The rapid increase in computing demand and corresponding energy consumption have focused attention on computing's impact on the climate and sustainability. Prior work proposes metrics that quantify computing's carbon footprint across several lifecycle phases, including its supply chain, operation, and end-of-life. Industry uses these metrics to optimize the carbon footprint of manufacturing hardware and running computing applications. Unfortunately, prior work on optimizing datacenters' carbon footprint often succumbs to the sunk cost fallacy by considering embodied carbon emissions (a sunk cost) when making operational decisions (i.e., job scheduling and placement), which leads to operational decisions that do not always reduce the total carbon footprint. In this paper, we evaluate carbon-aware job scheduling and placement on a given set of servers for several carbon accounting metrics. Our analysis reveals state-of-the-art carbon accounting metrics that include embodied carbon emissions when making operational decisions can increase the total carbon footprint of executing a set of jobs. We study the factors that affect the added carbon cost of such suboptimal decision-making. We then use a real-world case study from a datacenter to demonstrate how the sunk carbon fallacy manifests itself in practice. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings in better guiding effective carbon-aware scheduling in on-premise and cloud datacenters.
more »
« less
On the Promise and Pitfalls of Optimizing Embodied Carbon
To halt further climate change, computing, along with the rest of society, must reduce, and eventually eliminate, its carbon emis- sions. Recently, many researchers have focused on estimating and optimizing computing’s embodied carbon, i.e., from manufactur- ing computing infrastructure, in addition to its operational carbon, i.e., from executing computations, primarily because the former is much larger than the latter but has received less research attention. Focusing attention on embodied carbon is important because it can incentivize i) operators to increase their infrastructure’s efficiency and lifetime and ii) downstream suppliers to reduce their own op- erational carbon, which represents upstream companies’ embodied carbon. Yet, as we discuss, focusing attention on embodied car- bon may also introduce harmful incentives, e.g., by significantly overstating real carbon reductions and complicating the incentives for directly optimizing operational carbon. This position paper’s purpose is to mitigate such harmful incentives by highlighting both the promise and potential pitfalls of optimizing embodied carbon.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10433371
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- ACM Workshop of Hot Topics in Sustainable Computing
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1-6
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
To represent the entire carbon footprint of computing devices, carbon metrics often include both an embodied cost (i.e., carbon cost to produce the device) and an operational cost (i.e., carbon cost to run the device). The embodied carbon cost is typically high, but it is amortized over the lifetime of the device. In this vision statement, we argue that for carbon metrics to be useful, we need (i) accurate metrics for lifetime, which are challenging for SSDs, and (ii) correct reasoning about carbon costs when using such metrics.more » « less
-
Buildings consume over half of annual energy supply as embodied and operating energy in their construction and operation releasing harmful emissions to the atmosphere. Over 90 % of the embodied energy is attributed to construction materials used in building structure, envelope, and interiors that must be reduced to minimize material use. Concrete is one of the major materials that contributes significantly to the energy and carbon footprint of buildings, as it is responsible for 5-9 % of global carbon emission. Because most of the concrete use in the building sector occurs in building structures, assessing how building design parameters influence its environmental sustainability is important. One of the design parameters that impact the sustainability of buildings is the aspect ratio, which is defined as the ratio of horizontal to vertical surface area of a building. A building with the same floor area can be designed horizontally or vertically with different aspect ratios, which will influence its structural design and eventually the amount of concrete used in the building. In this paper, we examine how aspect ratio may affect the environmental sustainability of a buildings foundation, structural framing, and slab. We model the structure of a generic building with different aspect ratio to analyze if aspect ratio can help reduce the energy and carbon embodied in reinforced concrete structures.more » « less
-
Smart phones have revolutionized the availability of computing to the consumer. Recently, smart phones have been aggressively integrating artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities into their devices. The custom designed processors for the latest phones integrate incredibly capable and energy efficient graphics processors (GPUs) and tensor processors (TPUs) to accommodate this emerging AI workload and on-device inference. Unfor- tunately, smart phones are far from sustainable and have a substantial carbon footprint that continues to be dominated by environmental impacts from their manufacture and far less so by the energy required to power their operation. In this paper we explore the possibility of reversing the trend to increase the dedicated silicon dedicated to emerging application workloads in the phone. Instead we consider how in-memory processing using the DRAM already present in the phone could be used in place of dedicated GPU/TPU devices for AI inference. We explore the potential savings in embodied carbon that could be possible with this tradeoff and provide some analysis of the potential of in- memory computing to compete with these accelerators. While it may not be possible to achieve the same throughput, we suggest that the responsiveness to the user may be sufficient using in- memory computing, while both the embodied and operational carbon footprints could be improved. Our approach can save circa 10–15kgCO2e.more » « less
-
The carbon footprint associated with large language models (LLMs) is a significant concern, encompassing emissions from their training, inference, experimentation, and storage processes, including operational and embodied carbon emissions. An essential aspect is accurately estimating the carbon impact of emerging LLMs even before their training, which heavily relies on GPU usage. Existing studies have reported the carbon footprint of LLM training, but only one tool, mlco2, can predict the carbon footprint of new neural networks prior to physical training. However, mlco2 has several serious limitations. It cannot extend its estimation to dense or mixture-of-experts (MoE) LLMs, disregards critical architectural parameters, focuses solely on GPUs, and cannot model embodied carbon footprints. Addressing these gaps, we introduce \textit{\carb}, an end-to-end carbon footprint projection model designed for both dense and MoE LLMs. Compared to mlco2, \carb~significantly enhances the accuracy of carbon footprint estimations for various LLMs. The source code is released at \url{https://github.com/SotaroKaneda/MLCarbon}.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

