An official website of the United States government
We study model-free reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for infinite-horizon average-reward Markov decision process (MDP), which is more appropriate for applications that involve continuing operations not divided into episodes. In contrast to episodic/discounted MDPs, theoretical understanding of model-free RL algorithms is relatively inadequate for the average-reward setting. In this paper, we consider both the online setting and the setting with access to a simulator. We develop computationally efficient model-free algorithms that achieve sharper guarantees on regret/sample complexity compared with existing results. In the online setting, we design an algorithm, UCB-AVG, based on an optimistic variant of variance-reduced Q-learning. We show that UCB-AVG achieves a regret bound $$\widetilde{O}(S^5A^2sp(h^*)\sqrt{T})$$ after $$T$$ steps, where $$S\times A$$ is the size of state-action space, and $sp(h^*)$ the span of the optimal bias function. Our result provides the first computationally efficient model-free algorithm that achieves the optimal dependence in $$T$$ (up to log factors) for weakly communicating MDPs, which is necessary for low regret. In contrast, prior results either are suboptimal in $$T$$ or require strong assumptions of ergodicity or uniformly mixing of MDPs. In the simulator setting, we adapt the idea of UCB-AVG to develop a model-free algorithm that finds an $$\epsilon$$-optimal policy with sample complexity $$\widetilde{O}(SAsp^2(h^*)\epsilon^{-2} + S^2Asp(h^*)\epsilon^{-1}).$$ This sample complexity is near-optimal for weakly communicating MDPs, in view of the minimax lower bound $$\Omega(SAsp(^*)\epsilon^{-2})$$. Existing work mainly focuses on ergodic MDPs and the results typically depend on $$t_{mix},$$ the worst-case mixing time induced by a policy. We remark that the diameter $$D$$ and mixing time $$t_{mix}$$ are both lower bounded by $sp(h^*)$, and $$t_{mix}$$ can be arbitrarily large for certain MDPs. On the technical side, our approach integrates two key ideas: learning an $$\gamma$$-discounted MDP as an approximation, and leveraging reference-advantage decomposition for variance in optimistic Q-learning. As recognized in prior work, a naive approximation by discounted MDPs results in suboptimal guarantees. A distinguishing feature of our method is maintaining estimates of value-difference between state pairs to provide a sharper bound on the variance of reference advantage. We also crucially use a careful choice of the discounted factor $$\gamma$$ to balance approximation error due to discounting and the statistical learning error, and we are able to maintain a good-quality reference value function with $O(SA)$ space complexity.
more »
« less
Instance-Dependent Near-Optimal Policy Identification in Linear MDPs via Online Experiment Design
While much progress has been made in understanding the minimax sample complexity of reinforcement learning (RL)—the complexity of learning on the “worst-case” instance—such measures of complexity often do not capture the true difficulty of learning. In practice, on an “easy” instance, we might hope to achieve a complexity far better than that achievable on the worst-case instance. In this work we seek to understand the “instance-dependent” complexity of learning near-optimal policies (PAC RL) in the setting of RL with linear function approximation. We propose an algorithm, Pedel, which achieves a fine-grained instance-dependent measure of complexity, the first of its kind in the RL with function approximation setting, thereby capturing the difficulty of learning on each particular problem instance. Through an explicit example, we show that Pedel yields provable gains over low-regret, minimax-optimal algorithms and that such algorithms are unable to hit the instance-optimal rate. Our approach relies on a novel online experiment design-based procedure which focuses the exploration budget on the “directions” most relevant to learning a near-optimal policy, and may be of independent interest.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10415286
- Editor(s):
- Koyejo, S.; Mohamed, S.; Agarwal, A.; Belgrave, D.; Cho, K.; Oh, A.
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Advances in neural information processing systems
- ISSN:
- 1049-5258
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The practicality of reinforcement learning algorithms has been limited due to poor scaling with respect to the problem size, as the sample complexity of learning an ε-optimal policy is Ω(|S||A|H/ ε2) over worst case instances of an MDP with state space S, action space A, and horizon H. We consider a class of MDPs for which the associated optimal Q* function is low rank, where the latent features are unknown. While one would hope to achieve linear sample complexity in |S| and |A| due to the low rank structure, we show that without imposing further assumptions beyond low rank of Q*, if one is constrained to estimate the Q function using only observations from a subset of entries, there is a worst case instance in which one must incur a sample complexity exponential in the horizon H to learn a near optimal policy. We subsequently show that under stronger low rank structural assumptions, given access to a generative model, Low Rank Monte Carlo Policy Iteration (LR-MCPI) and Low Rank Empirical Value Iteration (LR-EVI) achieve the desired sample complexity of Õ((|S|+|A|)poly (d,H)/ε2) for a rank d setting, which is minimax optimal with respect to the scaling of |S|, |A|, and ε. In contrast to literature on linear and low-rank MDPs, we do not require a known feature mapping, our algorithm is computationally simple, and our results hold for long time horizons. Our results provide insights on the minimal low-rank structural assumptions required on the MDP with respect to the transition kernel versus the optimal action-value function.more » « less
-
Goal-oriented Reinforcement Learning, where the agent needs to reach the goal state while simultaneously minimizing the cost, has received significant attention in real-world applications. Its theoretical formulation, stochastic shortest path (SSP), has been intensively researched in the online setting. Nevertheless, it remains understudied when such an online interaction is prohibited and only historical data is provided. In this paper, we consider the offline stochastic shortest path problem when the state space and the action space are finite. We design the simple value iteration-based algorithms for tackling both offline policy evaluation (OPE) and offline policy learning tasks. Notably, our analysis of these simple algorithms yields strong instance-dependent bounds which can imply worst-case bounds that are near-minimax optimal. We hope our study could help illuminate the fundamental statistical limits of the offline SSP problem and motivate further studies beyond the scope of current consideration.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Model-based reinforcement learning (RL), which finds an optimal policy using an empirical model, has long been recognized as one of the cornerstones of RL. It is especially suitable for multi-agent RL (MARL), as it naturally decouples the learning and the planning phases, and avoids the non-stationarity problem when all agents are improving their policies simultaneously using samples. Though intuitive and widely-used, the sample complexity of model-based MARL algorithms has been investigated relatively much less often. In this paper, we aim to address the fundamental open question about the sample complexity of model-based MARL. We study arguably the most basic MARL setting: two-player discounted zero-sum Markov games, given only access to a generative model of state transition. We show that model-based MARL achieves a near optimal sample complexity for finding the Nash equilibrium (NE) \emph{value} up to some additive error. We also show that this method is near-minimax optimal with a tight dependence on the horizon and the number of states. Our results justify the efficiency of this simple model-based approach in the multi-agent RL setting.more » « less
-
Recent studies in reinforcement learning (RL) have made significant progress by leveraging function approximation to alleviate the sample complexity hurdle for better performance. Despite the success, existing provably efficient algorithms typically rely on the accessibility of immediate feedback upon taking actions. The failure to account for the impact of delay in observations can significantly degrade the performance of real-world systems due to the regret blow-up. In this work, we tackle the challenge of delayed feedback in RL with linear function approximation by employing posterior sampling, which has been shown to empirically outperform the popular UCB algorithms in a wide range of regimes. We first introduce Delayed-PSVI, an optimistic value-based algorithm that effectively explores the value function space via noise perturbation with posterior sampling. We provide the first analysis for posterior sampling algorithms with delayed feedback in RL and show our algorithm achieves $$\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{d^3H^3 T} + d^2H^2 E[\tau])$$ worst-case regret in the presence of unknown stochastic delays. Here $$E[\tau]$$ is the expected delay. To further improve its computational efficiency and to expand its applicability in high-dimensional RL problems, we incorporate a gradient-based approximate sampling scheme via Langevin dynamics for Delayed-LPSVI, which maintains the same order-optimal regret guarantee with $$\widetilde{O}(dHK)$$ computational cost. Empirical evaluations are performed to demonstrate the statistical and computational efficacy of our algorithms.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- The DOI is not currently available.
