning to the roots: resolution, reproducibility, and robusticity in the phylogenetic inference of Dissorophidae (Amphibia: Temnospondyli)
The phylogenetic relationships of most Paleozoic tetrapod clades remain poorly resolved, which is variably attributed to a lack of study, the limitations of inference from phenotypic data, and constant revision of best practices. While refinement of phylogenetic methods continues to be important, any phylogenetic analysis is inherently constrained by the underlying dataset that it analyzes. Therefore, it becomes equally important to assess the accuracy of these datasets, especially when a select few are repeatedly propagated. While repeat analyses of these datasets may appear to constitute a working consensus, they are not in fact independent, and it becomes especially important to evaluate the accuracy of these datasets in order to assess whether a seeming consensus is robust. Here I address the phylogeny of the Dissorophidae, a speciose clade of Paleozoic temnospondyls. This group is an ideal case study among temnospondyls for exploring phylogenetic methods and datasets because it has been extensively studied (eight phylogenetic studies to date) but with most (six studies) using a single matrix that has been propagated with very little modification. In spite of the conserved nature of the matrix, dissorophid studies have produced anything but a conserved topology. Therefore, I analyzed an independently designed matrix, which recovered less resolution and some disparate nodes compared to previous studies. In order to reconcile these differences, I carefully examined previous matrices and analyses. While some differences are a matter of personal preference ( e.g ., analytical software), others relate to discrepancies with respect to what are currently considered as best practices. The most concerning discovery was the identification of pervasive dubious scorings that extend back to the origins of the widely propagated matrix. These include scores for skeletal features that are entirely unknown in a given taxon ( e.g ., postcrania in Cacops woehri ) and characters for which there appear to be unstated working assumptions to scoring that are incompatible with the character definitions ( e.g ., scoring of taxa with incomplete skulls for characters based on skull length). Correction of these scores and other pervasive errors recovered a distinctly less resolved topology than previous studies, more in agreement with my own matrix. This suggests that previous analyses may have been compromised, and that the only real consensus of dissorophid phylogeny is the lack of one.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1947094
- PAR ID:
- 10409447
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- PeerJ
- Volume:
- 9
- ISSN:
- 2167-8359
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- e12423
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Resolving the phylogenetic relationships among Paleocene mammals has been a longstanding goal in paleontology. Constructing an accurate and comprehensive phylogeny for Paleocene mammals is a worthwhile objective in itself, but it also provides a framework on which we can better understand the origin of placental mammals and the evolutionary processes underlying the diversification of mammals before, during, and after the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. More recently, a robust Palaeocene mammal phylogeny has become a much-coveted tool for reconciling discrepancies between morphological and molecular evidence for the phylogeny and diversification of Placentalia. Here, we present a novel phylogenetic dataset to test hypotheses regarding Paleocene mammal phylogeny and the origin and diversification of Placentalia. To date, our matrix combines phenomic data for 36 extant mammal species and 107 fossil species scored for 2540 morphological characters alongside 26 genes sequenced for 47 species. We utilized a reductive morphological scoring strategy in order to minimize assumptions and test hypotheses on homology. Multiple sequence alignments were performed in MEGA-X for each gene. We then analysed the data using Bayesian methods and explored the effects of different approaches. Relaxed clock analyses using a molecular constraint and an FBD prior are congruent with the diversification of many extant orders prior to the K-Pg boundary. Relaxed clocked total-evidence analyses (morphology and molecules) using an FBD prior resulted in older ages of diversification than those estimated by our relaxed clock molecular constraint model and previous molecular studies. Within Placentalia, our phylogenies provide support for the divergence of Atlantogenata (Afrotheria and Xenarthra) from Boreoeutheria (Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria). Among the Paleocene taxa, ‘condylarths’ are distributed along the base of Laurasiatheria with members of ‘Arctocyonidae’ recovered as sister taxa to Artiodactyla; enigmatic groups such as Pantodonta and Taeniodonta are recovered as crown placentals whereas Leptictida is not. Our Paleocene mammal phylogeny is a critical step toward better understanding placental mammal evolution. Ultimately, this work will facilitate the investigation of fundamental questions previously encumbered by the lack of a well-resolved phylogeny.more » « less
-
Metoposaurids are a clade of large-bodied temnospondyls commonly found in non-marine Late Triassic deposits across northern Pangea. Three taxa are known from North America: Anaschisma browni , Apachesaurus gregorii , and “ Metoposaurus ” bakeri . While the osteology of most metoposaurids has been recently revised, that of a few taxa, including “ Metoposaurus ” bakeri remains poorly characterized. This taxon was formally described in 1931 as “ Buettneria bakeri ,” and its taxonomy has remained in flux ever since then. “ Metoposaurus ” bakeri is the earliest appearing metoposaurid in North America (Carnian of Texas), and Metoposaurus has frequently been utilized as an index taxon of the Otischalkian estimated holochron (‘land vertebrate faunachron’) and for biostratigraphic correlations with other geographic regions. The taxonomy of this species is therefore relevant for both taxonomic experts and biostratigraphers. Here we redescribe all material from the type locality of “ M .” bakeri , the Elkins Place bone bed, and perform a phylogenetic analysis using a revised matrix assembled from several previous studies. Anatomical comparisons and phylogenetic analyses do not support placement in either Metoposaurus , a taxon otherwise only found in Europe, or Anaschisma , the only other large-bodied taxon from North America. Therefore, we erect a new genus, Buettnererpeton gen. nov., to accommodate this species. Metoposaurus is consequently absent from North America, and this genus cannot be used in global biostratigraphy. Phylogenetic analyses provide evidence that the phylogeny of the Metoposauridae remains extremely labile, with drastic differences in topological resolution and structure being linked to just a handful of characters and scores. Metoposaurids’ morphological conservatism and the increased recognition of intraspecific variation thus continue to be major confounds to elucidating the evolutionary history of this clade.more » « less
-
Pelycosaur-grade synapsids comprise the first major radiation of Synapsida, and their phylogenetic relationships have been the subject of over three decades of research in a cladistic framework. In this time three major “lineages” of shared character-taxon matrices have been created, each with distinct sets of characters and taxa which have been analyzed using different tree-construction methods. The majority of papers analyzing “pelycosaur” phylogeny belong to one of these research lineages. Papers rarely cross over to another lineage, but occasionally borrow a few characters from other research lineages. This bias in the sources of “pelycosaur” phylogenetic datasets means that there have been fewer truly independent tests of hypothesized relationships within the group than the number of published analyses would suggest, and that our understanding of “pelycosaur” phylogeny may be less certain than is sometimes portrayed. Here, we use a novel method to create a “pelycosaur” metatree to summarize our current understanding of the group's phylogeny. We also perform a bipartite network analysis to describe relationships between individual datasets and to characterize distinct research lineages. The topology of our metatree shows the most similarity to the results of the largest research lineage, reflecting the large contribution those papers made to the underlying dataset. We recover a monophyletic Caseasauria and Eupelycosauria. Relationships within eupelycosaur subclades also generally match previous hypotheses from the largest lineage. However, within Caseasauria, a monophyletic Eothyrididae falls within Caseidae, reflecting the influence of multiple dataset lineages on recent work on the group. The bipartite network analysis confirms the division of datasets into three main lineages. Moreover, the matrices in the older lineages are more conservative, with fewer character additions or deletions, whereas those in the newest lineage are more variable. Our results reveal how scientific practice has influenced our understanding of “pelycosaur” phylogeny, and suggest that the construction of additional, independent datasets will be an important step in further testing conventional wisdom and traditional phylogenetic hypotheses.more » « less
-
Edwards, Danielle (Ed.)Abstract Phylogenetic analyses may suffer from multiple sources of error leading to conflict between genes and methods of inference. The evolutionary history of the mollusc clade Vetigastropoda makes them susceptible to these conflicts, their higher level phylogeny remaining largely unresolved. Originating over 350 Ma, vetigastropods were the dominant marine snails in the Paleozoic. Multiple extinction events and new radiations have resulted in both very long and very short branches and a large extant diversity of over 4000 species. This is the perfect setting of a hard phylogenetic question in which sources of conflict can be explored. We present 41 new transcriptomes across the diversity of vetigastropods (62 terminals total), and provide the first genomic-scale phylogeny for the group. We find that deep divergences differ from previous studies in which long branch attraction was likely pervasive. Robust results leading to changes in taxonomy include the paraphyly of the order Lepetellida and the family Tegulidae. Tectinae subfam. nov. is designated for the clade comprising Tectus, Cittarium, and Rochia. For two early divergences, topologies disagreed between concatenated analyses using site heterogeneous models versus concatenated partitioned analyses and summary coalescent methods. We investigated rate and composition heterogeneity among genes, as well as missing data by locus and by taxon, none of which had an impact on the inferred topologies. We also found no evidence for ancient introgression throughout the phylogeny. We further tested whether uninformative genes and over-partitioning were responsible for this discordance by evaluating the phylogenetic signal of individual genes using likelihood mapping, and by analyzing the most informative genes with a full multispecies coalescent (MSC) model. We find that most genes are not informative at the two conflicting nodes, but neither this nor gene-wise partitioning are the cause of discordant results. New method implementations that simultaneously integrate amino acid profile mixture models and the MSC might be necessary to resolve these and other recalcitrant nodes in the Tree of Life.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

