An official website of the United States government
Introduction: This study examines how a research-practice partnership (RPP) involving university researchers and local education agency leaders across California engaged in the ongoing work of collaboratively defining and operationalizing “equity” in computer science (CS) education implementation. Grounded in Freire’s concepts of praxis, words-as-praxis, and dialog, this qualitative research explores how sustained engagement with defining equity became a transformative practice rather than a preliminary planning activity. Methods: Over 4 years, the RPP iteratively developed three versions of an equity definition, responding to changing socio-political contexts. The RPP expanded from 5 to 17 leaders, ultimately scaling to influence a state-sponsored initiative encompassing 38 county offices of education. Data sources for the study include RPP meeting notes, interviews with RPP members, and analysis of evolving equity documents. Results: Findings reveal four key themes: (1) productive tensions between CS content focus and equity emphasis that forced deeper examination of assumptions; (2) the necessity of iterative equity definition as an ongoing process responsive to socio-historical contexts; (3) inclusion/exclusion dynamics within the partnership that shaped both representation and understanding; and (4) how collaborative equity definition built capacity for sustained systemic change. Significantly, resistance to equity conversations paradoxically validated the need for sustained dialog, revealing underlying assumptions about CS education’s “neutrality” that required examination. Discussion: The study demonstrates how collaborative equity definition serves dual functions: developing shared language for collective action while transforming participants’ professional identities and commitments. Participants became leaders of California’s statewide CS education equity initiatives, creating tools and approaches that continue to influence practice years later. This work contributes to research-practice partnership literature by showing how treating equity definition as ongoing praxis—rather than preliminary consensus-building— can create conditions for sustained educational transformation, with implications for STEM education partnerships seeking to center equity while navigating political resistance and changing contexts.
more »
« less
Continuous Improvement to Operationalize Equity in a Research-Practice- Partnership with Computer Science Education Leaders
This study explores how a research-practice partnership’s (RPP) continuous improvement methods influenced equity leadership practices in computer science education for school administrators. District leaders and researchers analyzed and documented their continuous improvement process to define “equity and the iterative process of developing this shared definition. Findings reveal this process operationalized equity on two levels: 1) An external examination of equity in education and how racism and biases exacerbate access to computer science education, and 2) An internal gaze on the lack of diversity among our RPP. Key to each of these findings is the collective focus on an ever-changing definition of equity that encouraged our RPP to see our agency as school leaders in disrupting inequality and enacting change.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1837780
- PAR ID:
- 10437624
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- AERA
- ISSN:
- 0736-1661
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
This paper describes a four-year research practice partnership (RPP) dedicated to building capacity to scale and sustain equitable computer science education across the state of California, USA. The acronym of the RPP–SCALE: Supporting Computing Access and Leadership Equity in California–is also the same acronym that describes the five elements of our healthy research practice partnership: Shared Leadership, Collaboration, Application to Practice, Learning is Ongoing, and Equity-Focused. In response to the lack of supports for school leaders to implement equity-centered computer science education, this partnership brings together 17 local education agencies (including public school districts and county offices of education) and educational researchers to understand how to increase leadership capacity that supports meaningful computing learning opportunities for individuals most underrepresented in the field (e.g., Black, Brown, Indigenous, low-income, and female students). Through mixed methods research methodologies, this paper surfaces details about best practices for creating and sustaining RPPs, as well as the positive impacts of the SCALE RPP’s activities on partners (e.g., the “CS Equity Guide” and associated professional development workshop for school leaders, Summer of CS initiative, etc.) that were created in response to the partnership’s shared goals and interests.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Computer science (CS) has the potential to positively impact the economic well-being of those who pursue it, and the lives of those who benefit from its innovations. Yet, large CS learning opportunity gaps exist for students from historically underrepresented populations. The Computer Science for All (CS for All) movement has brought nationwide attention to these inequities in CS education. More recently, financial support for research-practice partnerships (RPPs) has increased to address these disparities because such collaborations can yield more relevant research for immediate educational/practical application. However, for initiatives to effectively engage in equity-focused initiatives toward making computing inclusive, partnership members need to begin with a shared definition of equity to which all are accountable. This poster takes a critical look at the development of a collaboratively developed definition of equity and its application in a CS for All RPP of university researchers and administrators from local education agencies across the state of California. Details are shared about how the RPP collectively defined equity and how that definition evolved and informed the larger project’s work with school administrators/educators.more » « less
-
CSforALL and SageFox (Ed.)Computer science (CS) has the potential to positively impact the economic well-being of those who pursue it, and the lives of those who benefit from its innovations. Yet, large CS learning opportunity gaps exist for students from systemically excluded populations. Because of these disparities, the Computer Science for All (CS for All) movement has brought nationwide attention to inequity in CS education. Funding agencies and institutions are supporting the development of research-practice partnerships (RPPs) to address these disparities, recognizing that collaboration between researchers and educators yields accurate and relevant research results, while informing teaching practice. However, for initiatives to effectively make computing inclusive, partnership members need to begin with a shared and collaboratively generated definition of equity to which all are accountable. This paper takes a critical look at the development of a shared definition of equity and its application in a CS for All RPP composed of university researchers and administrators from local education agencies across a large west coast state. Details are shared about how the RPP came together across research and practice to define equity, as well as how that definition continued to evolve and inform the larger project’s work with school administrators/educators. Suggestions about how to apply key lessons from this equity exercise are offered to inform similar justice-oriented projects.more » « less
-
Background and Context: Most large-scale statewide initiatives of the Computer Science for All (CS for All) movement have focused on the classroom level. Critical questions remain about building school and district leadership capacity to support teachers while implementing equitable computer science education that is scalable and sustainable. Objective: This statewide research-practice partnership, involving university researchers and school leaders from 14 local education agencies (LEA) from district and county offices, addresses the following research question: What do administrators identify as most helpful for understanding issues related to equitable computer science implementation when engaging with a guide and workshop we collaboratively developed to help leadership in such efforts? Method: Participant surveys, interviews, and workshop observations were analyzed to understand best practices for professional development supporting educational leaders. Findings: Administrators value computer science professional development resources that: (a) have a clear focus on “equity;” (b) engage with data and examples that deepen understandings of equity; (c) provide networking opportunities; (d) have explicit workshop purpose and activities; and (e) support deeper discussions of computer science implementation challenges through pairing a workshop and a guide. Implications: Utilizing Ishimaru and Galloway’s (2014) framework for equitable leadership practices, this study offers an actionable construct for equitable implementation of computer science including (a) how to build equity leadership and vision; (b) how to enact that vision; and (c) how to scale and sustain that vision. While this construct applies to equitable leadership practices more broadly across all disciplines, we found its application particularly useful when explicitly focused on equity leadership practices in computer science.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
