skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Statistical constraints on climate model parameters using a scalable cloud-based inference framework
Abstract Atmospheric aerosols influence the Earth’s climate, primarily by affecting cloud formation and scattering visible radiation. However, aerosol-related physical processes in climate simulations are highly uncertain. Constraining these processes could help improve model-based climate predictions. We propose a scalable statistical framework for constraining the parameters of expensive climate models by comparing model outputs with observations. Using the C3.AI Suite, a cloud computing platform, we use a perturbed parameter ensemble of the UKESM1 climate model to efficiently train a surrogate model. A method for estimating a data-driven model discrepancy term is described. The strict bounds method is applied to quantify parametric uncertainty in a principled way. We demonstrate the scalability of this framework with 2 weeks’ worth of simulated aerosol optical depth data over the South Atlantic and Central African region, written from the model every 3 hr and matched in time to twice-daily MODIS satellite observations. When constraining the model using real satellite observations, we establish constraints on combinations of two model parameters using much higher time-resolution outputs from the climate model than previous studies. This result suggests that within the limits imposed by an imperfect climate model, potentially very powerful constraints may be achieved when our framework is scaled to the analysis of more observations and for longer time periods.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2053804
PAR ID:
10430515
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Environmental Data Science
Volume:
2
ISSN:
2634-4602
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; (, Remote Sensing)
    null (Ed.)
    Deriving aerosol optical depth (AOD) from space-borne observations is still challenging due to uncertainties associated with sensor calibration drift, cloud screening, aerosol type classification, and surface reflectance characterization. As an initial step to understanding the physical processes impacting these uncertainties in satellite AOD retrievals, this study outlines a theoretical approach to estimate biases in the satellite aerosol retrieval algorithm affected by surface albedo and prescribed aerosol optical properties using a simplified radiative transfer model with a traditional error propagation approach. We expand the critical surface reflectance concept to obtain the critical surface albedo (CSA), critical single scattering albedo (CSSA), and critical asymmetry parameter (CAP). The top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance is not sensitive to significant variability in aerosol loading (AOD) at the critical value; thus, the AOD cannot be determined. Results show that 5% bias in surface albedo (A), single scattering albedo (SSA), or asymmetry parameter (g) lead to large retrieved AOD errors, especially high under conditions when A, SSA, or g are close to their critical values. The results can be useful for future research related to improvements of satellite aerosol retrieval algorithms and provide a preliminary framework to analytically quantify AOD uncertainties from satellite retrievals. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences)
    Abstract The Southern Ocean is covered by a large amount of clouds with high cloud albedo. However, as reported by previous climate model intercomparison projects, underestimated cloudiness and overestimated absorption of solar radiation (ASR) over the Southern Ocean lead to substantial biases in climate sensitivity. The present study revisits this long-standing issue and explores the uncertainty sources in the latest CMIP6 models. We employ 10-year satellite observations to evaluate cloud radiative effect (CRE) and cloud physical properties in five CMIP6 models that provide comprehensive output of cloud, radiation, and aerosol. The simulated longwave, shortwave, and net CRE at the top of atmosphere in CMIP6 are comparable with the CERES satellite observations. Total cloud fraction (CF) is also reasonably simulated in CMIP6, but the comparison of liquid cloud fraction (LCF) reveals marked biases in spatial pattern and seasonal variations. The discrepancies between the CMIP6 models and the MODIS satellite observations become even larger in other cloud macro- and micro-physical properties, including liquid water path (LWP), cloud optical depth (COD), and cloud effective radius, as well as aerosol optical depth (AOD). However, the large underestimation of both LWP and cloud effective radius (regional means ∼20% and 11%, respectively) results in relatively smaller bias in COD, and the impacts of the biases in COD and LCF also cancel out with each other, leaving CRE and ASR reasonably predicted in CMIP6. An error estimation framework is employed, and the different signs of the sensitivity errors and biases from CF and LWP corroborate the notions that there are compensating errors in the modeled shortwave CRE. Further correlation analyses of the geospatial patterns reveal that CF is the most relevant factor in determining CRE in observations, while the modeled CRE is too sensitive to LWP and COD. The relationships between cloud effective radius, LWP, and COD are also analyzed to explore the possible uncertainty sources in different models. Our study calls for more rigorous calibration of detailed cloud physical properties for future climate model development and climate projection. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Earth System Science Data)
    Abstract. Due to its remote location and extreme weather conditions, atmospheric in situmeasurements are rare in the Southern Ocean. As a result, aerosol–cloudinteractions in this region are poorly understood and remain a major source ofuncertainty in climate models. This, in turn, contributes substantially topersistent biases in climate model simulations such as the well-known positiveshortwave radiation bias at the surface, as well as biases in numericalweather prediction models and reanalyses. It has been shown in previousstudies that in situ and ground-based remote sensing measurements across theSouthern Ocean are critical for complementing satellite data sets due to theimportance of boundary layer and low-level cloud processes. These processesare poorly sampled by satellite-based measurements and are often obscured bymultiple overlying cloud layers. Satellite measurements also do not constrainthe aerosol–cloud processes very well with imprecise estimation of cloudcondensation nuclei. In this work, we present a comprehensive set of ship-basedaerosol and meteorological observations collected on the 6-weekSouthern Ocean Ross Sea Marine Ecosystem and Environment voyage(TAN1802) voyage of RV Tangaroa across the Southern Ocean, from Wellington, New Zealand, tothe Ross Sea, Antarctica. The voyage was carried out from 8 February to21 March 2018. Many distinct, but contemporaneous, data sets were collectedthroughout the voyage. The compiled data sets include measurements from arange of instruments, such as (i) meteorological conditions at the sea surfaceand profile measurements; (ii) the size and concentration of particles; (iii)trace gases dissolved in the ocean surface such as dimethyl sulfide andcarbonyl sulfide; (iv) and remotely sensed observations of low clouds. Here,we describe the voyage, the instruments, and data processing, and provide a briefoverview of some of the data products available. We encourage the scientificcommunity to use these measurements for further analysis and model evaluationstudies, in particular, for studies of Southern Ocean clouds, aerosol, andtheir interaction. The data sets presented in this study are publiclyavailable at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4060237 (Kremser et al., 2020). 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, Science Advances)
    Aerosol-cloud interactions (ACIs) are vital for regulating Earth’s climate by influencing energy and water cycles. Yet, effects of ACI bear large uncertainties, evidenced by systematic discrepancies between observed and modeled estimates. This study quantifies a major bias in ACI determinations, stemming from conventional surface or space measurements that fail to capture aerosol at the cloud level unless the cloud is coupled with land surface. We introduce an advanced approach to determine radiative forcing of ACI by accounting for cloud-surface coupling. By integrating field observations, satellite data, and model simulations, this approach reveals a drastic alteration in aerosol vertical transport and ACI effects caused by cloud coupling. In coupled regimes, aerosols enhance cloud droplet number concentration across the boundary layer more homogeneously than in decoupled conditions, under which aerosols from the free atmosphere predominantly affect cloud properties, leading to marked cooling effects. Our findings spotlight cloud-surface coupling as a key factor for ACI quantification, hinting at potential underassessments in traditional estimates. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Geophysical Research Letters)
    Abstract Aerosol‐cloud interactions (ACI) in warm clouds are the primary source of uncertainty in effective radiative forcing (ERF) during the historical period and, by extension, inferred climate sensitivity. The ERF due to ACI (ERFaci) is composed of the radiative forcing due to changes in cloud microphysics and cloud adjustments to microphysics. Here, we examine the processes that drive ERFaci using a perturbed parameter ensemble (PPE) hosted in CAM6. Observational constraints on the PPE result in substantial constraints in the response of cloud microphysics and macrophysics to anthropogenic aerosol, but only minimal constraint on ERFaci. Examination of cloud and radiation processes in the PPE reveal buffering of ERFaci by the interaction of precipitation efficiency and radiative susceptibility. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email