Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a recently discovered class of RNAs derived from protein-coding genes that have important biological and pathological roles. They are formed through backsplicing during co-transcriptional alternative splicing; however, the unified mechanism that accounts for backsplicing decisions remains unclear. Factors that regulate the transcriptional timing and spatial organization of pre-mRNA, including RNAPII kinetics, the availability of splicing factors, and features of gene architecture, have been shown to influence backsplicing decisions. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase I (PARP1) regulates alternative splicing through both its presence on chromatin as well as its PARylation activity. However, no studies have investigated PARP1’s possible role in regulating circRNA biogenesis. Here, we hypothesized that PARP1’s role in splicing extends to circRNA biogenesis. Our results identify many unique circRNAs in PARP1 depletion and PARylation-inhibited conditions compared to the wild type. We found that while all genes producing circRNAs share gene architecture features common to circRNA host genes, genes producing circRNAs in PARP1 knockdown conditions had longer upstream introns than downstream introns, whereas flanking introns in wild type host genes were symmetrical. Interestingly, we found that the behavior of PARP1 in regulating RNAPII pausing is distinct between these two classes of host genes. We conclude that the PARP1 pausing of RNAPII works within the context of gene architecture to regulate transcriptional kinetics, and therefore circRNA biogenesis. Furthermore, this regulation of PARP1 within host genes acts to fine tune their transcriptional output with implications in gene function.
more »
« less
PARP1′s Involvement in RNA Polymerase II Elongation: Pausing and Releasing Regulation through the Integrator and Super Elongation Complex
RNA polymerase elongation along the gene body is tightly regulated to ensure proper transcription and alternative splicing events. Understanding the mechanism and factors critical in regulating the rate of RNA polymerase II elongation and processivity is clearly important. Recently we showed that PARP1, a well-known DNA repair protein, when bound to chromatin, regulates RNA polymerase II elongation. However, the mechanism by which it does so is not known. In the current study, we aimed to tease out how PARP1 regulates RNAPII elongation. We show, both in vivo and in vitro, that PARP1 binds directly to the Integrator subunit 3 (IntS3), a member of the elongation Integrator complex. The association between the two proteins is mediated via the C-terminal domain of PARP1 to the C-terminal domain of IntS3. Interestingly, the occupancy of IntS3 along two PARP1 target genes mimicked that of PARP1, suggesting a role in its recruitment/assembly of elongation factors. Indeed, the knockdown of PARP1 resulted in differential chromatin association and gene occupancy of IntS3 and other key elongation factors. Most of these PARP1-mediated effects were due to the physical presence of PARP1 rather than its PARylation activity. These studies argue that PARP1 controls the progressive RNAPII elongation complexes. In summary, we present a platform to begin to decipher PARP1′s role in recruiting/scaffolding elongation factors along the gene body regions during RNA polymerase II elongation and gene regulation.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2230470
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10429149
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Cells
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 20
- ISSN:
- 2073-4409
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 3202
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
more » « less
Abstract The Drosophila Boundary Element-Associated Factor of 32 kDa (BEAF) binds in promoter regions of a few thousand mostly housekeeping genes. BEAF is implicated in both chromatin domain boundary activity and promoter function, although molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we show that BEAF physically interacts with the polybromo subunit (Pbro) of PBAP, a SWI/SNF-class chromatin remodeling complex. BEAF also shows genetic interactions with Pbro and other PBAP subunits. We examine the effect of this interaction on gene expression and chromatin structure using precision run-on sequencing and micrococcal nuclease sequencing after RNAi-mediated knockdown in cultured S2 cells. Our results are consistent with the interaction playing a subtle role in gene activation. Fewer than 5% of BEAF-associated genes were significantly affected after BEAF knockdown. Most were downregulated, accompanied by fill-in of the promoter nucleosome-depleted region and a slight upstream shift of the +1 nucleosome. Pbro knockdown caused downregulation of several hundred genes and showed a correlation with BEAF knockdown but a better correlation with promoter-proximal GAGA factor binding. Micrococcal nuclease sequencing supports that BEAF binds near housekeeping gene promoters while Pbro is more important at regulated genes. Yet there is a similar general but slight reduction of promoter-proximal pausing by RNA polymerase II and increase in nucleosome-depleted region nucleosome occupancy after knockdown of either protein. We discuss the possibility of redundant factors keeping BEAF-associated promoters active and masking the role of interactions between BEAF and the Pbro subunit of PBAP in S2 cells. We identify Facilitates Chromatin Transcription (FACT) and Nucleosome Remodeling Factor (NURF) as candidate redundant factors.
-
more » « less
Abstract Poly (ADP)-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1) is an abundant nuclear protein well-known for its role in DNA repair yet also participates in DNA replication, transcription, and co-transcriptional splicing, where DNA is undamaged. Thus, binding to undamaged regions in DNA and RNA is likely a part of PARP1’s normal repertoire. Here we describe analyses of PARP1 binding to two short single-stranded DNAs, a single-stranded RNA, and a double stranded DNA. The investigations involved comparing the wild-type (WT) full-length enzyme with mutants lacking the catalytic domain (∆CAT) or zinc fingers 1 and 2 (∆Zn1∆Zn2). All three protein types exhibited monomeric characteristics in solution and formed saturated 2:1 complexes with single-stranded T20and U20oligonucleotides. These complexes formed without accumulation of 1:1 intermediates, a pattern suggestive of positive binding cooperativity. The retention of binding activities by ∆CAT and ∆Zn1∆Zn2 enzymes suggests that neither the catalytic domain nor zinc fingers 1 and 2 are indispensable for cooperative binding. In contrast, when a double stranded 19mer DNA was tested, WT PARP1 formed a 4:1 complex while the ∆Zn1Zn2 mutant binding saturated at 1:1 stoichiometry. These deviations from the 2:1 pattern observed with T20and U20oligonucleotides show that PARP’s binding mechanism can be influenced by the secondary structure of the nucleic acid. Our studies show that PARP1:nucleic acid interactions are strongly dependent on the nucleic acid type and properties, perhaps reflecting PARP1’s ability to respond differently to different nucleic acid ligands in cells. These findings lay a platform for understanding how the functionally versatile PARP1 recognizes diverse oligonucleotides within the realms of chromatin and RNA biology.
-
more » « less
Abstract The Pcf11 protein is an essential subunit of the large complex that cleaves and polyadenylates eukaryotic mRNA precursor. It has also been functionally linked to gene-looping, termination of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) transcripts, and mRNA export. We have examined a poorly characterized but conserved domain (amino acids 142–225) of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pcf11 and found that while it is not needed for mRNA 3′ end processing or termination downstream of the poly(A) sites of protein-coding genes, its presence improves the interaction with Pol II and the use of transcription terminators near gene promoters. Analysis of genome-wide Pol II occupancy in cells with Pcf11 missing this region, as well as Pcf11 mutated in the Pol II CTD Interacting Domain, indicates that systematic changes in mRNA expression are mediated primarily at the level of transcription. Global expression analysis also shows that a general stress response, involving both activation and suppression of specific gene sets known to be regulated in response to a wide variety of stresses, is induced in the two pcf11 mutants, even though cells are grown in optimal conditions. The mutants also cause an unbalanced expression of cell wall-related genes that does not activate the Cell Wall Integrity pathway but is associated with strong caffeine sensitivity. Based on these findings, we propose that Pcf11 can modulate the expression level of specific functional groups of genes in ways that do not involve its well-characterized role in mRNA 3′ end processing.
-
Abstract Adjusting DNA structure via epigenetic modifications, and altering polyadenylation (pA) sites at which precursor mRNA is cleaved and polyadenylated, allows cells to quickly respond to environmental stress. Since polyadenylation occurs co-transcriptionally, and specific patterns of nucleosome positioning and chromatin modifications correlate with pA site usage, epigenetic factors potentially affect alternative polyadenylation (APA). We report that the histone H3K4 methyltransferase Set1, and the histone H3K36 methyltransferase Set2, control choice of pA site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a powerful model for studying evolutionarily conserved eukaryotic processes. Deletion of SET1 or SET2 causes an increase in serine-2 phosphorylation within the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) and in the recruitment of the cleavage/polyadenylation complex, both of which could cause the observed switch in pA site usage. Chemical inhibition of TOR signaling, which causes nutritional stress, results in Set1- and Set2-dependent APA. In addition, Set1 and Set2 decrease efficiency of using single pA sites, and control nucleosome occupancy around pA sites. Overall, our study suggests that the methyltransferases Set1 and Set2 regulate APA induced by nutritional stress, affect the RNAP II C-terminal domain phosphorylation at Ser2, and control recruitment of the 3′ end processing machinery to the vicinity of pA sites.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11203202
