Simulations from a regional ocean and sea ice model are presented to analyze the potential impacts of climate change on dimethylsulfide (DMS) ocean concentrations and emissions in the Arctic Ocean during the 21st century for a scenario of strong warming (RCP8.5, 2016–2085). The model used includes sulfur biogeochemistry in both the ocean and sea ice, representing the production of dimethylsulfoniopropionate and its conversion to DMS. Simulated DMS concentrations and emissions increase overall in the future throughout the Arctic. Substantial increases of summer ocean surface DMS concentrations and emissions are projected in the shallow continental shelves of the Eastern Arctic, due to a large reduction of sea ice cover. In the Central and Western Arctic, moderate increases of spring DMS production are trapped below sea ice even in the late 21st century. In deep basins, despite ice-free summers in the future, simulated DMS emissions are low, as DMS production occurs mostly below the mixed layer and remains at depth. The strong temporal variability of near-surface winds results in bursts of DMS emissions lasting a few days, with sea-to-air fluxes up to 10 times higher than the monthly median emissions rate. These spikes of DMS emissions occur throughout the Arctic, indicating an episodic impact of DMS on climate in areas of low mean DMS emissions. The simulated frequency of high-flux events increases during the 21st century in both spring and summer in almost all regions of the Arctic. However, the model is not capable of representing rapid out-gassing events during sea ice break-up, and improvements in the representation of leads are still necessary to fully assess the role of sea ice DMS production. With the ongoing decrease in anthropogenic sulfur emissions, these results suggest a future amplification of the role of DMS in aerosol and cloud formation in the Arctic.
more »
« less
Arctic Sea Ice Loss Weakens Northern Hemisphere Summertime Storminess but Not Until the Late 21st Century
Abstract Observations show Arctic sea ice has declined and midlatitude storminess has weakened during Northern Hemisphere (NH) summertime. It is currently unclear whether Arctic sea ice loss impacts summertime storminess because most previous work focuses on other seasons. Here we quantify the impact of Arctic sea ice loss on NH summertime storminess using equilibrium and transient climate model simulations. The equilibrium simulations show mid‐to‐late 21st century Arctic sea ice loss weakens summertime storminess, but only in the presence of ocean coupling. With ocean coupling, the equator‐to‐pole temperature and atmospheric energy gradients significantly weaken due to increased surface turbulent flux in the polar region following Arctic sea ice loss. The transient simulations show Arctic sea ice loss does not significantly weaken summertime storminess until the late 21st century. Furthermore, Arctic Amplification, which is dominated by Arctic sea ice loss in the present day, does not significantly impact the present‐day weakening of summertime storminess.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10419865
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 9
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Reanalysis data show a significant weakening of summertime circulation in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) midlatitudes in the satellite era with implications for surface weather extremes. Recent work showed the weakening is not significantly affected by changes in the Arctic, but did not examine the role of different anthropogenic forcings such as aerosols. Here we use the Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP) simulations to quantify the impact of anthropogenic aerosol and greenhouse gas forcing. The DAMIP simulations show aerosols and greenhouse gases contribute equally to zonal‐mean circulation weakening. Regionally, aerosol dominates the Pacific storm track weakening whereas greenhouse gas dominates in the Atlantic. Using a regional energetic framework, we show why the impact of aerosol is the largest in the Pacific. Reduced sulfate aerosol emissions over Eurasia and North America increase (clear‐sky) surface shortwave radiation and turbulent fluxes. This enhances land‐to‐ocean energy contrast and energy transport via stationary circulations to the ocean. Consequently, energy converges poleward of oceanic storm tracks, demanding weaker poleward energy transport storm tracks, and the storm tracks weaken. The impact is larger over the Pacific following the larger emission decrease over Eurasia than North America. Similar yet opposite, increased aerosol emissions over South and East Asia decrease shortwave radiation and weaken land‐to‐ocean energy transport. This diverges energy equatorward of the Pacific storm track, further weakening it. Our results show aerosols are a dominant driver of regional circulation weakening during the NH summertime in the satellite era and a regional energetic framework explaining the underlying processes.more » « less
-
Abstract This study investigates the stratospheric response to Arctic sea ice loss and subsequent near-surface impacts by analyzing 200-member coupled experiments using the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model version 6 (WACCM6) with preindustrial, present-day, and future sea ice conditions specified following the protocol of the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project. The stratospheric polar vortex weakens significantly in response to the prescribed sea ice loss, with a larger response to greater ice loss (i.e., future minus preindustrial) than to smaller ice loss (i.e., future minus present-day). Following the weakening of the stratospheric circulation in early boreal winter, the coupled stratosphere–troposphere response to ice loss strengthens in late winter and early spring, projecting onto a negative North Atlantic Oscillation–like pattern in the lower troposphere. To investigate whether the stratospheric response to sea ice loss and subsequent surface impacts depend on the background oceanic state, ensemble members are initialized by a combination of varying phases of Atlantic multidecadal variability (AMV) and interdecadal Pacific variability (IPV). Different AMV and IPV states combined, indeed, can modulate the stratosphere–troposphere responses to sea ice loss, particularly in the North Atlantic sector. Similar experiments with another climate model show that, although strong sea ice forcing also leads to tighter stratosphere–troposphere coupling than weak sea ice forcing, the timing of the response differs from that in WACCM6. Our findings suggest that Arctic sea ice loss can affect the stratospheric circulation and subsequent tropospheric variability on seasonal time scales, but modulation by the background oceanic state and model dependence need to be taken into account. Significance StatementThis study uses new-generation climate models to better understand the impacts of Arctic sea ice loss on the surface climate in the midlatitudes, including North America, Europe, and Siberia. We focus on the stratosphere–troposphere pathway, which involves the weakening of stratospheric winds and its downward coupling into the troposphere. Our results show that Arctic sea ice loss can affect the surface climate in the midlatitudes via the stratosphere–troposphere pathway, and highlight the modulations from background mean oceanic states as well as model dependence.more » « less
-
Under rising atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, the Arctic exhibits amplified warming relative to the globe. This Arctic amplification is a defining feature of global warming. However, the Arctic is also home to large internal variability, which can make the detection of a forced climate response difficult. Here we use results from seven model large ensembles, which have different rates of Arctic warming and sea ice loss, to assess the time of emergence of anthropogenically-forced Arctic amplification. We find that this time of emergence occurs at the turn of the century in all models, ranging across the models by a decade from 1994–2005. We also assess transient changes in this amplified signal across the 21st century and beyond. Over the 21st century, the projections indicate that the maximum Arctic warming will transition from fall to winter due to sea ice reductions that extend further into the fall. Additionally, the magnitude of the annual amplification signal declines over the 21st century associated in part with a weakening albedo feedback strength. In a simulation that extends to the 23rd century, we find that as sea ice cover is completely lost, there is little further reduction in the surface albedo and Arctic amplification saturates at a level that is reduced from its 21st century value.more » « less
-
Abstract. In the high-latitude Arctic, wintertime sea ice and snowinsulate the relatively warmer ocean from the colder atmosphere. While theclimate warms, wintertime Arctic surface heat fluxes remain dominated by theinsulating effects of snow and sea ice covering the ocean until the sea icethins enough or sea ice concentrations decrease enough to allow for directocean–atmosphere heat fluxes. The Community Earth System Model version 1 LargeEnsemble (CESM1-LE) simulates increases in wintertime conductive heat fluxesin the ice-covered Arctic Ocean by ∼ 7–11 W m−2 bythe mid-21st century, thereby driving an increased warming of theatmosphere. These increased fluxes are due to both thinning sea ice anddecreasing snow on sea ice. The simulations analyzed here use a sub-grid-scaleice thickness distribution. Surface heat flux estimates calculated usinggrid-cell mean values of sea ice thicknesses underestimate mean heat fluxesby ∼16 %–35 % and overestimate changes in conductive heatfluxes by up to ∼36 % in the wintertime Arctic basin evenwhen sea ice concentrations remain above 95 %. These results highlight howwintertime conductive heat fluxes will increase in a warming world evenduring times when sea ice concentrations remain high and that snow and thedistribution of snow significantly impact large-scale calculations ofwintertime surface heat budgets in the Arctic.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
