skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the NSF-PAR

Title: Compensating Errors in Cloud Radiative and Physical Properties over the Southern Ocean in the CMIP6 Climate Models
Abstract The Southern Ocean is covered by a large amount of clouds with high cloud albedo. However, as reported by previous climate model intercomparison projects, underestimated cloudiness and overestimated absorption of solar radiation (ASR) over the Southern Ocean lead to substantial biases in climate sensitivity. The present study revisits this long-standing issue and explores the uncertainty sources in the latest CMIP6 models. We employ 10-year satellite observations to evaluate cloud radiative effect (CRE) and cloud physical properties in five CMIP6 models that provide comprehensive output of cloud, radiation, and aerosol. The simulated longwave, shortwave, and net CRE at the top of atmosphere in CMIP6 are comparable with the CERES satellite observations. Total cloud fraction (CF) is also reasonably simulated in CMIP6, but the comparison of liquid cloud fraction (LCF) reveals marked biases in spatial pattern and seasonal variations. The discrepancies between the CMIP6 models and the MODIS satellite observations become even larger in other cloud macro- and micro-physical properties, including liquid water path (LWP), cloud optical depth (COD), and cloud effective radius, as well as aerosol optical depth (AOD). However, the large underestimation of both LWP and cloud effective radius (regional means ∼20% and 11%, respectively) results in relatively smaller bias in COD, and the impacts of the biases in COD and LCF also cancel out with each other, leaving CRE and ASR reasonably predicted in CMIP6. An error estimation framework is employed, and the different signs of the sensitivity errors and biases from CF and LWP corroborate the notions that there are compensating errors in the modeled shortwave CRE. Further correlation analyses of the geospatial patterns reveal that CF is the most relevant factor in determining CRE in observations, while the modeled CRE is too sensitive to LWP and COD. The relationships between cloud effective radius, LWP, and COD are also analyzed to explore the possible uncertainty sources in different models. Our study calls for more rigorous calibration of detailed cloud physical properties for future climate model development and climate projection.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2031751
NSF-PAR ID:
10359134
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN:
0256-1530
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , Atmospheric Measurement Techniques)

    Abstract. The role of clouds in the Arctic radiation budget is not well understood. Ground-based and airborne measurements provide valuable data to test and improve our understanding. However, the ground-based measurements are intrinsically sparse, and the airborne observations are snapshots in time and space. Passive remote sensing measurements from satellite sensors offer high spatial coverage and an evolving time series, having lengths potentially of decades. However, detecting clouds by passive satellite remote sensing sensors is challenging over the Arctic because of the brightness of snow and ice in the ultraviolet and visible spectral regions and because of the small brightness temperature contrast to the surface. Consequently, the quality of the resulting cloud data products needs to be assessed quantitatively. In this study, we validate the cloud data products retrieved from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) post meridiem (PM) data from the polar-orbiting NOAA-19 satellite and compare them with those derived from the ground-based instruments during the sunlit months. The AVHRR cloud data products by the European Space Agency (ESA) Cloud Climate Change Initiative (Cloud_CCI) project uses the observations in the visible and IR bands to determine cloud properties. The ground-based measurements from four high-latitude sites have been selected for this investigation: Hyytiälä (61.84∘ N, 24.29∘ E), North Slope of Alaska (NSA; 71.32∘ N, 156.61∘ W), Ny-Ålesund (Ny-Å; 78.92∘ N, 11.93∘ E), and Summit (72.59∘ N, 38.42∘ W). The liquid water path (LWP) ground-based data are retrieved from microwave radiometers, while the cloud top height (CTH) has been determined from the integrated lidar–radar measurements. The quality of the satellite products, cloud mask and cloud optical depth (COD), has been assessed using data from NSA, whereas LWP and CTH have been investigated over Hyytiälä, NSA, Ny-Å, and Summit. The Cloud_CCI COD results for liquid water clouds are in better agreement with the NSA radiometer data than those for ice clouds. For liquid water clouds, the Cloud_CCI COD is underestimated roughly by 3 optical depth (OD) units. When ice clouds are included, the underestimation increases to about 5 OD units. The Cloud_CCI LWP is overestimated over Hyytiälä by ≈7 g m−2, over NSA by ≈16 g m−2, and over Ny-Å by ≈24 g m−2. Over Summit, CCI LWP is overestimated for values ≤20 g m−2 and underestimated for values >20 g m−2. Overall the results of the CCI LWP retrievals are within the ground-based instrument uncertainties. To understand the effects of multi-layer clouds on the CTH retrievals, the statistics are compared between the single-layer clouds and all types (single-layer + multi-layer). For CTH retrievals, the Cloud_CCI product overestimates the CTH for single-layer clouds. When the multi-layer clouds are included (i.e., all types), the observed CTH overestimation becomes an underestimation of about 360–420 m. The CTH results over Summit station showed the highest biases compared to the other three sites. To understand the scale-dependent differences between the satellite and ground-based data, the Bland–Altman method is applied. This method does not identify any scale-dependent differences for all the selected cloud parameters except for the retrievals over the Summit station. In summary, the Cloud_CCI cloud data products investigated agree reasonably well with those retrieved from ground-based measurements made at the four high-latitude sites.

     
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ( , Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres)
    Abstract

    Shifts in Southern Ocean (SO, 40–85°S) shortwave cloud feedback (SWFB) toward more positive values are the dominant contributor to higher effective climate sensitivity (ECS) in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models. To provide an observational constraint on the SOSWFB, we use a simplified physical model to connect SOSWFBwith the response of column‐integrated liquid water mass (LWP) to warming and the susceptibility of albedo to LWP in 50 CMIP5 and CMIP6 GCMs. In turn, we predict the responses of SO LWP using a cloud‐controlling factor (CCF) model. The combination of the CCF model and radiative susceptibility explains about 50% of the variance in the GCM‐simulatedSWFBin the SO. Observations of SW radiation fluxes, LWP, and CCFs from reanalysis are used to constrain the SOSWFB. Observations suggest a SO LWP increase in response to warming and albedo susceptibility to LWP that is on the lower end relative to GCMs. The overall constraint on the contribution of SO to global meanSWFBis −0.168 to +0.051 W m−2 K−1, relative to −0.277 to +0.270 Wm−2 K−1. In summary, observations suggest SOSWFBis less likely to be as extremely positive as predicted by some CMIP6 GCMs, but more likely to range from moderately negative to weakly positive.

     
    more » « less
  3. ; ( , Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
    Abstract. Twelve months of measurements collected during the Two-ColumnAerosol Project field campaign at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, which started inthe summer of 2012, were used to investigate aerosol physical, optical, andchemical properties and their influences on the dependence of clouddevelopment on thermodynamic (i.e., lower tropospheric stability, LTS)conditions. Relationships between aerosol loading and cloud properties underdifferent dominant air-mass conditions and the magnitude of the firstindirect effect (FIE), as well as the sensitivity of the FIE to differentaerosol compositions, are examined. The seasonal variation in aerosol numberconcentration (Na) was not consistent with variations in aerosoloptical properties (i.e., scattering coefficient, σs, andcolumnar aerosol optical depth). Organics were found to have a largecontribution to small particle sizes. This contribution decreased during theparticle growth period. Under low-aerosol-loading conditions, the liquidwater path (LWP) and droplet effective radius (DER) significantly increasedwith increasing LTS, but, under high-aerosol-loading conditions, LWP and DERchanged little, indicating that aerosols significantly weakened thedependence of cloud development on LTS. The reduction in LWP and DER fromlow- to high-aerosol-loading conditions was greater in stable environments,suggesting that clouds under stable conditions are more susceptible toaerosol perturbations than those under more unstable conditions. Highaerosol loading weakened the increase in DER as LWP increased andstrengthened the increase in cloud optical depth (COD) with increasing LWP,resulting in changes in the interdependence of cloud properties. Under bothcontinental and marine air-mass conditions, high aerosol loading cansignificantly increase COD and decrease LWP and DER, narrowing theirdistributions. Magnitudes of the FIE estimated under continental air-massconditions ranged from 0.07±0.03 to 0.26±0.09 with a meanvalue of 0.16±0.03 and showed an increasing trend as LWP increased.The calculated FIE values for aerosols with a low fraction of organics aregreater than those for aerosols with a high fraction of organics. Thisimplies that clouds over regions dominated by aerosol particles containingmostly inorganics are more susceptible to aerosol perturbations, resultingin larger climate forcing, than clouds over regions dominated by organicaerosol particles. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , Journal of Climate)
    Abstract

    The simulations of clouds and surface radiation from 10 CMIP6 models and their CMIP5 predecessors are compared to the ARM ground-based observations over different climate regions. Compared to the ARM radar-lidar derived total cloud fractions (CFT) and cloud fraction vertical distributions over the six selected sites, both CMIP5 and CMIP6 significantly underestimated CFTand low-level CF over the Northern Hemispheric midlatitude sites (SGPC1 and ENAC1), although the biases are generally smaller in CMIP6. Over the tropical oceanic site (TWPC2), 5 out of 10 CMIP6 models better simulated low-level CF than their CMIP5 predecessors. CMIP6 simulations generally agreed well with the ARM observations in CFTand cloud fraction vertical distributions over the tropical continental (MAOM1) and coastal (TWPC3) sites but missed the transitions between dry and wet seasons, similar to CMIP5 simulations. The improvements in downwelling shortwave fluxes (SWdn) at the surface from the majority of CMIP6 compared to CMIP5 primarily resulted from the improved cloud fraction simulations, especially over the SGPC1, ENAC1, and TWPC3 sites. By contrast, both CMIP5 and CMIP6 models exhibited diverse performances of clouds and shortwave radiation over the Arctic site (NSAC1), where CMIP6 models produced more clouds than CMIP5 models, especially for the low-level clouds. The comparisons between observations and CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations provide valuable quantitative assessments of the accuracy of mean states and variabilities in the model simulations and shed light on general directions to improve climate models in different regions.

     
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ( , Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres)
    Abstract

    Cloud diurnal variation (CDV) affects cloud radiative effects significantly as clouds reflect shortwave radiation only during the daytime but trap outgoing longwave radiation in both daytime and nighttime. Meanwhile, CDV also rectifies atmospheric variations of longer time scales via interactions with other physical and dynamic processes. These make CDV a valuable aspect for diagnosing climate model performance. Here, we evaluate the accuracy of simulated CDV in state‐of‐the‐art global climate models (GCMs) by comparing CDV in the historical simulation of 32 GCMs from 20 institutes participating the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) with observations from the International Satellite and Cloud Climatology Project‐H product. While good agreement is found over the oceans, significant biases exist over land (notably deserts and plateaus), where the models simulate excessive nighttime clouds and insufficient daytime clouds and miss the observed peak of cloud fraction in the early afternoon. These biases persist throughout the year. It is illustrated that correcting the CDV biases tends to reduce the known model biases of smaller shortwave cloud radiative effect over the midlatitude Africa‐Europe‐Asia continent, South America, and vast ocean areas. Inter‐model comparisons show that the CDV biases vary significantly among models from different institutes and present similar characteristics among models from the same institutes, and suggests that the biases are more likely to be attributed to deficiencies in cloud‐related physical parameterizations rather than the model treatment of resolution, ocean, and chemistry. The improvement of CMIP6 models against their CMIP5 counterparts in simulating CDV is also discussed.

     
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email