Abstract Designing the 3D layout of interconnected systems (SPI2), which is a ubiquitous task in engineered systems, is of crucial importance. Intuitively, it can be thought of as the simultaneous placement of (typically rigid) components and subsystems, as well as the design of the routing of (typically deformable) interconnects between these components and subsystems. However, obtaining solutions that meet the design, manufacturing, and life-cycle constraints is extremely challenging due to highly complex and nonlinear interactions between geometries, the multi-physics environment in which the systems participate, the intricate mix of rigid and deformable geometry, as well as the difficult manufacturing and life-cycle constraints. Currently, this design task heavily relies on human interaction even though the complexity of searching the design space of most practical problems rapidly exceeds human abilities. In this work, we take advantage of high-performance hierarchical geometric representations and automatic differentiation to simultaneously optimize the packing and routing of complex engineered systems, while completely relaxing the constraints on the complexity of the solid shapes that can be handled and enable intricate yet functionally meaningful objective functions. Moreover, we show that by simultaneously optimizing the packing volume as well as the routing lengths, we produce tighter packing and routing designs than by focusing on the bounding volume alone. We show that our proposed approach has a number of significant advantages and offers a highly parallelizable, more integrated solution for complex SPI2 designs, leading to faster development cycles with fewer iterations, and better system complexity management. Moreover, we show that our formulation can handle complex cost functions in the optimization, such as manufacturing and life-cycle constraints, thus paving the way for significant advancements in engineering novel complex interconnected systems.
more »
« less
Analyzing Expert Design Cost Estimation for Additive Manufacturing
Abstract Compared to conventional fabrication, additive manufacturing enables production of far more complex geometries with less tooling and increased automation. However, despite the common perception of AM’s “free” geometric complexity, this freedom comes with a literal cost: more complex geometries may be challenging to design, potentially manifesting as increased engineering labor cost. Being able to accurately predict design cost is essential to reliably forecasting large-scale design for additive manufacturing projects, especially for those using expensive processes like laser powder bed fusion of metals. However, no studies have quantitatively explored designers’ ability to complete this forecasting. In this study, we address this gap by analyzing the uncertainty of expert design cost estimation. First, we establish a methodology to translate computer-aided design data into descriptive vectors capturing design for additive manufacturing activity parameters. We then present a series of case study designs, with varied functionality and geometric complexity, to experts and measure their estimations of design labor for each case. Summary statistics of the cost estimates and a linear mixed effects model predicting labor responses from participant and design attributes was used to estimate the significance of factors on the responses. A task-based, CAD model complexity calculation is then used to infer an estimate of the magnitude and variability of normalized labor cost to understand more generalizable attributes of the observed labor estimates. These two analyses are discussed in the context of advantages and disadvantages of relying on human cost estimation for additive manufacturing forecasts as well as future work that can prioritize and mitigate such challenges.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2309250
- PAR ID:
- 10439736
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- ASME 2022 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Additive manufacturing (AM) has impacted the manufacturing of complex three-dimensional objects in multiple materials for a wide array of applications. However, additive manufacturing, as an upcoming field, lacks automated and specific design rules for different AM processes. Moreover, the selection of specific AM processes for different geometries requires expert knowledge, which is difficult to replicate. An automated and data-driven system is needed that can capture the AM expert knowledge base and apply it to 3D-printed parts to avoid manufacturability issues. This research aims to develop a data-driven system for AM process selection within the design for additive manufacturing (DFAM) framework for Industry 4.0. A Genetic and Evolutionary Feature Weighting technique was optimized using 3D CAD data as an input to identify the optimal AM technique based on several requirements and constraints. A two-stage model was developed wherein the stage 1 model displayed average accuracies of 70% and the stage 2 model showed higher average accuracies of up to 97.33% based on quantitative feature labeling and augmentation of the datasets. The steady-state genetic algorithm (SSGA) was determined to be the most effective algorithm after benchmarking against estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms, respectively. The output of this system leads to the identification of optimal AM processes for manufacturing 3D objects. This paper presents an automated design for an additive manufacturing system that is accurate and can be extended to other 3D-printing processes.more » « less
-
The widespread growth of additive manufacturing, a field with a complex informatic “digital thread”, has helped fuel the creation of design repositories, where multiple users can upload distribute, and download a variety of candidate designs for a variety of situations. Additionally, advancements in additive manufacturing process development, design frameworks, and simulation are increasing what is possible to fabricate with AM, further growing the richness of such repositories. Machine learning offers new opportunities to combine these design repository components’ rich geometric data with their associated process and performance data to train predictive models capable of automatically assessing build metrics related to AM part manufacturability. Although design repositories that can be used to train these machine learning constructs are expanding, our understanding of what makes a particular design repository useful as a machine learning training dataset is minimal. In this study we use a metamodel to predict the extent to which individual design repositories can train accurate convolutional neural networks. To facilitate the creation and refinement of this metamodel, we constructed a large artificial design repository, and subsequently split it into sub-repositories. We then analyzed metadata regarding the size, complexity, and diversity of the sub-repositories for use as independent variables predicting accuracy and the required training computational effort for training convolutional neural networks. The networks each predict one of three additive manufacturing build metrics: (1) part mass, (2) support material mass, and (3) build time. Our results suggest that metamodels predicting the convolutional neural network coefficient of determination, as opposed to computational effort, were most accurate. Moreover, the size of a design repository, the average complexity of its constituent designs, and the average and spread of design spatial diversity were the best predictors of convolutional neural network accuracy.more » « less
-
Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) can produce designs in a manner that greatly differs from the methods used in the older, more familiar technologies of traditional manufacturing (TM). As an example, AM's layer-by-layer approach to manufacturing designs can lead to the production of intricate geometries and make use of multiple materials, made possible without added manufacturing cost and time due to AM's “free complexity.” Despite this contrasting method for manufacturing designs, designers often forgo the new design considerations for AM (AM design heuristics). Instead, they rely on their familiarity with the design considerations for TM (TM design heuristics) regardless of the intended manufacturing process. For designs that are intended to be manufactured using AM, this usage of TM design considerations is wasteful as it leads to unnecessary material usage, increased manufacturing time, and can result in designs that are poorly manufactured. To remedy this problem, there is a need to intervene early in the design process to help address any concerns regarding the use of AM design heuristics. This work aims to address this opportunity through a preliminary exploration of the design heuristics that students naturally leverage when creating designs in the context of TM and AM. In this study, 117 students in an upper-level engineering design course were given an open-ended design challenge and later tasked with self-evaluating their designs for their manufacturability with TM and AM. This evaluation of the students' designs was later repeated by relevant experts, who would identify the common design heuristics that students are most likely to use in their designs. Future studies will build on these findings by cementing early-stage design support tools that emphasize the significant heuristics found herein. For example, this work found that the design heuristic “incorporating complexity” was the most significant indicator of designs most suited for AM and should therefore be highly encouraged/emphasized when guiding designers in the use of AM. In doing so, it will be possible for early-stage design support tools to maximally improve designs that are intended to be manufactured for AM.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)In achieving full automation of construction cost estimation, the complete processes involved in computing cost estimates must be automated. The typical processes involved in achieving cost estimates are: (1) classification and matching of model elements to their various categories; (2) taking off quantities from design documents or building information models; (3) retrieving unit cost from a cost database; and (4) applying the unit costs and quantities in computing the cost estimate. Although, the level of automation in quantity takeoff has been relatively high, most commercial software programs still require manual inputs from estimators to: (1) match materials of building elements to work items; and/or (2) fulfill essential information requirements that may be missing from design models for accurate cost estimate computations. These missing information are usually obtained from the construction specifications in supplement to the design models. Automating the process of design information extraction from construction specifications can help reduce: (1) the time and cost of the estimation, (2) the manual inputs required in cost estimation computations, and (3) human errors in cost estimates. This paper explores the use of natural language processing techniques to help process construction specifications and the authors propose a new algorithmic method for extracting the needed design information from construction specifications to support wood construction cost estimation. A case study was conducted on a wood construction project to evaluate the authors’ proposed method. The results showed that the proposed method successfully searched for and found design details from construction specifications to fulfil essential information requirements for detailed wood construction cost estimation, with a 94.9% precision and a 97.4% recall.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

