- Award ID(s):
- 1713072
- PAR ID:
- 10410899
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Cryosphere
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 1994-0424
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1931 to 1953
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract. Accurate modeling of cryospheric surface albedo is essential for ourunderstanding of climate change as snow and ice surfaces regulate the globalradiative budget and sea-level through their albedo and massbalance. Although significant progress has been made using physicalprinciples to represent the dynamic albedo of snow, models of glacier icealbedo tend to be heavily parameterized and not explicitly connected withphysical properties that govern albedo, such as the number and size of airbubbles, specific surface area (SSA), presence of abiotic and biotic lightabsorbing constituents (LACs), and characteristics of any overlyingsnow. Here, we introduce SNICAR-ADv4, an extension of the multi-layertwo-stream delta-Eddington radiative transfer model with theadding–doubling solver that has been previously applied to represent snowand sea-ice spectral albedo. SNICAR-ADv4 treats spectrally resolved Fresnelreflectance and transmittance between overlying snow and higher-densityglacier ice, scattering by air bubbles of varying sizes, and numerous typesof LACs. SNICAR-ADv4 simulates a wide range of clean snow and ice broadbandalbedo (BBA), ranging from 0.88 for (30 µm) fine-grain snow to 0.03for bare and bubble-free ice under direct light. Our results indicate thatrepresenting ice with a density of 650 kg m−3 as snow with norefractive Fresnel layer, as done previously, generally overestimates theBBA by an average of 0.058. However, because mostnaturally occurring ice surfaces are roughened “white ice”, we recommendmodeling a thin snow layer over bare ice simulations. We find optimalagreement with measurements by representing cryospheric media with densitiesless than 650 kg m−3 as snow and larger-density media as bubbly icewith a Fresnel layer. SNICAR-ADv4 also simulates the non-linear albedoimpacts from LACs with changing ice SSA, with peak impact per unit mass ofLACs near SSAs of 0.1–0.01 m2 kg−1. For bare, bubble-free ice, LACsactually increase the albedo. SNICAR-ADv4 represents smooth transitionsbetween snow, firn, and ice surfaces and accurately reproduces measuredspectral albedos of a variety of glacier surfaces. This work paves the wayfor adapting SNICAR-ADv4 to be used in land ice model components of Earthsystem models.more » « less
-
Abstract. Surface mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) hasaccelerated over the past decades, mainly due to enhanced surface meltingand liquid water runoff in response to atmospheric warming. A large portionof runoff from the GrIS originates from exposure of the darker bare ice inthe ablation zone when the overlying snow melts, where surface albedo playsa critical role in modulating the energy available for melting. In thisregard, it is imperative to understand the processes governing albedovariability to accurately project future mass loss from the GrIS. Bare-icealbedo is spatially and temporally variable and contingent on non-linearfeedbacks and the presence of light-absorbing constituents. An assessment ofmodels aiming at simulating albedo variability and associated impacts onmeltwater production is crucial for improving our understanding of theprocesses governing these feedbacks and, in turn, surface mass loss fromGreenland. Here, we report the results of a comparison of the bare-iceextent and albedo simulated by the regional climate model ModèleAtmosphérique Régional (MAR) with satellite imagery from theModerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) for the GrIS below70∘ N. Our findings suggest that MAR overestimates bare-ice albedoby 22.8 % on average in this area during the 2000–2021 period with respectto the estimates obtained from MODIS. Using an energy balance model toparameterize meltwater production, we find this bare-ice albedo bias canlead to an underestimation of total meltwater production from the bare-icezone below 70∘ N of 42.8 % during the summers of 2000–2021.more » « less
-
Abstract Snow depth on sea ice is an Essential Climate Variable and a major source of uncertainty in satellite altimetry‐derived sea ice thickness. During winter of the MOSAiC Expedition, the “KuKa” dual‐frequency, fully polarized Ku‐ and Ka‐band radar was deployed in “stare” nadir‐looking mode to investigate the possibility of combining these two frequencies to retrieve snow depth. Three approaches were investigated: dual‐frequency, dual‐polarization and waveform shape, and compared to independent snow depth measurements. Novel dual‐polarization approaches yielded
r 2values up to 0.77. Mean snow depths agreed within 1 cm, even for data sub‐banded to CryoSat‐2 SIRAL and SARAL AltiKa bandwidths. Snow depths from co‐polarized dual‐frequency approaches were at least a factor of four too small and had ar 20.15 or lower.r 2for waveform shape techniques reached 0.72 but depths were underestimated. Snow depth retrievals using polarimetric information or waveform shape may therefore be possible from airborne/satellite radar altimeters. -
The treatment of surface melt, runoff, and the snow-firn-ice transition in ice-sheet models (ISMs) is becoming increasingly important, as mobile liquid on Greenland and Antarctic flanks increases due to climate warming in the next century and beyond. Simple Positive Degree Day (PDD)-based box models used in some ISMs crudely capture liquid storage and refreezing, but need to be extended to include vertical structure through the whole firn-ice column, as in some regional climate models (RCMs). This is a necessary prelude to modeling the flow of mobile meltwater in channel-river-moulin systems, and routing to the base and/or margins of the ice sheet. More detailed column models of snow and firn exist, that include compaction, grain size, and other processes. Some focus on dry-snow zones, and have fine vertical resolution spanning the entire firn column with Lagrangian tracking of annual snow layers (e.g., FirnMICE: Lundin et al., J. Glac., 2017). However, they are mostly too computationally expensive for ISM applications, and are not designed for ablation zones with meltwater and bare ice in summer. More general models are used in some RCMs that include similar physics but with fewer layers, and are applicable both to accumulation and ablation zones. Here we formulate a new snow-firn model, similar to those in RCMs, for use within an ice-sheet model. A limited number of vertical layers is used (∼10), with Lagrangian tracking of layers, grain size evolution, compaction, ice lenses, liquid melting, storage, percolation and runoff. Surface melting is computed from linearized net atmospheric energy fluxes, not from PDDs. The model is tested using the FirnMICE experiments, and using gridded RACMO2 modern climate input over Greenland, seeking to balance model performance with computational efficiency.more » « less
-
Melt ponds on sea ice play an important role in the Arctic climate system. Their presence alters the partitioning of solar radiation: decreasing reflection, increasing absorption and transmission to the ice and ocean, and enhancing melt. The spatiotemporal properties of melt ponds thus modify ice albedo feedbacks and the mass balance of Arctic sea ice. The Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition presented a valuable opportunity to investigate the seasonal evolution of melt ponds through a rich array of atmosphere-ice-ocean measurements across spatial and temporal scales. In this study, we characterize the seasonal behavior and variability in the snow, surface scattering layer, and melt ponds from spring melt to autumn freeze-up using in situ surveys and auxiliary observations. We compare the results to satellite retrievals and output from two models: the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) and the Marginal Ice Zone Modeling and Assimilation System (MIZMAS). During the melt season, the maximum pond coverage and depth were 21% and 22 ± 13 cm, respectively, with distribution and depth corresponding to surface roughness and ice thickness. Compared to observations, both models overestimate melt pond coverage in summer, with maximum values of approximately 41% (MIZMAS) and 51% (CESM2). This overestimation has important implications for accurately simulating albedo feedbacks. During the observed freeze-up, weather events, including rain on snow, caused high-frequency variability in snow depth, while pond coverage and depth remained relatively constant until continuous freezing ensued. Both models accurately simulate the abrupt cessation of melt ponds during freeze-up, but the dates of freeze-up differ. MIZMAS accurately simulates the observed date of freeze-up, while CESM2 simulates freeze-up one-to-two weeks earlier. This work demonstrates areas that warrant future observation-model synthesis for improving the representation of sea-ice processes and properties, which can aid accurate simulations of albedo feedbacks in a warming climate.more » « less