More Like this

1. When Is a Helix Stable?

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.088001  

   Borum, Andy; Bretl, Timothy (August 2020, Physical Review Letters)

   null (Ed.)
2. When does a stream become a river?

   https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4185  

   Czuba, Jonathan_A; Allen, George_H (July 2023, River Research and Applications)

   Abstract The distinction between a “stream” and “river” is imprecise and vague despite the popular usage of the terms across disciplines for describing flowing waterbodies. Based on an analysis of named flowing waterbodies in the continental United States, we suggest a bank‐to‐bank channel width of 15 m as a working threshold in defining smaller “streams” from larger “rivers.” 

   more » « less
3. When Two Cameras Are a Crowd

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3588998  

   Lee, Jongho; Gupta, Mohit; Krishnaswamy, Bhuvana; Banerjee, Suman (December 2023, Communications of the ACM)

   Understanding and handling interference across multiple active cameras. 

   more » « less
4. Misconception of Abstraction: When to Use an Example and When to Use a Variable?

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3501709.3544276  

   Du, Hanxiang; Xing, Wanli; Zhang, Yuanlin (August 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research)
5. When will a changing climate outpace adaptive evolution?

   https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.852  

   Martin, Ryan A.; da Silva, Carmen R. B.; Moore, Michael P.; Diamond, Sarah E. (June 2023, WIREs Climate Change)

   Abstract Decades of research have illuminated the underlying ingredients that determine the scope of evolutionary responses to climate change. The field of evolutionary biology therefore stands ready to take what it has learned about influences upon the rate of adaptive evolution—such as population demography, generation time, and standing genetic variation—and apply it to assess if and how populations can evolve fast enough to “keep pace” with climate change. Here, our review highlights what the field of evolutionary biology can contribute and what it still needs to learn to provide more mechanistic predictions of the winners and losers of climate change. We begin by developing broad predictions for contemporary evolution to climate change based on theory. We then discuss methods for assessing climate‐driven contemporary evolution, including quantitative genetic studies, experimental evolution, and space‐for‐time substitutions. After providing this mechanism‐focused overview of both the evidence for evolutionary responses to climate change and more specifically, evolving to keep pace with climate change, we next consider the factors that limit actual evolutionary responses. In this context, we consider the dual role of phenotypic plasticity in facilitating but also impeding evolutionary change. Finally, we detail how a deeper consideration of evolutionary constraints can improve forecasts of responses to climate change and therefore also inform conservation and management decisions. This article is categorized under:Climate, Ecology, and Conservation > Observed Ecological ChangesClimate, Ecology, and Conservation > Extinction RiskAssessing Impacts of Climate Change > Evaluating Future Impacts of Climate Change 

   more » « less