The state of California is the foremost leader in solar photovoltaics (PV) installations in the United States. With 1,390,240 installations and 24.76% of the state's energy coming from solar, the demand for PV modules is steadily increasing. Most PV modules have an expected lifetime of 25-30 years. However, due to repowering or early module failure, module lifetime can often be shorter than anticipated. Current studies calculate the environmental impact of PV systems based on ideal installation conditions and a full 25-year module lifetime. This study considers the impact on the life cycle of PV systems from early PV module retirement and actual system installation in California. Using the life cycle cumulative energy demand, electricity data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and greenhouse gases, carbon payback time (CPBT) was evaluated. Data from various PV module rooftop residential installations in 2019 were collected from the California NEM database. Information on the system design (tilt, azimuth, module model) and module specification sheets were used to calculate the cumulative electricity generated in kilowatt-hours (kWh) over the system' lifetime. The calculated average CPBT was 2.8 years, shorter than most of the system lifetimes, and the mean number of zero carbon years experienced by earlier retired systems was about 5 years. Although the rapid movement towards solar energy is promising and essential as reliance on greener energy increases, attention must be paid to the diverse lifespans of PV modules, system design, and performance to substantiate or reject the assumption that PV always have a positive impact on the environment.
more »
« less
On the economics of rooftop solar PV adoption
Much has been written on the rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) adoption in the U.S., but granular economic assessment at large scale is missing. We provide household level PV economic assessment for a medium size city in North Central Florida, and analyze the economic viability of these installations. Results show that a large number of households will not benefit from solar installations. Further, economic viability is heavily reliant on incentives whose future is uncertain at best. Our analysis did not reveal significant variations in economic viability across different household values --- a proxy we used to differentiate household wealth. Yet, building permits and installation locations indicate economically disadvantaged communities have much lower installation rates as has been the main conclusion in the earlier literature. We argue economic assessment for PV should extend beyond simple benefit--cost analysis. A more nuanced approach should be taken in PV feasibility assessment, and structuring incentive schemes.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2122313
- PAR ID:
- 10416346
- Publisher / Repository:
- Energy Policy
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Energy Policy
- Volume:
- 178
- Issue:
- C
- ISSN:
- 0301-4215
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 113611
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
This work presents a decision making approach for selecting an optimal placement of the grid-connected solar generation using Geographical Information System (GIS) as the decision making tool. A terrain analysis for solar radiation assessment, as well as buildings and vegetation spatial data are analyzed in order to determine the shadow impact that can be anticipated for medium or large-scale PV installation. In addition, different historical weather conditions are considered and integrated into the model to show the impact of this variable on the solar generation output. Some details of the methodology, testbed development and results related to the selection of potential sites for PV installation are presented. To illustrate the process and proposed methodology, an example using large scale synthetic networks is implemented.more » « less
-
As an alternative, cleaner energy source, solar power is becoming a much bigger player in how electricity is generated and consumed. To assess how economically-viable solar power is in comparison to other forms of electricity, factors such as the return on investment (ROI) can be calculated. In addition, based on the average lifetime of an average photovoltaic (PV) system, energy purchase reduction, and revenue that can be generated by selling excess electricity back to the power grid, the economic viability of solar energy can be determined. The capital and commissioning cost of a PV system will continue to be a major factor in how viable a PV system will be. Thus, observing the trend in PV system costs over the past years will yield a point of grid parity, when solar becomes competitive with existing forms of energy generation, and show the most beneficial time frame for the customer to install the PV system. This paper seeks to provide some insight on how economic using solar energy can be.more » « less
-
Solar energy has the potential to offset a significant fraction of non-renewable electricity demands globally, yet it may occupy extensive areas when deployed at this level. There is growing concern that large renewable energy installations will displace other land uses. Where should future solar power installations be placed to achieve the highest energy production and best use the limited land resource? The premise of this work is that the solar panel efficiency is a function of the location’s microclimate within which it is immersed. Current studies largely ignore many of the environmental factors that influence Photovoltaic (PV) panel function. A model for solar panel efficiency that incorporates the influence of the panel’s microclimate was derived from first principles and validated with field observations. Results confirm that the PV panel efficiency is influenced by the insolation, air temperature, wind speed and relative humidity. The model was applied globally using bias-corrected reanalysis datasets to map solar panel efficiency and the potential for solar power production given local conditions. Solar power production potential was classified based on local land cover classification, with croplands having the greatest median solar potential of approximately 28 W/m2. The potential for dual-use, agrivoltaic systems may alleviate land competition or other spatial constraints for solar power development, creating a significant opportunity for future energy sustainability. Global energy demand would be offset by solar production if even less than 1% of cropland were converted to an agrivoltaic system.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract Solar energy has the potential to offset a significant fraction of non-renewable electricity demands globally, yet it may occupy extensive areas when deployed at this level. There is growing concern that large renewable energy installations will displace other land uses. Where should future solar power installations be placed to achieve the highest energy production and best use the limited land resource? The premise of this work is that the solar panel efficiency is a function of the location’s microclimate within which it is immersed. Current studies largely ignore many of the environmental factors that influence Photovoltaic (PV) panel function. A model for solar panel efficiency that incorporates the influence of the panel’s microclimate was derived from first principles and validated with field observations. Results confirm that the PV panel efficiency is influenced by the insolation, air temperature, wind speed and relative humidity. The model was applied globally using bias-corrected reanalysis datasets to map solar panel efficiency and the potential for solar power production given local conditions. Solar power production potential was classified based on local land cover classification, with croplands having the greatest median solar potential of approximately 28 W/m2. The potential for dual-use, agrivoltaic systems may alleviate land competition or other spatial constraints for solar power development, creating a significant opportunity for future energy sustainability. Global energy demand would be offset by solar production if even less than 1% of cropland were converted to an agrivoltaic system.
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113611
