More Like this

1. Choosing exogeneity assumptions in potential outcome models

   https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utad005  

   Masten, Matthew A; Poirier, Alexandre (September 2023, The Econometrics Journal)

   There are many kinds of exogeneity assumptions. How should researchers choose among them? When exogeneity is imposed on an unobservable like a potential outcome, we argue that the form of exogeneity should be chosen based on the kind of selection on unobservables it allows. Consequently, researchers can assess the plausibility of any exogeneity assumption by studying the distributions of treatment given the unobservables that are consistent with that assumption. We use this approach to study two common exogeneity assumptions: quantile and mean independence. We show that both assumptions require a kind of nonmonotonic relationship between treatment and the potential outcomes. We discuss how to assess the plausibility of this kind of treatment selection. We also show how to define a new and weaker version of quantile independence that allows for monotonic selection on unobservables. We then show the implications of the choice of exogeneity assumption for identification. We apply these results in an empirical illustration of the effect of child soldiering on wages. 

   more » « less
2. Partial Identifiability in Discrete Data with Measurement Error

   Noam Finkelstein; Roy Adams; Suchi Saria; Ilya Shpitser (July 2021, Proceedings of the Thirty Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence)

   Cassio de Campos; Marloes H. Maathuis (Ed.)

   When data contains measurement errors, it is necessary to make modeling assumptions relating the error-prone measurements to the unobserved true values. Work on measurement error has largely focused on models that fully identify the parameter of interest. As a result, many practically useful models that result in bounds on the target parameter -- known as partial identification -- have been neglected. In this work, we present a method for partial identification in a class of measurement error models involving discrete variables. We focus on models that impose linear constraints on the tar- get parameter, allowing us to compute partial identification bounds using off-the-shelf LP solvers. We show how several common measurement error assumptions can be composed with an extended class of instrumental variable-type models to create such linear constraint sets. We further show how this approach can be used to bound causal parameters, such as the average treatment effect, when treatment or outcome variables are measured with error. Using data from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment, we apply this method to estimate bounds on the effect Medicaid enrollment has on depression when depression is measured with error. 

   more » « less
3. Sensemakr: Sensitivity Analysis Tools for OLS in R and Stata

   https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2024.a946583  

   Cinelli, Carlos; Ferwerda, Jeremy; Hazlett, Chad (December 2024, Observational Studies)

   This tutorial introduces the package sensemakr for R and Stata, which implements a suite of sensitivity analysis tools for regression models developed in Cinelli and Hazlett (2020, 2022). Given a regression model, sensemakr can compute sensitivity statistics for routine reporting, such as the robustness value , which describes the minimum strength that unobserved confounders need to have to overturn a research conclusion. The package also provides plotting tools that visually demonstrate the sensitivity of point estimates and t-values to hypothetical confounders. Finally, sensemakr implements formal bounds on sensitivity parameters by means of comparison with the explanatory power of observed variables. All these tools are based on the familiar omitted variable bias framework, do not require assumptions regarding the functional form of the treatment assignment mechanism nor the distribution of the unobserved confounders, and naturally handle multiple, non-linear confounders. With sensemakr, users can transparently report the sensitivity of their causal inferences to unobserved confounding, thereby enabling a more precise, quantitative debate as to what can be concluded from imperfect observational studies. 

   more » « less
4. Validating a data-driven framework for vehicular traffic modeling

   https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/ad3ed6  

   Lane, Daniel; Roy, Subhradeep (May 2024, Journal of Physics: Complexity)

   Abstract This study presents a data-driven framework for modeling complex systems, with a specific emphasis on traffic modeling. Traditional methods in traffic modeling often rely on assumptions regarding vehicle interactions. Our approach comprises two steps: first, utilizing information- theoretic (IT) tools to identify interaction directions and candidate variables thus eliminating assumptions, and second, employing the sparse identification of nonlinear systems (SINDy) tool to establish functional relationships. We validate the framework’s efficacy using synthetic data from two distinct traffic models, while considering measurement noise. Results show that IT tools can reliably detect directions of interaction as well as instances of no interaction. SINDy proves instrumental in creating precise functional relationships and determining coefficients in tested models. The innovation of our framework lies in its ability to use data-driven approach to model traffic dynamics without relying on assumptions, thus offering applications in various complex systems beyond traffic. 

   more » « less
5. Identification of Nonlinear Latent Hierarchical Models

   Kong, Lingjing; Huang, Biwei; Xie, Feng; Xing, Eric; Chi, Yuejie; Zhang, Kun (December 2023, Advances in neural information processing systems)

   Identifying latent variables and causal structures from observational data is essential to many real-world applications involving biological data, medical data, and unstructured data such as images and languages. However, this task can be highly challenging, especially when observed variables are generated by causally related latent variables and the relationships are nonlinear. In this work, we investigate the identification problem for nonlinear latent hierarchical causal models in which observed variables are generated by a set of causally related latent variables, and some latent variables may not have observed children. We show that the identifiability of causal structures and latent variables (up to invertible transformations) can be achieved under mild assumptions: on causal structures, we allow for multiple paths between any pair of variables in the graph, which relaxes latent tree assumptions in prior work; on structural functions, we permit general nonlinearity and multi-dimensional continuous variables, alleviating existing work's parametric assumptions. Specifically, we first develop an identification criterion in the form of novel identifiability guarantees for an elementary latent variable model. Leveraging this criterion, we show that both causal structures and latent variables of the hierarchical model can be identified asymptotically by explicitly constructing an estimation procedure. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to establish identifiability guarantees for both causal structures and latent variables in nonlinear latent hierarchical models. 

   more » « less