skip to main content


Title: Fluorescence Intensity Fluctuation Analysis of Protein Oligomerization in Cell Membranes
Abstract

Fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy (FFS) encompasses a bevy of techniques that involve analyzing fluorescence intensity fluctuations occurring due to fluorescently labeled molecules diffusing in and out of a microscope's focal region. Statistical analysis of these fluctuations may reveal the oligomerization (i.e., association) state of said molecules. We have recently developed a new FFS‐based method, termed Two‐Dimensional Fluorescence Intensity Fluctuation (2D FIF) spectrometry, which provides quantitative information on the size and stability of protein oligomers as a function of receptor concentration. This article describes protocols for employing FIF spectrometry to quantify the oligomerization of a membrane protein of interest, with specific instructions regarding cell preparation, image acquisition, and analysis of images given in detail. Application of the FIF Spectrometry Suite, a software package designed for applying FIF analysis on fluorescence images, is emphasized in the protocol. Also discussed in detail is the identification, removal, and/or analysis of inhomogeneous regions of the membrane that appear as bright spots. The 2D FIF approach is particularly suited to assess the effects of agonists and antagonists on the oligomeric size of membrane receptors of interest. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of live cells expressing protein constructs

Basic Protocol 2: Image acquisition and noise correction

Basic Protocol 3: Drawing and segmenting regions of interest

Basic Protocol 4: Calculating the molecular brightness and concentration of individual image segments

Basic Protocol 5: Combining data subsets using a manual procedure (Optional)

Alternate Protocol 1: Combining data subsets using the advanced FIF spectrometry suite (Optional; alternative to Basic Protocol 5)

Basic Protocol 6: Performing meta‐analysis of brightness spectrograms

Alternate Protocol 2: Performing meta‐analysis of brightness spectrograms (alternative to Basic Protocol 6)

Basic Protocol 7: Spot extraction and analysis using a manual procedure or by writing a program (Optional)

Alternate Protocol 3: Automated spot extraction and analysis (Optional; alternative to Protocol 7)

Support Protocol: Monomeric brightness determination

 
more » « less
Award ID(s):
1919670
PAR ID:
10444518
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Current Protocols
Volume:
2
Issue:
3
ISSN:
2691-1299
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Intracellular signaling processes are frequently based on direct interactions between proteins and organelles. A fundamental strategy to elucidate the physiological significance of such interactions is to utilize optical dimerization tools. These tools are based on the use of small proteins or domains that interact with each other upon light illumination. Optical dimerizers are particularly suitable for reproducing and interrogating a given protein‐protein interaction and for investigating a protein's intracellular role in a spatially and temporally precise manner. Described in this article are genetic engineering strategies for the generation of modular light‐activatable protein dimerization units and instructions for the preparation of optogenetic applications in mammalian cells. Detailed protocols are provided for the use of light‐tunable switches to regulate protein recruitment to intracellular compartments, induce intracellular organellar membrane tethering, and reconstitute protein function using enhanced Magnets (eMags), a recently engineered optical dimerization system. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    This article was corrected on 25 July 2022. See the end of the full text for details.

    Basic Protocol 1: Genetic engineering strategy for the generation of modular light‐activated protein dimerization units

    Support Protocol 1: Molecular cloning

    Basic Protocol 2: Cell culture and transfection

    Support Protocol 2: Production of dark containers for optogenetic samples

    Basic Protocol 3: Confocal microscopy and light‐dependent activation of the dimerization system

    Alternate Protocol 1: Protein recruitment to intracellular compartments

    Alternate Protocol 2: Induction of organelles’ membrane tethering

    Alternate Protocol 3: Optogenetic reconstitution of protein function

    Basic Protocol 4: Image analysis

    Support Protocol 3: Analysis of apparent on‐ and off‐kinetics

    Support Protocol 4: Analysis of changes in organelle overlap over time

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Protein S‐acylation, predominately in the form of palmitoylation, is a reversible lipid post‐translational modification on cysteines that plays important roles in protein localization, trafficking, activity, and complex assembly. The functions and regulatory mechanisms of S‐acylation have been extensively studied in mammals owing to remarkable development of high‐resolution proteomics and the discovery of the S‐acylation‐related enzymes. However, the advancement of S‐acylation studies in plants lags behind that in mammals, mainly due to the lack of knowledge about proteins responsible for this process, such as protein acyltransferases and their substrates. In this article, a set of systematic protocols to study global S‐acylation inArabidopsisseedlings is described. The procedures are presented in detail, including preparation ofArabidopsisseedlings, enrichment of plasma membrane (PM) proteins, ensuing enrichment of S‐acylated proteins/peptides based on the acyl‐biotin exchange method, and large‐scale identification of S‐acylated proteins/peptides via mass spectrometry. This approach enables researchers to study S‐acylation of PM proteins in plants in a systematic and straightforward way. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    Basic Protocol 1: Preparation ofArabidopsisseedling materials

    Basic Protocol 2: Isolation and enrichment of plasma membrane proteins

    Support Protocol 1: Determination of protein concentration using BCA assay

    Basic Protocol 3: Enrichment of S‐acylated proteins by acyl‐biotin exchange method

    Support Protocol 2: Protein precipitation by methanol/chloroform method

    Basic Protocol 4: Trypsin digestion and proteomic analysis

    Alternate Protocol: Pre‐resin digestion and peptide‐level enrichment

     
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    Background: The growing evidence that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) not only form oligomersbut that the oligomers also may modulate the receptor function provides a promising avenue in the area ofdrug design. Highly selective drugs targeting distinct oligomeric sub-states offer the potential to increase efficacywhile reducing side effects. In this regard, determining the various oligomeric configurations and geometricsub-states of a membrane receptor is of utmost importance. Methods: In this report, we have reviewed two techniques that have proven to be valuable in monitoring thequaternary structure of proteins in vivo: Fӧrster resonance energy transfer (FRET) spectrometry and fluorescenceintensity fluctuation (FIF) spectrometry. In FRET spectrometry, distributions of pixel-level FRET efficiencyare analyzed using theoretical models of various quaternary structures to determine the geometry andstoichiometry of protein oligomers. In FIF spectrometry, spatial fluctuations of fluorescent molecule intensitiesare analyzed to reveal quantitative information on the size and stability of protein oligomers. Results: We demonstrate the application of these techniques to a number of different fluorescence-based studiesof cells expressing fluorescently labeled membrane receptors, both in the presence and absence of variousligands. The results show the effectiveness of using FRET spectrometry to determine detailed information regardingthe quaternary structure receptors form, as well as FIF and FRET for determining the relative abundanceof different-sized oligomers when an equilibrium forms between such structures. Conclusion: FRET and FIF spectrometry are valuable techniques for characterizing membrane receptor oligomers,which are of great benefit to structure‐based drug design. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Necroptosis is a form of inflammatory lytic cell death involving active cytokine production and plasma membrane rupture. Progression of necroptosis is tightly regulated in time and space, and its signaling outcomes can shape the local inflammatory environment of cells and tissues. Pharmacological induction of necroptosis is well established, but the diffusive nature of chemical death inducers makes it challenging to study cell‐cell communication precisely during necroptosis. Receptor‐interacting protein kinase 3, or RIPK3, is a crucial signaling component of necroptosis, acting as a crucial signaling node for both canonical and non‐canonical necroptosis. RIPK3 oligomerization is crucial to the formation of the necrosome, which regulates plasma membrane rupture and cytokine production. Commonly used necroptosis inducers can activate multiple downstream signaling pathways, confounding the signaling outcomes of RIPK3‐mediated necroptosis. Opsin‐free optogenetic techniques may provide an alternative strategy to address this issue. Optogenetics uses light‐sensitive protein‐protein interaction to modulate cell signaling. Compared to chemical‐based approaches, optogenetic strategies allow for spatiotemporal modulation of signal transduction in live cells and animals. We developed an optogenetic system that allows for ligand‐free optical control of RIPK3 oligomerization and necroptosis. This article describes the sample preparation, experimental setup, and optimization required to achieve robust optogenetic induction of RIPK3‐mediated necroptosis in colorectal HT‐29 cells. We expect that this optogenetic system could provide valuable insights into the dynamic nature of lytic cell death. © 2024 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    Basic Protocol 1: Production of lentivirus encoding the optogenetic RIPK3 system

    Support Protocol: Quantification of the titer of lentivirus

    Basic Protocol 2: Culturing, chemical transfection, and lentivirus transduction of HT‐29 cells

    Basic Protocol 3: Optimization of optogenetic stimulation conditions

    Basic Protocol 4: Time‐stamped live‐cell imaging of HT‐29 lytic cell death

    Basic Protocol 5: Quantification of HT‐29 lytic cell death

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Visualizing fluorescence‐tagged molecules is a powerful strategy that can reveal the complex dynamics of the cell. One robust and broadly applicable method is immunofluorescence microscopy, in which a fluorescence‐labeled antibody binds the molecule of interest and then the location of the antibody is determined by fluorescence microscopy. The effective application of this technique includes several considerations, such as the nature of the antigen, specificity of the antibody, permeabilization and fixation of the specimen, and fluorescence imaging of the cell. Although each protocol will require fine‐tuning depending on the cell type, antibody, and antigen, there are steps common to nearly all applications. This article provides protocols for staining the cytoskeleton and organelles in two very different kinds of cells: flat, adherent fibroblasts and thick, free‐swimmingTetrahymenacells. Additional protocols enable visualization with widefield, laser scanning confocal, and eSRRF super‐resolution fluorescence microscopy. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    Basic Protocol 1: Immunofluorescence staining of adherent cells such as fibroblasts

    Basic Protocol 2: Immunofluorescence of suspension cells such asTetrahymena

    Basic Protocol 3: Visualizing samples with a widefield fluorescence microscope

    Alternate Protocol 1: Staining suspension cells adhered to poly‐l‐lysine‐coated coverslips

    Alternate Protocol 2: Visualizing samples with a laser scanning confocal microscope

    Alternate Protocol 3: Generating super‐resolution images with SRRF microscopy

     
    more » « less