An official website of the United States government
Abstract A drift‐diffusion model is used to simulate the low‐altitude electron distribution, accounting for azimuthal drift, pitch angle diffusion, and atmospheric backscattering effects during a rapid electron dropout event on 21st August 2013, atL = 4.5. Additional external loss effects are introduced during times when the low‐altitude electron distribution cannot be reproduced by diffusion alone. The model utilizes low‐altitude electron count rate data from five POES/MetOp satellites to quantify pitch angle diffusion rates. Low‐altitude data provides critical constraint on the model because it includes the drift loss cone region where the electron distribution in longitude is highly dependent on the balance between azimuthal drift and pitch angle diffusion. Furthermore, a newly derived angular response function for the detectors onboard POES/MetOp is employed to accurately incorporate the bounce loss cone measurements, which have been previously contaminated by electrons from outside the nominal field‐of‐view. While constrained by low‐altitude data, the model also shows reasonable agreement with high‐altitude data. Pitch angle diffusion rates during the event are quantified and are faster at lower energies. Precipitation is determined to account for all of the total loss observed for 450 keV electrons, 88% for 600 keV and 38% for 900 keV. Predictions made in the MeV range are deemed unreliable as the integral energy channels E3 and P6 fail to provide the necessary constraint at relativistic energies.
more »
« less
Electron Scattering, Transport and Energization by Alfvénic Turbulence in Earth's Outer Radiation Belt
Abstract The transport of energetic electrons immersed in Alfvénic turbulence in Earth's outer radiation belt is explored. It is shown how electrons subject to the action of an empirically derived 3‐D spectrum of Alfvénic field fluctuations experience rapid transport acrossL‐shells, pitch‐angle and through momentum space. Timescales for radial transport are less than a drift period while scattering at large pitch‐angle occurs at a similar rate. Transport through momentum space occurs at a rate comparable to that in whistler mode chorus and is particularly rapid below 100 keV. Bounce‐averaged transport coefficients for these processes are consistent with quasi‐linear estimates for drift‐bounce resonances, albeit with enhanced values. A super‐diffusive to sub‐diffusive transition with increasing energy is identified.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2041971
- PAR ID:
- 10430559
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 13
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract The very‐low frequency (VLF) and low frequency (LF) waves from ground transmitters propagate in the ionospheric waveguide, and a portion of their power leaks to the Earth's inner radiation belt and slot region where it can cause electron precipitation loss. Using Van Allen Probes observations, we perform a survey of the VLF and LF transmitter waves at frequencies from 14 to 200 kHz. The statistical electric and magnetic wave amplitudes and frequency spectra are obtained at 1 < L < 3. Based on a recent study on the propagation of VLF transmitter waves, we divide the total wave power into ducted and unducted portions, and model the wave normal angle of unducted waves with dependences onLshell, magnetic latitude, and wave frequency. At lower frequencies, the unducted waves are launched along the vertical direction and the wave normal angle increases during the propagation until reaching the Gendrin angle; at higher frequencies, the normal angle of unducted waves follows the variation of Gendrin angle. We calculate the bounce‐averaged pitch angle and momentum diffusion coefficients of electrons due to ducted and unducted VLF and LF waves. Unducted and ducted waves cause efficient pitch angle scattering atL = 1.5 and 2.5, respectively. Although the wave power from ground transmitters at frequencies higher than 30 kHz is low, these waves can cause the pitch angle scattering of lower energy (2–200 keV atL = 1.5) electrons, which cannot resonate with the VLF transmitter waves at frequencies below 30 kHz, lightning generated whistlers, or plasmaspheric hiss.more » « less
-
Abstract Semi‐empirical coefficients for electron transport in Alfvénic turbulence are used to drive the global evolution of energetic electron distributions through Earth's outer radiation belt. It is shown how these turbulent fields facilitate radial transport and pitch‐angle scattering that drive losses through the magnetopause, into the plasma sheet, through the plasmapause and to the atmosphere. Butterfly distributions are formed due to pitch‐angle scattering and the combined effect of the loss processes. For the observed spectrum of oscillations, it is estimated that Alfvénic turbulence drives order of magnitude depletions of outer radiation belt electron fluxes at relativistic energies over a period of a few hours. On the other hand, at lower energies, energization in transverse Alfvénic electric fields leads to enhancements of the electron spectrum to provide a source population for subsequent acceleration to higher energies and, in concert with the loss processes, provides exponential spectral form as a function of energy.more » « less
-
Abstract Angular response functions are derived for four electron channels and six proton channels of the SEM‐2 MEPED particle telescopes on the POES and MetOp satellites from Geant4 simulations previously used to derive the energy response. They are combined with model electron distributions in energy and pitch angle to show that the vertical 0° telescope, intended to measure precipitating electrons, instead usually measures trapped or quasi‐trapped electrons, except during times of enhanced pitch angle diffusion. A simplified dynamical model of the radiation belt electron distribution near the loss cone, as a function of longitude, energy, and pitch angle, that accounts for pitch angle diffusion, azimuthal drift, and atmospheric backscatter is fit to sample MEPED electron data atL = 4during times of differing diffusion rates. It is then used to compute precipitating electron flux, as function of energy and longitude, that is lower than would be estimated by assuming that the 0° telescope always measures precipitating electrons.more » « less
-
Abstract We evaluate the diffusive and nonlinear scattering of ring current protons by electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves in the Earth's inner magnetosphere using test particle simulations. EMIC waves are commonly observed inside and outside the plasmasphere with wave amplitudes ranging from 100 pT to several nT. Field‐aligned EMIC waves can scatter 1 keV–1 MeV protons counter‐streaming with respect to the waves through first order cyclotron resonance. Through the analyses of the proton equatorial pitch angle variations along the field line, our simulations reveal the typical interaction features including quasilinear diffusion for small wave amplitudes, phase trapping and bunching at intermediate and large pitch angles, anomalous phase trapping and positive phase bunching at small pitch angles, and non‐resonant scattering at pitch angles and energies outside the resonance regime. Using different wave amplitudes from 100 pT to 5 nT, we compared the modeling results of proton equatorial pitch angle variations between quasilinear and test particle simulations, and between diffusive scattering and advective effects. For monochromatic He‐band EMIC waves atL = 5, the interaction between protons and EMIC waves with amplitudes below 500 pT could be described as a diffusive process and quantified by quasilinear theory; nonlinear interactions and advection effects become important for wave amplitudes larger than 1 nT. The interactions between EMIC waves and ring current protons are analogous to the interactions between whistler‐mode chorus waves and radiation belt electrons described in previous studies, despite the quantitative differences in the wave amplitude threshold of quasilinear diffusion applicability.more » « less
